“Dei” is genitive singular of “Deus”, meaning “of God”. For example, Genesis 1:2 Vulgate (spiritus Dei ferebatur super aquas) is translated “the spirit of God moved over the waters” (Douay).
“Dei” is also nominative plural, meaning “gods”. For example, Genesis 3:5 (“eritis sicut dii scientes bonum et malum”) is translated “you shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil” (Douay).
YAHUAH [ יהוה ] (YHVH) -- the proper name of the God of Israel
These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that Yahuah Elohiym made the earth and the heavens, BERE'SHIYTH (GENESIS) 2:4 את CEPHER
Yahusha [ יהוֹשׁוע ] (YHVSA) the name of Jesus the Messiah, - also of Joshua son of Nun, Moses’ successor.
So Yahusha did as Mosheh had said to him, and fought with Amaleq: and Mosheh, Aharon, and Chur went up to the top of the hill. SHEMOTH (EXODUS) 17:10 את CEPHER
The notion that “ the name was so sacred it shouldn't be spoken or written! “ was the Edomite imposition the author is struggling to find, (although Josephus noted that the name was still being pronounced in the early first century) it is nevertheless a prohibition maintained by the successors to the Edomites up to this day. Scripture contains repeated commands to mention, publish, proclaim, and announce His great name.
If ye will not hear, and if ye will not lay it to heart, to give glory unto my name, says Yahuah Tseva'oth, I will even send a curse upon you, and I will curse your blessings: yea, I have cursed them already, because ye do not lay it to heart. MAL`AKIY (MALACHI) 2:2 את CEPHER
"Unfortunately, most people are not aware that such "sacred?" names originated in non-Israelite pagan cultures of the Ancient Near East."
"There is evidence that YHWH was the name of a god worshiped by neighboring races but there is no evidence that such a name was used by true Israelites in ancient times."
"From the historical evidence, it appears that the Edomites have given true Israelites one more fraud which some of our people have claimed with enthusiasm, even making it central to their religion."
The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel never used any personal name to distinguish Him from any peers because He had no peers.
Therefore, no personal name was ever needed. The only name He gave for Himself was "I am THE BEING," (Septuagint: Ex. 3:14) which indicated that He is to be identified with all existence.
The Greek Septuagint Old Testament of 285 B.C. never used any sacred name for God, nor was such ever mentioned by other ancient writers such as the Israelite historians, Philo, and Josephus, or the later Eusebius, or even the Jewish Aristeas the Exegete who wrote his commentary on the Greek Septuagint.
The YHWH word did not appear in any Old Testament text until the Masoretic Text of 1000 A.D.
Nor was the existence of any Hebrew language Old Testament text every mentioned by ancient theologians whose work was exclusively with the Greek Septuagint text.
So just keep right on fucking that fake jew chicken, porkchop.
TIL: that both the Greek Septuagint Old Testament of 285 B.C. AND the Masoretic Text of 1000 A.D., which have been studied by biblical scholars for centuries are, "Nonsense, conjecture, and half truths".
Try reading the scriptures instead.
Okay, porkchop. Happy too. But, first:
Which particular version re-copyed, rehashed, editted, revised, re-revised, version of the collection of scrolls, from the Hebrew translated into Koine Greek, re-translated into Latin, re-translated into German, then re-translated into English, of the many different variants extant?
Textual critic Daniel B. Wallace explains that, "Each deviation counts as one variant, regardless of how many manuscripts attest to it."
Oh. You mean the same Textus Receptus that has 30,000 textual variations?
John Mill (1645–1707) collated textual variants from 82 Greek manuscripts. In his "Novum Testamentum Graecum", cum lectionibus variantibus MSS (Oxford 1707) he reprinted the unchanged text of the Editio Regia, but in the index he enumerated 30,000 textual variants.
Karl Lachmann (1793–1851) was the first who broke with the "Textus Receptus". His object was to restore the text to the form in which it had been read in the Ancient Church in about AD 380. He used the oldest known Greek and Latin manuscripts.
Constantin von Tischendorf's "Editio Octava Critica Maior" was based on "Codex Sinaiticus".
Westcott and Hort published "The New Testament" in the Original Greek in 1881 in which they rejected what they considered to be the dated and inadequate Textus Receptus. Their text is based mainly on "Codex Vaticanus" in the Gospels.
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 1 point 4 weeksMar 29, 2024 09:25:59 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer 1 point 4 weeksMar 29, 2024 07:55:56 ago (+1/-0)
“Dei” is genitive singular of “Deus”, meaning “of God”. For example, Genesis 1:2 Vulgate (spiritus Dei ferebatur super aquas) is translated “the spirit of God moved over the waters” (Douay).
“Dei” is also nominative plural, meaning “gods”. For example, Genesis 3:5 (“eritis sicut dii scientes bonum et malum”) is translated “you shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil” (Douay).
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 0 points 4 weeksMar 29, 2024 16:39:52 ago (+0/-0)
https://remnantradio.org/Archives/articles/sacred_name.htm
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer 0 points 4 weeksMar 29, 2024 17:13:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ יהוה ] (YHVH) -- the proper name of the God of Israel
These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that Yahuah Elohiym made the earth and the heavens,
BERE'SHIYTH (GENESIS) 2:4 את CEPHER
Yahusha
[ יהוֹשׁוע ] (YHVSA) the name of Jesus the Messiah,
- also of Joshua son of Nun, Moses’ successor.
So Yahusha did as Mosheh had said to him, and fought with Amaleq: and Mosheh, Aharon, and Chur went up to the top of the hill.
SHEMOTH (EXODUS) 17:10 את CEPHER
The notion that “ the name was so sacred it shouldn't be spoken or written! “ was the Edomite imposition the author is struggling to find, (although Josephus noted that the name was still being pronounced in the early first century) it is nevertheless a prohibition maintained by the successors to the Edomites up to this day. Scripture contains repeated commands to mention, publish, proclaim, and announce His great name.
If ye will not hear, and if ye will not lay it to heart, to give glory unto my name, says Yahuah Tseva'oth, I will even send a curse upon you, and I will curse your blessings: yea, I have cursed them already, because ye do not lay it to heart.
MAL`AKIY (MALACHI) 2:2 את CEPHER
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 0 points 4 weeksMar 29, 2024 17:38:03 ago (+0/-0)*
"There is evidence that YHWH was the name of a god worshiped by neighboring races but there is no evidence that such a name was used by true Israelites in ancient times."
"From the historical evidence, it appears that the Edomites have given true Israelites one more fraud which some of our people have claimed with enthusiasm, even making it central to their religion."
The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel never used any personal name to distinguish Him from any peers because He had no peers.
Therefore, no personal name was ever needed. The only name He gave for Himself was "I am THE BEING," (Septuagint: Ex. 3:14) which indicated that He is to be identified with all existence.
The Greek Septuagint Old Testament of 285 B.C. never used any sacred name for God, nor was such ever mentioned by other ancient writers such as the Israelite historians, Philo, and Josephus, or the later Eusebius, or even the Jewish Aristeas the Exegete who wrote his commentary on the Greek Septuagint.
The YHWH word did not appear in any Old Testament text until the Masoretic Text of 1000 A.D.
Nor was the existence of any Hebrew language Old Testament text every mentioned by ancient theologians whose work was exclusively with the Greek Septuagint text.
So just keep right on fucking that fake jew chicken, porkchop.
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer 0 points 4 weeksMar 29, 2024 18:33:58 ago (+0/-0)
Try reading the scriptures instead.
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 0 points 4 weeksMar 29, 2024 20:03:25 ago (+0/-0)
Okay, porkchop. Happy too. But, first:
Which particular version re-copyed, rehashed, editted, revised, re-revised, version of the collection of scrolls, from the Hebrew translated into Koine Greek, re-translated into Latin, re-translated into German, then re-translated into English, of the many different variants extant?
Textual critic Daniel B. Wallace explains that, "Each deviation counts as one variant, regardless of how many manuscripts attest to it."
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer 0 points 3 weeksMar 30, 2024 09:50:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 0 points 3 weeksMar 30, 2024 16:24:28 ago (+0/-0)
Which version?
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer 0 points 3 weeksMar 30, 2024 21:04:14 ago (+0/-0)
The History of Bible Translations | Amazing Discoveries
http://adtv.watch/total-onslaught/bible-translation-history
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 0 points 3 weeksMar 30, 2024 22:43:11 ago (+0/-0)
John Mill (1645–1707) collated textual variants from 82 Greek manuscripts. In his "Novum Testamentum Graecum", cum lectionibus variantibus MSS (Oxford 1707) he reprinted the unchanged text of the Editio Regia, but in the index he enumerated 30,000 textual variants.
Karl Lachmann (1793–1851) was the first who broke with the "Textus Receptus". His object was to restore the text to the form in which it had been read in the Ancient Church in about AD 380. He used the oldest known Greek and Latin manuscripts.
Constantin von Tischendorf's "Editio Octava Critica Maior" was based on "Codex Sinaiticus".
Westcott and Hort published "The New Testament" in the Original Greek in 1881 in which they rejected what they considered to be the dated and inadequate Textus Receptus. Their text is based mainly on "Codex Vaticanus" in the Gospels.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 3 weeksMar 30, 2024 21:04:22 ago (+0/-0)