Sign into an existing account

good question. what you said about it being a realist perspective is probably accurate. I think that book is an exception because it does juxtapose real life examples of human behavior in a pretty honest way. Now, the question is: where did he get this material. Because it's pretty conspicuous that a jew wrote something like that, and yes jews can veeeeeery easily steal someone's work and cover up every last detail of how it happened - so by default i give them no credit unless there is overwhelming proof to the contrary, but even then I will remain antisemitic.

Overall, I think the book is pretty solid this it's point, though sometimes I think he's relying on "here's a thing that happened, therefore it will always happen this way", and the information isn't reusable or even generalizable in a way that you can use. For example, the Al Capone anecdote where that guy borrow $50k and returned exactly $50k. Now, there IS something to be said for what Greene said where you match exactly something instead of adjusting it one way or another; like you'll frequently see happen in double blind studies for something like taste testing wines where they'll tell people they're drinking 1 or 2 or more wines, then at the end they rate the wines (usually trying to guess which ones are premium, expensive wines), and then they reveal that they were the same wine. In these wine tests, you can imagine that if they had tried degrading or upgrading the wine quality people would make up whatever reasoning they wanted to be true and then say it's fact, but if you keep them the same, then it proves the testers aren't on the ball. Which brings us back to the $50k loan. Had the guy paid back less, that would obviously be a problem, if it were more, Capone might have gotten resentful and thought he should get more or that he actually did make money on it, and instead Capone gained trust for the guy. IDK know that you could reproduce that effect today with people, unless maybe you were in the midst of a lot of distrust (which I think the book mentions), but it didnt seem like a useful anecdote.

Greene seemed to have the most to say about vulturing people's stuff, which is what the book the international jew is all about, and it's the modus operandi of business in america today. and I have seen efficient thieves pull that off.

again, the juxtaposed example he puts in the book really help drive home the utility of the points he's making.

one part of the book i kind of skipped over was the part where he was talking about the chinese woman being brutal with her power, because what a faggot and unsustainable strategy, and if something like that were to happen today, people would make every excuse in the book to cheer it on and we'd just be headed for a long, drawn out disaster. I think that's a flaw in the book (advocating for "women in power"), because women mostly care about tearing people down so everyone else does worse than them rather than building up anything. it was clearly a pointed excerpt to appeal to a female audience.

did you have any specific questions from the book?

I haven't read those other books.