Sign into an existing account

The Jewish trolls here are down voting this so you won't see it.

this is why we need to eliminate downvotes from the sorting algo.

Had this argument endlessly on Reddit years ago.

Obviously reddit WANTED Jewish trolls to be able to hide posts with downvotes. Is that what will happen here?

scott ritter is a pedophile but aside from that the oficial story really stinks
consider this:

Why did the terrorists choose to drive a conspicuous car (foreign license plate)?

Video suggests that there had been more than 4 persons active in the shooting. The getaway car is quite small, so: where is the second vehicle?

Why did the terrorists enter the building. A drive-by shooting in front of the building - before or after the concert, would have been far easier for them to manage. All would have been over in a minute, there would have been no hiding grounds for the crowd being targeted (=more casualties, higher anonymity for themselves..) the decision against the "easy performance" looks like a demonstration of power. "we strike the way we want to."

The terrorists planned to flee from the scene. for this not being identified is a precondition. why didn't they use balaclavas then? again they behaved as if they had diplomatic passports in their pockets. and helpers in the management of the concert hall, who switched off all cctv cams.
The terrorists didn't look like typical is-islamists. None of them had a beard, no suicide bombing, no "alahu akbar" shouts were heard.

The massive stone building caught fire like tinder. Only fire accelerators and lots of gasoline make it ignite that quickly. According to reports by eyewitnesses, the terrorists were carrying large plastic bags with them, that were filled with fluid. Mobilphone videos of the terrorists entering the building are in contrast to these "statements".

Spectators said that, when they tried to flee the concert hall, they found all doors locked. Nevertheless the terrorists (who came late) entered the building without visible problems - and they, this is even more mysterious - were able to leave, when they had finished their bloody work. This indicates, that they had a key or helpers within the security staff.

Police and fire-brigades were late at the scene - although there must have been hundreds of phone calls real time when the shooting started. What is the reason for this delay?

The terrorists did manage to leave the scene - untouched and unchased. to go into hiding in moscow would have been a quick and smart entering wedgee for a successful escape.

There were two men being shown arrested not too far from the Ukrainian border. They were interrogated on spot. it was said, that their car had been stopped by the police - both men fled into a forest where they were caught. This is a circumstantial evidence for an involvement of the Ukraine. But, why should a mastermind in Kiev take such a risk by telling the terrorists to come this way?

The first reports said, that during the arrest " a shot" had been fired. given the fact, that the Moscow terrorists were armed to the teeth, the question arises: why didn't they snow their counterparts under an avalanche of ammunition?


The arrests were made "in the evening of the 22th". pictures show, that this happened in daylight. this is not possible: when the shooting started, it was already past sunset in moscow. who then is/was presented to us there?