Estimating the prevalence of entrapment in post-9/11 terrorism cases - January 2017
Page 664
D. ENTRAPMENT AMONG THE HIGHEST-PROFILE TERRORISM CASES
Another way of illustrating the significance of this Article’s indicators analysis is to apply it to published lists of the most high-profile terrorism cases. The Heritage Foundation, a prominent conservative think tank, released a list of sixty terrorist attacks and thwarted terrorist plots.256 Four of these involved foreign court systems, rather than U.S. courts; nine were based on real or attempted attacks; two led to no arrests; and one involved a military tribunal rather than the regular U.S. court system.257 Among the remaining forty-four, ten were not plots, as this Article uses the term, but were other types of terrorism offenses, involving such things as sending money to a terrorist group or attending a terrorist training camp abroad.258 Of the remaining thirty-four cases, ten overlap with the plots identified above as being potentially real threats.259 The average number of indicators for the remaining twenty-four cases is 9.2, suggesting that many of these cases are highly problematic. Eighty-two percent of the forty-four defendants in these twenty-four cases had seven or more indicators of entrapment, and 50% had ten or more. Eighty-six percent had three or more of the core six indicators, and 61% had four of more of the core six. Thus, a sizable proportion of cases promoted as noteworthy plots thwarted by counterterrorism authorities in fact show numerous indicators of entrapment. This suggests that such lists of “plots” should be regarded with skepticism, since only a small proportion of cases in this list appear to correspond with real threats of terrorist attacks, as opposed to plots driven by informants or less serious terrorism-related offenses
I'm with agent joe on this one KHK. The FBI doesn't do muslim entrapment anymore, that was so 2016. That's why Joe is here now, cause of "White Supremacy" to entrap retards here. "Muslims are our friends now"...
I agree with Joe here. We aren't voting ourselves out of this mess. That said, lone wolves don't get wrapped up in FBI misdirection and can't be ratted out by a mole.
YOU play the let's keep doing nothing game. Totally not fedposting, that. I don't even agree on the entrapment question. You've asked me leading questions - characteristic of a federal investigator. Questions that have obvious intelligence-national security relevance.
I'm tired of your shit though. So decided to out you. Though admittedly I was only recently told you're a fed.
I asked you to prove that Atomwaffen linked terror plots have all been "fictitious" and "entrapment'.
Now I'm going to 'educate' you as to why your link is bullshit.
- It is from 2016. That was BEFORE the first Atomwaffen linked terror plot.
- Atomwaffen linked terror plots encompass more than the US. In other words in many cases in jurisdictions not under the FBI.
NONE of the OP actually addresses your original claim - that Atomwaffen linked terror plots are all cases of "entrapment" or are "fictitious". Indeed, you just pulled that out of your ass. As we can plainly see with this bullshit offering you've displayed here.
Now, see how easy this is?
Actually, you should be my alt. You're my FBI appointed punching bag. Speedbag more like. A waste of time, though, yes. A DELIBERATE waste of time - definitely yes.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 6 points 1 monthMar 26, 2024 20:29:23 ago (+6/-0)
Page 664
Another way of illustrating the significance of this Article’s indicators analysis is to apply it to published lists of the most high-profile terrorism cases. The Heritage Foundation, a prominent conservative think tank, released a list of sixty terrorist attacks and thwarted terrorist plots.256 Four of these involved foreign court systems, rather than U.S. courts; nine were based on real or attempted attacks; two led to no arrests; and one involved a military tribunal rather than the regular U.S. court system.257 Among the remaining forty-four, ten were not plots, as this Article uses the term, but were other types of terrorism offenses, involving such things as sending money to a terrorist group or attending a terrorist training camp abroad.258 Of the remaining thirty-four cases, ten overlap with the plots identified above as being potentially real threats.259 The average number of indicators for the remaining twenty-four cases is 9.2, suggesting that many of these cases are highly problematic. Eighty-two percent of the forty-four defendants in these twenty-four cases had seven or more indicators of entrapment, and 50% had ten or more. Eighty-six percent had three or more of the core six indicators, and 61% had four of more of the core six. Thus, a sizable proportion of cases promoted as noteworthy plots thwarted by counterterrorism authorities in fact show numerous indicators of entrapment. This suggests that such lists of “plots” should be regarded with skepticism, since only a small proportion of cases in this list appear to correspond with real threats of terrorist attacks, as opposed to plots driven by informants or less serious terrorism-related offenses
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313405013_Estimating_the_prevalence_of_entrapment_in_post-911_terrorism_cases
EAT SHIT... YOU FUCKING KIKE SHILL.
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 2 points 1 monthMar 26, 2024 22:53:09 ago (+2/-0)
Uh-huh. You mean like this guy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNpul-vxYXM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdfBYT3icvM
https://www.glennbeck.com/radio/jan-6-journalist-fbi-arrest
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 2 points 1 monthMar 26, 2024 20:51:50 ago (+2/-0)*
Right Joe?
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 1 point 1 monthMar 26, 2024 20:55:32 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 1 monthMar 26, 2024 20:58:42 ago (+0/-0)
So you have a problem there.
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 2 points 1 monthMar 26, 2024 21:36:30 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 0 points 1 monthMar 27, 2024 06:01:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 1 monthMar 26, 2024 22:21:31 ago (+1/-2)
I'm tired of your shit though. So decided to out you. Though admittedly I was only recently told you're a fed.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 1 monthMar 26, 2024 20:34:32 ago (+1/-2)
More like I'll 'educate' you.
I asked you to prove that Atomwaffen linked terror plots have all been "fictitious" and "entrapment'.
Now I'm going to 'educate' you as to why your link is bullshit.
- It is from 2016. That was BEFORE the first Atomwaffen linked terror plot.
- Atomwaffen linked terror plots encompass more than the US. In other words in many cases in jurisdictions not under the FBI.
NONE of the OP actually addresses your original claim - that Atomwaffen linked terror plots are all cases of "entrapment" or are "fictitious". Indeed, you just pulled that out of your ass. As we can plainly see with this bullshit offering you've displayed here.
Now, see how easy this is?
Actually, you should be my alt. You're my FBI appointed punching bag. Speedbag more like. A waste of time, though, yes. A DELIBERATE waste of time - definitely yes.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 3 points 1 monthMar 26, 2024 20:35:14 ago (+3/-0)
Yet again.