I worship the Son of God! You worship the equivalent of comic book heros! I'm telling you, this life in our present form is not eternal, You must understand that as evidenced by the people that were close to you that had died. (My respectful condolences - I'm not trying to be disrespectful, only making a point) Out soul lives in eternity, You know as well a I do that there are good souls and evil souls here on Earth.
This Earth is a testing ground to weed out the evil souls, and allow the pure souls to rise to Heaven. I don't know how many times I can say it, or how many ways I can say it. You need to take a deep look at the state of your soul, and ask yourself, With God, The God of ALL Men be pleased with me.
Evolution is another kike theory that holds ZERO scientific evidence. Belief in evolution is no different to a religion, people have faith that the experts are espousing truth.
Evolution is evident, not in the manner that a monkey can turn into a man, but that children can grow taller than their parents, or become resistant to some disease.
If your parents are 5'7" & 5'4" respectively, and the sons grow-up to be 6'3', (Assuming complete fidelity in the marriage), that is textbook evolution! Same as becoming resistant to a bug/virus that the preceding generation was prone to! That IS evolution, NOT mice morphing automagically turning into Chinese people over time!
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:32:56 ago (+1/-0)
No. Unless you're referring to a textbook with newly defined words, evolution is specifically speciation. No matter how much taller you get you'll never change species. Adaptation is not evolution, nor is it proof of evolution.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 17:48:25 ago (+1/-0)
The debate on evolution had always been about speciation. That's what the whole scopes monkey trial was about and that's what "scientists" claimed the Piltdown Man proved.
There is no evidence of speciation. No one, not even the most devout theologian, has ever claimed that we don't adapt to our environment. There is no debate with regards to adaptation. Every time we get over the flu, we adapt. The debate had always been about whether or not one species evolved into another species.
It has only been recently that "geneticists" have tried to redefine terms to "prove" evolution. Shit like allele frequencies, conflating adaptation and mutation with evolution, etc do not prove evolution. Never have, never will.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 18:47:29 ago (+1/-0)
You bring up a fantastic point about the nuance of the classification system and begs the question, has the way "science" classifies "species" evolved to lend credence to the horseshit theories of evolution?
A dog, coyote, and wolf are different species, but the plate lipped bitch in the White House is the same species as a Norwegian beauty? That does seem a bit off. Has this always been the case? And if not, what, exactly, changed to make this happen?
There is some politicking involved. "Humans" are not properly classified because it would dispel the bullshit agenda and make white genocide too obvious.
Speciation is a spectrum and we draw arbitrary lines. Sometimes those lines are very easy to draw. Others, like with ring species, it is difficult. But even a spectrum stretched out over millions of years has some clear landmarks.
Darwin recycled his (grand)fathers theory, he was at best an explorer and biologist, not a scientist. The correspondense of Markx about evolution kind of vibes to me that evolution is used to foster the idea that all people are the same.
IKr, his argument 'being taller than one's parents is textbook evolution' i just can't imagine his luke-warm firing of brain cells to parse and believe that. It's like asking someone 'what is a woman' all over again.
'Scientists' have tried several different ways to redefine the process of evolution in the past(ie -Natural selection, Punctuated equilibrium, Mutation, Non-random mating, Gene flow, genetic drift). All devolve away from speciation in real life examples.
Since they are positive evolution is actually a thing - i want them to show me the formula expressing the evolutionary process that describes speciation in action...
"Micro improvements" are not evolution. Do you call cancer, de-evolition? Mutations that cause mal-effects, like cancer?
Or, are only the "good" changes considered "evolutionary". And, who gets to decide if a micro-change is "good" - therfore evolutionary vs "bad" - therfore not evolutionary.
And, do you see? Changes in definition. Introductions of definition ambiguity.
It used to be "evolution is a change in species". Now, you're asserting that a "good" change is evolutionary and even though there is no evidence that these micro changes have ever led to speciation, they prove evolution is real so "common sense" suggests that it has or that or will.
Evolution is a process that results in changes in the genetic material of a population over time. Evolution reflects the adaptations of organisms to their changing environments and can result in altered genes, and novel traits. Evolutionary processes depend on both changes in genetic variability and changes in allele frequencies over time.
So micro improvements are out the window!
The root word in Evolution is to Evolve! Things that are detrimental to an organism are contrary to evolution! It's that simple! What allows a human or a creature to thrive & survive is Evolutionary! Cancer DOES NOT fit the definition of an evolutionary change! The body developing cells that negate cancer IS evolutionary!
This is my last word on this! In the end you will believe what you want to believe, and I will believe what is true...
I specifically fucking said that they couldn't prove speciation, which WAS the defining characteristic of "evolution", so they redefined the fucking term "evolution" and turned it into an ambiguous, non-specific, ever changeable, pseudo-definition.
They "proved" evolution by redefining the fucking word!!!
And what do you do? You post the stupid assed retard pseudo-defintion that's about as absolute as "long covid", "fibromyalgia" and "PTSD".
Then, to top it off, because you love the smell of your own farts, you post a bunch of retard faggot shit, like your proving your point, or that I'm wrong, somehow.
Evolution is a process that results in changes in the genetic material of a population over time.
If this were the actual fucking definition of "evolution", NO ONE, NO ONE ON THIS FUCKING PLANET, would say "evolution isn't real". There isn't a thinking person that has ever lived on this fucking planet over the entire time of humanity, that doesn't know, for a fucking fact, that we change over time. That our bodies adapt to our surroundings and mutate in reaction to our surroundings.
The debate isn't about whether humans change over time! You're a disingenuous fucking nigger strawmanning the argument, or dumb as a fucking box of rocks if you actually think that.
The "Great Evolution Debate" is about speciation. The suggestion that we were once creatures that eventually turned into human beings, but prior to this change, were not human beings. Speciation! Not "I got over the flu, and now I'm immune, so evolution is real."
Compare a poodle to a wolf. There's your proof that selective breeding is a thing. Now imagine it's environment instead of the hand of blue haired ladies.
The earth is a cruel, hostile planet, where aggression and brutality equals survival. Every carnivore kills for food, often in spectacularly bloody ways. If this is god's creation, then he has a very, very, dark sense of humor.
You don't prove a negative in science, ya fuckin' retard. The claim that "evolution is real" is the thing that must be proven, not the counter claim that evolution is not happening.
Its not just a matter of if its true or not, evolution is complex and is the best explanation we have right now with overwhelming evidence in multiple fields involved that you can consult btw but I know reading is hard, science changes as we figure out stuff over time, you can even test it out yourself that's the reality.
Still not answering this: publish your findings, its not just yes or no for fucks sakes, take the science that is out and tell us why its wrong.
b) Suggested creationism (out of nothing) inverts perceivable transmutation (within everything)...if one consents to it.
c) Cause (whole) generates effects (partials) by setting itself apart, hence from action into reactions aka motion to matter aka flow (inception towards death) to form (life).
d) Suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to de-nial perceivable when consenting.
Nothing doesn't exist; it implies ignorance of everything from the perspective of each thing within...and ignorance implies ones free will of choice, when choosing want (suggested information) over need (perceivable inspiration).
As for evolution...action (tion) unfolds/opens itself (evolvo) into reactions internally/inherently.
In other words...EN'ERGY, noun (Greek work) - "internal or inherent power" aka whole cause for each partial effect within.
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone...all(in)one"
To be implies center (perception) of circumference (perceivable) and it's the enacting circumference which generates EACH reacting center.
tl; dr...try to create something "new" without shaping it within; out of, and in response to everything already existing.
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:27:25 ago (+1/-0)
Hint: You worship a Jew, everything you think you believe is suspect.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 2435269 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 20:02:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] -1 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 20:39:57 ago (+0/-1)
I'm telling you, this life in our present form is not eternal, You must understand that as evidenced by the people that were close to you that had died. (My respectful condolences - I'm not trying to be disrespectful, only making a point) Out soul lives in eternity, You know as well a I do that there are good souls and evil souls here on Earth.
This Earth is a testing ground to weed out the evil souls, and allow the pure souls to rise to Heaven. I don't know how many times I can say it, or how many ways I can say it. You need to take a deep look at the state of your soul, and ask yourself, With God, The God of ALL Men be pleased with me.
Peace Master Foo!
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 20:47:23 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] -1 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 20:50:37 ago (+0/-1)
Tell me where anon posting appears in the Bible. ;-)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 2501398 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 15:40:42 ago (+4/-3)*
https://youtu.be/a3NQ0wg3iVU?si=V0oKyDI3jA00slWF
Except these supposed experts have no clue what scientific evidence entails.
"Humans are fish" ~ people that believe in evolution
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] -2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 15:48:38 ago (+2/-4)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:10:54 ago (+3/-0)
Step 1. Redefine evolution.
No adaptation is not evolution nor is it proof of evolution.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:20:01 ago (+1/-1)
If your parents are 5'7" & 5'4" respectively, and the sons grow-up to be 6'3', (Assuming complete fidelity in the marriage), that is textbook evolution! Same as becoming resistant to a bug/virus that the preceding generation was prone to! That IS evolution, NOT mice morphing automagically turning into Chinese people over time!
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:32:56 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3899824 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 17:28:49 ago (+2/-1)*
'Words carry no meaning - other than what i want them to mean in any particular moment'....
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 17:48:25 ago (+1/-0)
There is no evidence of speciation. No one, not even the most devout theologian, has ever claimed that we don't adapt to our environment. There is no debate with regards to adaptation. Every time we get over the flu, we adapt. The debate had always been about whether or not one species evolved into another species.
It has only been recently that "geneticists" have tried to redefine terms to "prove" evolution. Shit like allele frequencies, conflating adaptation and mutation with evolution, etc do not prove evolution. Never have, never will.
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 18:26:02 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 18:47:29 ago (+1/-0)
A dog, coyote, and wolf are different species, but the plate lipped bitch in the White House is the same species as a Norwegian beauty? That does seem a bit off. Has this always been the case? And if not, what, exactly, changed to make this happen?
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3899824 2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 23:10:45 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 2 points 1 weekMay 7, 2024 01:00:19 ago (+2/-0)
Speciation is a spectrum and we draw arbitrary lines. Sometimes those lines are very easy to draw. Others, like with ring species, it is difficult. But even a spectrum stretched out over millions of years has some clear landmarks.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 2435269 1 point 1 weekMay 7, 2024 01:17:49 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 4189824 0 points 1 weekMay 7, 2024 09:04:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3899824 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 23:24:47 ago (+1/-0)*
'Scientists' have tried several different ways to redefine the process of evolution in the past(ie -Natural selection, Punctuated equilibrium, Mutation, Non-random mating, Gene flow, genetic drift). All devolve away from speciation in real life examples.
Since they are positive evolution is actually a thing - i want them to show me the formula expressing the evolutionary process that describes speciation in action...
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3899824 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 17:25:17 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 15:53:42 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] -3 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:00:25 ago (+1/-4)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 18:54:08 ago (+3/-0)
Or, are only the "good" changes considered "evolutionary". And, who gets to decide if a micro-change is "good" - therfore evolutionary vs "bad" - therfore not evolutionary.
And, do you see? Changes in definition. Introductions of definition ambiguity.
It used to be "evolution is a change in species". Now, you're asserting that a "good" change is evolutionary and even though there is no evidence that these micro changes have ever led to speciation, they prove evolution is real so "common sense" suggests that it has or that or will.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] -2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 20:18:13 ago (+0/-2)
Evolution is a process that results in changes in the genetic material of a population over time. Evolution reflects the adaptations of organisms to their changing environments and can result in altered genes, and novel traits. Evolutionary processes depend on both changes in genetic variability and changes in allele frequencies over time.
So micro improvements are out the window!
The root word in Evolution is to Evolve! Things that are detrimental to an organism are contrary to evolution! It's that simple! What allows a human or a creature to thrive & survive is Evolutionary! Cancer DOES NOT fit the definition of an evolutionary change! The body developing cells that negate cancer IS evolutionary!
This is my last word on this! In the end you will believe what you want to believe, and I will believe what is true...
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 20:41:17 ago (+3/-0)
I specifically fucking said that they couldn't prove speciation, which WAS the defining characteristic of "evolution", so they redefined the fucking term "evolution" and turned it into an ambiguous, non-specific, ever changeable, pseudo-definition.
They "proved" evolution by redefining the fucking word!!!
And what do you do? You post the stupid assed retard pseudo-defintion that's about as absolute as "long covid", "fibromyalgia" and "PTSD".
Then, to top it off, because you love the smell of your own farts, you post a bunch of retard faggot shit, like your proving your point, or that I'm wrong, somehow.
If this were the actual fucking definition of "evolution", NO ONE, NO ONE ON THIS FUCKING PLANET, would say "evolution isn't real". There isn't a thinking person that has ever lived on this fucking planet over the entire time of humanity, that doesn't know, for a fucking fact, that we change over time. That our bodies adapt to our surroundings and mutate in reaction to our surroundings.
The debate isn't about whether humans change over time! You're a disingenuous fucking nigger strawmanning the argument, or dumb as a fucking box of rocks if you actually think that.
The "Great Evolution Debate" is about speciation. The suggestion that we were once creatures that eventually turned into human beings, but prior to this change, were not human beings. Speciation! Not "I got over the flu, and now I'm immune, so evolution is real."
God, you're a stupid fuckin' nigger.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3899824 -1 points 1 weekMay 7, 2024 04:28:38 ago (+0/-1)
What jew fcking textbook/ website did he get that from - obviously it's the 'current' bs Mainstream meaning. Not the actual historical definition.
How do i get rid of this anon posting/ god damn. I wany my user name on all my comments here.
EDIT: found it.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3899824 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:29:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1075864 -2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 18:18:01 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 2501398 2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 21:31:20 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3899824 0 points 1 weekMay 7, 2024 04:21:05 ago (+0/-0)
first have to explain to them what the big words mean - and then explain to them how to use them correctly.
gonna be a long night.
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 3377899 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 17:55:50 ago (+2/-2)
It's so obvious!
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1179197 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 19:14:28 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] -1 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 19:56:41 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:08:16 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 4249121 3 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:22:04 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:30:42 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7472483 -1 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 17:29:34 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 17:43:23 ago (+2/-0)
Oh my God the horror! Faggot, get your emotions together. You're a fucking idiot.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1075864 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 18:14:57 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3899824 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 17:27:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7472483 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:19:25 ago (+0/-0)
Dude you could be a hero, do it.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:34:02 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7472483 -2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:41:37 ago (+0/-2)
Its not just a matter of if its true or not, evolution is complex and is the best explanation we have right now with overwhelming evidence in multiple fields involved that you can consult btw but I know reading is hard, science changes as we figure out stuff over time, you can even test it out yourself that's the reality.
Still not answering this: publish your findings, its not just yes or no for fucks sakes, take the science that is out and tell us why its wrong.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3899824 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 23:25:57 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:52:32 ago (+1/-1)
There are no "findings" that something isn't happening, ya fucking moron.
And again, step 1 to proving evolution, re-define evolution.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7472483 -1 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 17:14:30 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 17:50:31 ago (+2/-1)
It's like you can't even logic common sense. Prove you didn't read War and Peace. You can't.
[ + ] dass
[ - ] dass 0 points 1 weekMay 7, 2024 04:33:59 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] ItsOk2bArian
[ - ] ItsOk2bArian -1 points 1 weekMay 7, 2024 12:58:38 ago (+0/-1)
Adaptation is not evolution.
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 7472483 -1 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:27:45 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 1998116 -1 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:14:50 ago (+0/-1)
b) Suggested creationism (out of nothing) inverts perceivable transmutation (within everything)...if one consents to it.
c) Cause (whole) generates effects (partials) by setting itself apart, hence from action into reactions aka motion to matter aka flow (inception towards death) to form (life).
d) Suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to de-nial perceivable when consenting.
Nothing doesn't exist; it implies ignorance of everything from the perspective of each thing within...and ignorance implies ones free will of choice, when choosing want (suggested information) over need (perceivable inspiration).
As for evolution...action (tion) unfolds/opens itself (evolvo) into reactions internally/inherently.
In other words...EN'ERGY, noun (Greek work) - "internal or inherent power" aka whole cause for each partial effect within.
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone...all(in)one"
To be implies center (perception) of circumference (perceivable) and it's the enacting circumference which generates EACH reacting center.
tl; dr...try to create something "new" without shaping it within; out of, and in response to everything already existing.
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 6570614 -2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:24:58 ago (+0/-2)
The universe is eternal.
It was never created.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3922117 2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 18:48:47 ago (+2/-0)
Telescope has done no such thing.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 6570614 -1 points 1 weekMay 7, 2024 00:28:51 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 20:48:37 ago (+1/-0)
No big bang, therfore eternal, therfore no creator?
Did you consider your public school to be a good one?
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 6570614 0 points 1 weekMay 7, 2024 00:28:20 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 7472483 -2 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 15:58:47 ago (+0/-2)
If you don't believe in evolution and are religious.
YOU ARE 100% RETARDED
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:02:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 6570614 -1 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:26:05 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:40:50 ago (+1/-0)
Are you familiar with the Book Of Genesis?
https://www.drbo.org/chapter/01001.htm
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7472483 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:45:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 4249121 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:19:45 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 7472483 -3 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:03:34 ago (+0/-3)
Believes in a god with ZERO EVIDENCE EVER
Denies evolution which has OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE
LOL
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:07:32 ago (+1/-0)
Has no belief in God, accepts what the corrupt globalists crammed down his throat through the laughably & historically broken Public School system!
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7472483 -1 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:13:06 ago (+0/-1)
You know you can read stuff and decide for yourself ? you know science is reproducible ?
You know the internet (where you are) was born from science and everything else too, do you deny that science too ?
idiot
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] 0 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:44:20 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7472483 -1 points 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:48:23 ago (+0/-1)
No no its allah !
oh wait there are 3000 gods to chose from
You sound like a braindead religious muslim lol
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1060592 [op] 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:53:35 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 weekMay 6, 2024 16:08:59 ago (+1/-0)