Mexico is very free if you have money or are a high ranking cartel member... a high ranking cartel member might be one of the most free people on the planet. Can basically do what ever they want with a license to kill
The claim is its the worst thing to ever happen... so if it was that big and that bad then the proof and validty would have absolutely no reason to be protected?
But the blaring thing is by out silence people it basically proves that it is in fact a giant lie.
This quote is very appropriate
"When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say"
- Rule of Law - US does not have that, we have anarcho tyranny/selective prosecution - Security and Safety - The US is actively destroying this by infesting White areas which have safety and security with shitskins. - Movement - The US will actively facilitate the movement of shitskins into White areas. - Religion - The US actively enforces the state sponsored religion of diversity inclusion and equity. - Association, Assembly, and Civil Society - Not an option in the US if you're White. - Expression and Information - Not an option in the US if you're White. - Identity and Relationships - Not an option in the US if you're White. - Size of Government - Massive and in service of jewish interests. - Legal System and Property Rights - Not an option in the US if you're White. - Access to Sound Money - Not an option in the US if you're White. - Freedom to Trade Internationally - The US uses trade deficits to bribe other countries which hurts Whites. - Regulation - The US is full of regulatory capture in the service of jewish interests.
Drawing CP is just as bad as real CP or whatever the nomenclature is for taking pics of kids. Woodchippers for people who draw it. Fuck them. Fuck @FreeinTX.
Isn't that a morality statement? And, you feel that impositions of morality is not a restriction on speech or expression?
Are we seriously going to try to determine what goes through someone's mind when they jack off to determine if something should be allowed on a so-called free speech site? That's going to be the line?
Again, no one is harmed by a drawing. Ffs, no one is harmed by what people think about when they jack off, either. Why not stick to things that ACTUALLY harm people and worry less about what you think is right or wrong and try to draw censorship lines around that? Calling someone a nigger or faggot is considered "wrong" by lots of people. So is denying the holohoax. Ban that shit to? On a "free speech" site?
It IS a morality statement. I don't know if you're a jew rat trolling, fbi unpaid intern, or just a pedo but fuck off with your bullshit. You must keep @system entertained because I can't figure out why he is letting you still post you pedo fuck.
He's "letting" me post because he has a nearly free speech site.
Not only do you want loli banned, you want anyone who would defend loli being posted banned.
You are a legit piece of shit. Free speech isn't only the speech you like. Go back to reddit, you utter fucking retard. Stop trying to impose your morality on other people.
Oh, and hey, dumb fuckin' nigger, lots of sites use loli to keep boomers, jews, and feds OFF their platform. Seems these groups can't tolerate it, either. Which one are you?
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 11:06:42 ago (+3/-2)
i specially had many battles online agaisnt supporters of this garbage
So, you believe in thought crimes?
Child porn is illegal because it victimizes children. Depictions of abhorrent shit, regardless of the subject matter, is legal, and should remain legal. The use of thought crimes to suppress a population is far more dangerous than any subject matter depicted in a drawing.
no moron a grown up man shouldnt be aroused by depictions of child in sexual stuff. that shit is beyond sick. most often than not the idiots that engage in child porn often wants to act that fantasy out.
i repeat if you get aroused by the picture of a child you are a scumbag of the greatest magnitude. at very least you need help ASAP.
The use of thought crimes to suppress a population is far more dangerous than any subject matter depicted in a drawing.
Eh, I used to think that but now I recognize how it's been used by the jews as a weapon. Now I'm not so sure on that stance. I dunno what would reliably replace such a policy though.
[ - ] x0x7 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 12:34:06 ago (+1/-0)*
Something can be abhorant and still be a part of free speech. Everything worth saying is abhorant to someone so it can't be the standard. It's a weapon because it gets even us to argue an abhorance standard, and then that standard gets used against us when we try to discuss the holocaust.
Not that arguing against the holocaust is actually abhorant. But good luck overcoming that standard when even arguing that it isn't abhorant is considered abhorant.
Even if it were a jewish weapon the solution isn't to ask jewish government to tell you what you can and can't say.
Even if it were a jewish weapon the solution isn't to ask jewish government to tell you what you can and can't say.
To an extent, yes you are correct. My thing is, if we ever gain control again, there are certain things that we must ban. Mainly the things jews use as weapons against us, like communism and pornography. Which are both covered under such a well-meaning policy like free speech.
They really like to use our own empathy against us. I suppose free speech can make a re-emergence in the vaunted halls of learning in a WN state. But we'll have to crack down like the worst sort of tyrants to recover anything of our people before then.
Usury isn't covered under free speech. It's a financial thing.
And on that front, we need to remove the fed, central banks, fiat currency, and non-tariffed external trades, welfare, most taxes, the min wage, and more. There's always more.
When you stop requiring an actual victim to declare something a crime, the slippery slope of criminalizing the thoughts and harmless actions of your political opponent will always follow.
Each 4chan rule is based on a compete set of principals.
1. You should be able to call someone anything you want. Even niggers and faggots. 2. You should be able to question any event in history. Even the holohoax. 3. And, you should be allowed to explore, as a mental exercise, any subject matter for any reason. Even loli.
I defend a person's ability to think whatever the fuck he wants to think, draw whatever the fuck he wants to draw, and joke about whatever the fuck he wants to joke about. No victim, no crime. Simple as. I couldn't give one fuck about the subject matter, or whether I like, share, or repost such shit.
When you start allowing the suppression of drawings, it will never, ever stop where you think it should.
Maybe you should just learn some fucking history or kill your-self.
I defend a person's ability to think whatever the fuck he wants to think,
if he's thinking of harming kids for self gratification then NOPE
you are confused you conflating freedom of speech to freedom to do harm. one is a right given us by God but the other is not.
you are NOT FREE to abuse a child or to exploit him/her for your sick desires and yes ppl that enjoys lolicon will eventually enjoy child porn. (i dont see a difference anyway)
Drawing a picture is not "doing harm" and it doesn't matter what you think the picture depicts.
Drawing a picture is not "abusing children" and it isn't "exploiting" Anyone.
Drawing pictures is not porn.
As for the difference. Child porn is someone ACTUALLY sexually abusing a child. A child is ACTUALLY harmed. There is ACTUALLY a victim.
Loli is just drawings and you have no idea why someone might draw a picture, tell a joke, or think a thought. It isn't for you to determine, either. If you don't like a class of drawings, don't look at them. But until someone is ACTUALLY harmed, mind your own business.
And, btw, actual porn, between adults is far, far more objectionable than any loli. Any! The entire porn industry is rife with drugs abuse, self harm, suicide, mental illness, and using people's mental illnesses, abuse defense mechanisms, and addictions to victimize them. ACTUAL victims.
Both porn and child porn hurt people. ACTUALLY fucking hurt them. Drawings on a paper, art on a screen hurt no one.
As to whether they will or won't eventually do something, that's the justification for thought crimes, and it's not only total bullshit cause you can't see the future or get in the mind of suspects, but once you tolerate treading down the thought crimes path, it will be abused in ways you can't even comprehend. There isn't an artistic renderung put to paper or screen, in the history of humanity, capable of causing the damage that the tolerance of thought crimes will, inevitably, cause.
[ - ] Sleazy 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 19:18:18 ago (+1/-0)
"As to whether they will or won't eventually do something, that's the justification for thought crimes, and it's not only total bullshit cause you can't see the future or get in the mind of suspects, but once you tolerate treading down the thought crimes path, it will be abused in ways you can't even comprehend. There isn't an artistic renderung put to paper or screen, in the history of humanity, capable of causing the damage that the tolerance of thought crimes will, inevitably, cause."
Drawing a picture is not "doing harm" and it doesn't matter what you think the picture depicts.
Drawing a picture is not "abusing children" and it isn't "exploiting" Anyone.
Drawing pictures is not porn.
that's not the point, dude
the point is that a person that is attracted to kids will try to act out his fantasies because the drawings or the pictures will inflame his/ her desires (there are female pedos too, they do exist)
Loli is just drawings and you have no idea why someone might draw a picture, tell a joke, or think a thought.
weak argument the person attracted to minor characters arent doing it for the art of it. most of these ppl have a fetish with the low age model that is being drawn and that fetish is always sexual in nature.
why do you think that they draw it with skimpy clothes if at all? i know what i'm talking about because i have been in the anime subculture and i know for a fact that most if not all guys are sexually stimulated by these drawings. i have seen them in anime forums.
And, btw, actual porn, between adults is far, far more objectionable than any loli. Any! The entire porn industry is rife with drugs abuse, self harm, suicide, mental illness, and using people's mental illnesses, abuse defense mechanisms, and addictions to victimize them. ACTUAL victims.
you cannot compare a grown up woman posing nude out of her volution than of a child. are you stupid? porn is shit i agree. but its more tolerable for society that someone would consume sex between consenting adults than actual kids.
lolicon is a disgusting thing a man or a woman should not ever have sexual feelings for any under age characters whether is fiction or reality.
again, those that engage in lolicon will consume sooner or later child porn
Again, you can't see the future. When or if that person tries to harm a kid, have at him. You can't convict people of crimes before they commit them.
You certainly can't determine that a person is going to hurt a child just because they drew a picture. That's laughably dumb.
I didn't compare adult porn to child porn. I compared the harm caused by adults in porn to the harm caused by people making drawings. A woman, strung out on drugs and/or desperate for money and/or sexually degenerate because she is a sexual abuse victim, doesn't have a "volition" and is harmed far, far greater than any one ever harmed by a drawing.
Yeah, we get it, you think certain drawings are disgusting. Great. But until someone ACTUALLY tries to harm someone, it ain't your business and an honestly free speech site would allow such drawings. They harm no one, have no victim, and are nothing more than lines on a paper or screen.
And no, loli is not illegal. Like you said, you've seen it all over the place, but you can't name a single fucking person in the free world ever convicted and jailed for drawings. Did you even bother to read the link you posted? As for your link's list of countries that have laws about "depicting children". Take another look at what the headline of this thread is. It's specially about how no country allows free speech. Some countries ban holohoax denial. Some countries will prosecute you for hate crimes if you commit a crime and call someone a nigger. And, some countries are trying to make child sex simulations illegal. All of it is fucking dumb.
You said that you were into anime. What about those 3000 year old characters that LOOK like children? Are they better or worse than an actual 21 year old that looks like a child and does actual porn? Do we arrest someone who draws a 3000 year old anime character that looks like a child but not arrest the actual 21 year old that looks like a child doing actual porn?
You certainly can't determine that a person is going to hurt a child just >because they drew a picture. That's laughably dumb.
sorry the data is there. most of these people at some point will try to harm a kid or to access real child porn. again, there's NO REASON WHATSOEVER why a grown ass person should be attracted to a minor whether is a depiction or 3D as they say
you say that you are christian, the LORD doesnt look good upon pedophiles and yes desire at start at the heart
What about those 3000 year old characters that LOOK like children? Are they better or worse than an actual 21 year old that looks like a child and does actual porn? Do we arrest someone who draws a 3000 year old anime character that looks like a child but not arrest the actual 21 year old that looks like a child doing actual porn?
those are a pretext to draw lolicon content. its wrong to sexualize a minor character. you have deep issues, bro seek help asap.
sorry but you will not change my mind on the subject. no rationalization on this subject will ever change my mind, this shit is dark and disgusting.
there are plenty of cartoons aka anime that doesnt depict minors in sexual innuendos. those who look for this shit are sickos. the end
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 13 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 08:41:06 ago (+13/-0)
You were born into the dystopia
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 5 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 11:39:44 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 16:04:27 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Razzoriel
[ - ] Razzoriel -1 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 13:11:19 ago (+3/-4)
No people can be "free" without commiting to the truth of Jesus Christ.
[ + ] kammmmak
[ - ] kammmmak 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 14:14:36 ago (+3/-2)
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 0 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 17:59:28 ago (+1/-1)
https://files.catbox.moe/gj93i5.mp4
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 3 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 11:50:55 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 3 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 11:50:01 ago (+3/-0)
The claim is its the worst thing to ever happen... so if it was that big and that bad then the proof and validty would have absolutely no reason to be protected?
But the blaring thing is by out silence people it basically proves that it is in fact a giant lie.
This quote is very appropriate
"When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say"
[ + ] green_man
[ - ] green_man 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 10:59:45 ago (+2/-0)
- Security and Safety - The US is actively destroying this by infesting White areas which have safety and security with shitskins.
- Movement - The US will actively facilitate the movement of shitskins into White areas.
- Religion - The US actively enforces the state sponsored religion of diversity inclusion and equity.
- Association, Assembly, and Civil Society - Not an option in the US if you're White.
- Expression and Information - Not an option in the US if you're White.
- Identity and Relationships - Not an option in the US if you're White.
- Size of Government - Massive and in service of jewish interests.
- Legal System and Property Rights - Not an option in the US if you're White.
- Access to Sound Money - Not an option in the US if you're White.
- Freedom to Trade Internationally - The US uses trade deficits to bribe other countries which hurts Whites.
- Regulation - The US is full of regulatory capture in the service of jewish interests.
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 09:38:21 ago (+2/-0)*
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 08:53:11 ago (+4/-2)
1. Be able to say nigger/ faggot
2. Be able to deny holohoax
3. Be able to post loli
Simple
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh [op] 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 15:50:51 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 18:49:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 19:00:37 ago (+0/-0)
No child has ever been harmed by someone simply drawing a picture.
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh [op] 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 21:53:14 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 22:08:56 ago (+1/-0)
he fails to understand this for some reason
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh [op] 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 22:34:23 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1 monthMar 28, 2024 08:18:17 ago (+0/-0)
Isn't that a morality statement? And, you feel that impositions of morality is not a restriction on speech or expression?
Are we seriously going to try to determine what goes through someone's mind when they jack off to determine if something should be allowed on a so-called free speech site? That's going to be the line?
Again, no one is harmed by a drawing. Ffs, no one is harmed by what people think about when they jack off, either. Why not stick to things that ACTUALLY harm people and worry less about what you think is right or wrong and try to draw censorship lines around that? Calling someone a nigger or faggot is considered "wrong" by lots of people. So is denying the holohoax. Ban that shit to? On a "free speech" site?
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh [op] 2 points 1 monthMar 28, 2024 08:33:58 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1 monthMar 28, 2024 08:37:40 ago (+0/-0)
Not only do you want loli banned, you want anyone who would defend loli being posted banned.
You are a legit piece of shit. Free speech isn't only the speech you like. Go back to reddit, you utter fucking retard. Stop trying to impose your morality on other people.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1 monthMar 28, 2024 08:40:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh [op] 2 points 1 monthMar 28, 2024 09:09:05 ago (+2/-0)
@system. Please flush this pedo fuck.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1 monthMar 28, 2024 10:17:11 ago (+0/-0)
The same faggot complaining about how there is no countries is now tagging the admin to ban people for their speech and opinions.
Not only are you a filthy nigger dick suckin' faggot, you're also an insane fucking hypocrite.
You're worse than a 10 year old axe would on a fuckin' troon.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1 monthMar 28, 2024 10:07:08 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 10:00:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 5 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 10:44:05 ago (+5/-0)
lolicon= depictions of under age girls in sexual stuff
pretty prevalent among the anime subculture. i specially had many battles online agaisnt supporters of this garbage
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 11:06:42 ago (+3/-2)
So, you believe in thought crimes?
Child porn is illegal because it victimizes children. Depictions of abhorrent shit, regardless of the subject matter, is legal, and should remain legal. The use of thought crimes to suppress a population is far more dangerous than any subject matter depicted in a drawing.
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 4 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 11:11:56 ago (+5/-1)
no moron a grown up man shouldnt be aroused by depictions of child in sexual stuff. that shit is beyond sick. most often than not the idiots that engage in child porn often wants to act that fantasy out.
i repeat if you get aroused by the picture of a child you are a scumbag of the greatest magnitude. at very least you need help ASAP.
[ + ] Razzoriel
[ - ] Razzoriel -2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 13:12:29 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 11:41:49 ago (+0/-0)
Eh, I used to think that but now I recognize how it's been used by the jews as a weapon. Now I'm not so sure on that stance. I dunno what would reliably replace such a policy though.
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 12:34:06 ago (+1/-0)*
Not that arguing against the holocaust is actually abhorant. But good luck overcoming that standard when even arguing that it isn't abhorant is considered abhorant.
Even if it were a jewish weapon the solution isn't to ask jewish government to tell you what you can and can't say.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 12:48:25 ago (+1/-0)
To an extent, yes you are correct. My thing is, if we ever gain control again, there are certain things that we must ban. Mainly the things jews use as weapons against us, like communism and pornography. Which are both covered under such a well-meaning policy like free speech.
They really like to use our own empathy against us. I suppose free speech can make a re-emergence in the vaunted halls of learning in a WN state. But we'll have to crack down like the worst sort of tyrants to recover anything of our people before then.
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 16:22:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 16:56:36 ago (+0/-0)
And on that front, we need to remove the fed, central banks, fiat currency, and non-tariffed external trades, welfare, most taxes, the min wage, and more. There's always more.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 14:37:06 ago (+0/-1)
Each 4chan rule is based on a compete set of principals.
1. You should be able to call someone anything you want. Even niggers and faggots.
2. You should be able to question any event in history. Even the holohoax.
3. And, you should be allowed to explore, as a mental exercise, any subject matter for any reason. Even loli.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 11:02:08 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 2 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 11:13:03 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 14:40:12 ago (+1/-2)
When you start allowing the suppression of drawings, it will never, ever stop where you think it should.
Maybe you should just learn some fucking history or kill your-self.
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 15:48:12 ago (+1/-0)
if he's thinking of harming kids for self gratification then NOPE
you are confused you conflating freedom of speech to freedom to do harm. one is a right given us by God but the other is not.
you are NOT FREE to abuse a child or to exploit him/her for your sick desires and yes ppl that enjoys lolicon will eventually enjoy child porn. (i dont see a difference anyway)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 18:59:25 ago (+0/-0)*
Drawing a picture is not "abusing children" and it isn't "exploiting" Anyone.
Drawing pictures is not porn.
As for the difference. Child porn is someone ACTUALLY sexually abusing a child. A child is ACTUALLY harmed. There is ACTUALLY a victim.
Loli is just drawings and you have no idea why someone might draw a picture, tell a joke, or think a thought. It isn't for you to determine, either. If you don't like a class of drawings, don't look at them. But until someone is ACTUALLY harmed, mind your own business.
And, btw, actual porn, between adults is far, far more objectionable than any loli. Any! The entire porn industry is rife with drugs abuse, self harm, suicide, mental illness, and using people's mental illnesses, abuse defense mechanisms, and addictions to victimize them. ACTUAL victims.
Both porn and child porn hurt people. ACTUALLY fucking hurt them. Drawings on a paper, art on a screen hurt no one.
As to whether they will or won't eventually do something, that's the justification for thought crimes, and it's not only total bullshit cause you can't see the future or get in the mind of suspects, but once you tolerate treading down the thought crimes path, it will be abused in ways you can't even comprehend. There isn't an artistic renderung put to paper or screen, in the history of humanity, capable of causing the damage that the tolerance of thought crimes will, inevitably, cause.
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 19:18:18 ago (+1/-0)
Well said
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 22:06:51 ago (+1/-0)
FreeinTX 0 points 2 hours ago
that's not the point, dude
the point is that a person that is attracted to kids will try to act out his fantasies because the drawings or the pictures will inflame his/ her desires (there are female pedos too, they do exist)
weak argument the person attracted to minor characters arent doing it for the art of it. most of these ppl have a fetish with the low age model that is being drawn and that fetish is always sexual in nature.
why do you think that they draw it with skimpy clothes if at all? i know what i'm talking about because i have been in the anime subculture and i know for a fact that most if not all guys are sexually stimulated by these drawings. i have seen them in anime forums.
you cannot compare a grown up woman posing nude out of her volution than of a child. are you stupid? porn is shit i agree. but its more tolerable for society that someone would consume sex between consenting adults than actual kids.
lolicon is a disgusting thing a man or a woman should not ever have sexual feelings for any under age characters whether is fiction or reality.
again, those that engage in lolicon will consume sooner or later child porn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors
even jewpedia disagrees with your disgusting stance
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1 monthMar 28, 2024 08:12:43 ago (+0/-1)*
You certainly can't determine that a person is going to hurt a child just because they drew a picture. That's laughably dumb.
I didn't compare adult porn to child porn. I compared the harm caused by adults in porn to the harm caused by people making drawings. A woman, strung out on drugs and/or desperate for money and/or sexually degenerate because she is a sexual abuse victim, doesn't have a "volition" and is harmed far, far greater than any one ever harmed by a drawing.
Yeah, we get it, you think certain drawings are disgusting. Great. But until someone ACTUALLY tries to harm someone, it ain't your business and an honestly free speech site would allow such drawings. They harm no one, have no victim, and are nothing more than lines on a paper or screen.
And no, loli is not illegal. Like you said, you've seen it all over the place, but you can't name a single fucking person in the free world ever convicted and jailed for drawings. Did you even bother to read the link you posted? As for your link's list of countries that have laws about "depicting children". Take another look at what the headline of this thread is. It's specially about how no country allows free speech. Some countries ban holohoax denial. Some countries will prosecute you for hate crimes if you commit a crime and call someone a nigger. And, some countries are trying to make child sex simulations illegal. All of it is fucking dumb.
You said that you were into anime. What about those 3000 year old characters that LOOK like children? Are they better or worse than an actual 21 year old that looks like a child and does actual porn? Do we arrest someone who draws a 3000 year old anime character that looks like a child but not arrest the actual 21 year old that looks like a child doing actual porn?
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 1 monthMar 28, 2024 09:33:45 ago (+1/-0)
sorry the data is there. most of these people at some point will try to harm a kid or to access real child porn. again, there's NO REASON WHATSOEVER why a grown ass person should be attracted to a minor whether is a depiction or 3D as they say
you say that you are christian, the LORD doesnt look good upon pedophiles and yes desire at start at the heart
those are a pretext to draw lolicon content. its wrong to sexualize a minor character. you have deep issues, bro seek help asap.
sorry but you will not change my mind on the subject. no rationalization on this subject will ever change my mind, this shit is dark and disgusting.
there are plenty of cartoons aka anime that doesnt depict minors in sexual innuendos. those who look for this shit are sickos. the end
[ + ] Sal_180
[ - ] Sal_180 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 17:27:18 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 16:04:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] kammmmak
[ - ] kammmmak 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 14:13:52 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 1 point 1 monthMar 27, 2024 12:28:27 ago (+1/-0)