Just as he did in 2020, Trump has claimed without evidence that there will be “cheating” in the 2024 presidential race.
Nothing says "I'm a total fucking faggot propagandist" better that inserting "without evidence" into a statement, especially in the 1st fucking sentence.
2+2=4
freeintx claims, without evidence, that 2+2=4.
This article is abjectly fucking retarded.
Truthout is a non-profit news organization which describes itself as "dedicated to providing independent reporting and commentary on a diverse range of social justice issues".[1] Truthout reports news from a left-wing perspective,[2] with its main areas of focus including mass incarceration and prison abolition advocacy, social justice, climate change, militarism, economics and labor, U.S. LGBTQIA rights and reproductive justice.
Oh, and Orange Man Bad, literally ever other article on their website.
Nothing says "I'm a total fucking faggot propagandist" better that inserting "without evidence" into a statement, especially in the 1st fucking sentence.
Sal_180 claims, without evidence, that facts don't care about your feelings.
See, Dumbfuck? When people speak, especially a political speech, they don't provide evidence. If asked to provide evidence, they could, but when giving a speech, they don't list out the facts and make their case on every statement of fact or opinion. That's not how the English language works.
The addition of "without evidence" is a fag editorial statement. It's the writer inserting himself and his opinion into the story.
There is plenty of evidence that the election was rigged. Virtually every one of Trump's 75+ million supporters knows this and knows what the evidence is. Hell, 25% of democrats know it. They don't need to listen to Trump detail all the various ways that the 2020 election was total bullshit, every time Trump gives a speech.
Evidence needs to be real based on facts. There was no factual evidence the election was stolen. If you believe there is, you're a cuck for doing nothing about it
There is plenty of factual evidence that the election was stolen, you utter fuckin' faggot. SCOTUS ruled in Bush v Gore, once the college votes, its over. What would you suggest people do?
And that's beside the point. I said the faggot writing his bullshit story inserted his pure faggotry editorial. No one gives political speeches where they lay out the evidence of every statement of fact that they make. No one. The media claiming that someone said something "without evidence" is pure editorialization and a propaganda effort. Like Bush said, "You gotta catapult the propaganda."
Every one of Trump's supporters (which is 80% of the Republican Party) know what happened, and about 25% of the Democrats know it as well. That's roughly around 100 Million Americans.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2 weeksApr 14, 2024 20:58:08 ago (+2/-0)*
Nothing says "I'm a total fucking faggot propagandist" better that inserting "without evidence" into a statement, especially in the 1st fucking sentence.
2+2=4
This article is abjectly fucking retarded.
Oh, and Orange Man Bad, literally ever other article on their website.
[ + ] Sal_180
[ - ] Sal_180 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 15, 2024 04:03:39 ago (+0/-0)
Facts don't care about your feelings
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2 weeksApr 15, 2024 06:48:57 ago (+0/-0)
See, Dumbfuck? When people speak, especially a political speech, they don't provide evidence. If asked to provide evidence, they could, but when giving a speech, they don't list out the facts and make their case on every statement of fact or opinion. That's not how the English language works.
The addition of "without evidence" is a fag editorial statement. It's the writer inserting himself and his opinion into the story.
There is plenty of evidence that the election was rigged. Virtually every one of Trump's 75+ million supporters knows this and knows what the evidence is. Hell, 25% of democrats know it. They don't need to listen to Trump detail all the various ways that the 2020 election was total bullshit, every time Trump gives a speech.
[ + ] Sal_180
[ - ] Sal_180 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 15, 2024 08:03:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2 weeksApr 15, 2024 18:21:17 ago (+0/-0)*
SCOTUS ruled in Bush v Gore, once the college votes, its over. What would you suggest people do?
And that's beside the point. I said the faggot writing his bullshit story inserted his pure faggotry editorial. No one gives political speeches where they lay out the evidence of every statement of fact that they make. No one. The media claiming that someone said something "without evidence" is pure editorialization and a propaganda effort. Like Bush said, "You gotta catapult the propaganda."
Every one of Trump's supporters (which is 80% of the Republican Party) know what happened, and about 25% of the Democrats know it as well. That's roughly around 100 Million Americans.
[ + ] Dindu
[ - ] Dindu 0 points 2 weeksApr 16, 2024 04:50:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sal_180
[ - ] Sal_180 [op] 0 points 2 weeksApr 16, 2024 07:12:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 2 weeksApr 14, 2024 21:11:52 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 0 points 2 weeksApr 15, 2024 03:17:20 ago (+0/-0)