You are a jew of circumcised heart. Read your (((Bible))):
"But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God."
There is no historical evidence for Jesus of Nazareth, for all intents and purposes he is a fictional character like Marvels Ironman or Captain Ahab from Moby Dick.
Meanwhile, Santa Claus is based on a real historical figure. St. Nicholas of Myra (now Demre, Turkey, around 280 AD), was a Greek man who purportedly used to gift children whittled wooden toys.
simply not true, but following your logic, there is no evidence for any pagan "gods". so I wonder why you never criticize the pagans or go on rampages with nicknames and whatnot?
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1 monthMar 31, 2024 20:00:36 ago (+1/-0)
Theocratic sources are not historical sources and myths are foretelling of unique culturally specific stories.
So you can either choose to venerate White people and White ancestors in a White creation myths that discuss bravery and heroism, honour, to be looking out for trickery and deceivers, wonder of adventure and exploration, a quest for knowledge, dreams, and inspiration OR you can suck mutilated jew dick in you book about taxation, wine and prostitution, usury, child rape and all other manner of jewish perversion.
So eye witness accounts don't mean much, eh? The majority of the New Testament books are eye witness accounts. Please provide any eye witness account of any pagan God that has any legitimacy.
There are no written eyewitness accounts of Jesus either inside or outside of the Bible. Furthermore, Roman historians have zero account of him.
LOTR was cooler, it was written by and a member of the Anglo-Saxon master race and tells a story about temptation, greed, the faults of industrialisation mixed with White-centric pagan parables. Frodo had eyewitness testimony from other Hobbits in the book and Sam travelled with Frodo to Middle Earth, it's also just a fantasy book.
You cannot use the bible as proof of the bible not being a work of fiction.
The 4 gospels are exactly that, eyewitness accounts. Either written directly by an apostle, or dictated by an apostle to a writer. Speaking specifically of the gospels, all 4 were written at different times, and in different locations. They are 4 separate books, that have been compiled together. They are historical documents, and there are copies dating to very close to the date of their origination. You are totally wrong, and the LOTR analogy is just stupid.
Eyewitness accounts written almost 150yrs after the fictional character jesus died, lolz. So the witnesses were all a few centuries old. It must have been all that top quality grape drank that kept them youthful.
The majority of New Testament scholars also agree that the Gospels do not contain eyewitness accounts; but that they present the theologies of their communities rather than the testimony of eyewitnesses.
Everything means whatever you want it to mean, at any time to suit your current argument ~ Christcucks law.
You are unable to comprehend that books like the gospel of Mathew was written AS an eyewitness account, it wasn't actually an eyewitness account, even if the characters were made up.
Christcucks are smooth brains so Ill give you another example.
Cervantes wrote Don Quixote mostly in third-person perspective, with Cervantes occasionally entering the thoughts of Don Quixote. It is completely a work of fiction (that means make believe/a lie). Don Quixote didn't write a book, he was never real, it was a character from a book. Third person would be from the perspective of eye-witness accounts, and first person would be from his own mind (the character).
How do you guys tie your own shoes? Every day must feel like magic and sorcery.
[ + ] inaminit
[ - ] inaminit 7 points 1 monthMar 31, 2024 11:28:45 ago (+8/-1)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 0 points 1 monthMar 31, 2024 12:00:05 ago (+1/-1)
"But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God."
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+2:25-29&version=KJV
[ + ] oppressed
[ - ] oppressed 5 points 1 monthMar 31, 2024 11:34:39 ago (+6/-1)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 1 point 1 monthMar 31, 2024 12:23:49 ago (+2/-1)
Escape The hebrew Matrix™
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] -1 points 1 monthMar 31, 2024 11:58:25 ago (+2/-3)
Ok, Christcuck.
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 3 points 1 monthMar 31, 2024 11:53:20 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 0 points 1 monthMar 31, 2024 11:57:19 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 1 monthMar 31, 2024 12:50:46 ago (+2/-1)
Cry.
[ + ] Lordbananafist
[ - ] Lordbananafist 3 points 1 monthMar 31, 2024 11:26:10 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 1 monthMar 31, 2024 12:16:59 ago (+1/-1)
Meanwhile, Santa Claus is based on a real historical figure. St. Nicholas of Myra (now Demre, Turkey, around 280 AD), was a Greek man who purportedly used to gift children whittled wooden toys.
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 0 points 1 monthMar 31, 2024 14:16:17 ago (+1/-1)
simply not true, but following your logic, there is no evidence for any pagan "gods". so I wonder why you never criticize the pagans or go on rampages with nicknames and whatnot?
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1 monthMar 31, 2024 20:00:36 ago (+1/-0)
So you can either choose to venerate White people and White ancestors in a White creation myths that discuss bravery and heroism, honour, to be looking out for trickery and deceivers, wonder of adventure and exploration, a quest for knowledge, dreams, and inspiration OR you can suck mutilated jew dick in you book about taxation, wine and prostitution, usury, child rape and all other manner of jewish perversion.
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 0 points 1 monthApr 1, 2024 08:33:00 ago (+0/-0)
Please provide any eye witness account of any pagan God that has any legitimacy.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1 monthApr 1, 2024 08:47:48 ago (+1/-0)
Furthermore, Roman historians have zero account of him.
LOTR was cooler, it was written by and a member of the Anglo-Saxon master race and tells a story about temptation, greed, the faults of industrialisation mixed with White-centric pagan parables. Frodo had eyewitness testimony from other Hobbits in the book and Sam travelled with Frodo to Middle Earth, it's also just a fantasy book.
You cannot use the bible as proof of the bible not being a work of fiction.
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 0 points 1 monthApr 1, 2024 10:48:17 ago (+0/-0)
Speaking specifically of the gospels, all 4 were written at different times, and in different locations. They are 4 separate books, that have been compiled together. They are historical documents, and there are copies dating to very close to the date of their origination.
You are totally wrong, and the LOTR analogy is just stupid.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 1 monthApr 1, 2024 19:37:10 ago (+0/-0)
Everything means whatever you want it to mean, at any time to suit your current argument ~ Christcucks law.
You are unable to comprehend that books like the gospel of Mathew was written AS an eyewitness account, it wasn't actually an eyewitness account, even if the characters were made up.
Christcucks are smooth brains so Ill give you another example.
Cervantes wrote Don Quixote mostly in third-person perspective, with Cervantes occasionally entering the thoughts of Don Quixote. It is completely a work of fiction (that means make believe/a lie). Don Quixote didn't write a book, he was never real, it was a character from a book. Third person would be from the perspective of eye-witness accounts, and first person would be from his own mind (the character).
How do you guys tie your own shoes? Every day must feel like magic and sorcery.
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 0 points 1 monthApr 1, 2024 21:02:07 ago (+0/-0)
You can believe all your Wikipedia garbage, but it looks like you are the one following fantasies.
[ + ] Lost_In_The_Thinking
[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking -1 points 1 monthMar 31, 2024 12:16:28 ago (+0/-1)