Misleading because cancer has always been more prevalent in the western industrialised nations for more than half a century. It’s something to do with either the processed foods or genetics or indeed vaccines but as a whole. As in all the vaccines starting a century ago and the birth control pills.
To draw even a semblance of a relationship between mrna invasion and cancer, we need to see the increased incidences of cancer since 2021 and compare to the previous decades
I also remember news from many years ago saying something about Australia top on cancer because of melanoma or skin cancer due to being under the ozone layer hole. And Australians don't care about the sun.
Makes sense. Them kangas are sun worshipers. Although there’s data showing that avoiding sun is more deleterious than the sun exposure itself, including melanoma
E: also, sunscreens themselves have cancerous chemicals in them, as well as a high percentage of endocrine disruptors that create gender confusion among young children
Not really since it tells you to not trust the science. It tells you that the healthcare system and society is killing you. The mrna is simply the latest "mistake".
No one is denying the healthcare system is more our enemy than a friend. Science used to be great, but whatever they do now is neither good nor science. The point is, we need to use better data in order to draw a relationship between this iteration of a “vaccine” and cancer. Because we know it’s a dangerous thing - this vax - just waiting to strike, we are sometimes too eager to accept shoddy info and data without critical thinking.
Who was it the other day that was saying "Doesn't matter, you're vaxxed, you'll be dead of cancer soon" in relation to the shot being used to spread a "turbo cancer". Does anyone remember what I'm talking about?
My guess was the shot was going to cause some new form of AIDS to manifest in a significant portion of the people who got them within a decade or two. "Turbo cancer" could do it, too, I suppose...
They used different batches with different formulas in different areas for testing purposes. Of course they used diversity hire retards who allowed the shit to sit in the sun all day, every day, when it needs to be below a certain temp, as well as other factors. So who knows how fucked up people will get.
Maybe some got the placebo, some got an over-heated dose that killed it, or made it stronger. Maybe the diversity nigger used the same needle/syringe several times.
Africa has been the pharmaceutical's largest laboratory for quite some time. One day the white man appears with gifts, and money for the leaders. The leaders then force the populace to comply as pharma monitors the results, birth defects, deaths, along with a myriad of other issues noted. The benefit for pharma is that no lawsuits or penalties have to be litigated in court. Then they tweak the formula and start all over again until they believe it's fit for consumption in the western worlds.
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 5 points 1.3 yearsMar 20, 2024 00:05:21 ago (+5/-0)
To draw even a semblance of a relationship between mrna invasion and cancer, we need to see the increased incidences of cancer since 2021 and compare to the previous decades
[ + ] Murdock
[ - ] Murdock 2 points 1.3 yearsMar 20, 2024 02:32:44 ago (+2/-0)
And Australians don't care about the sun.
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 2 points 1.2 yearsMar 20, 2024 10:26:37 ago (+2/-0)*
E: also, sunscreens themselves have cancerous chemicals in them, as well as a high percentage of endocrine disruptors that create gender confusion among young children
[ + ] BrokenVoat
[ - ] BrokenVoat 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 20, 2024 03:52:18 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 20, 2024 10:31:23 ago (+0/-0)
The point is, we need to use better data in order to draw a relationship between this iteration of a “vaccine” and cancer.
Because we know it’s a dangerous thing - this vax - just waiting to strike, we are sometimes too eager to accept shoddy info and data without critical thinking.
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 2 points 1.3 yearsMar 19, 2024 21:36:57 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] BloodyComet
[ - ] BloodyComet 2 points 1.3 yearsMar 19, 2024 21:28:29 ago (+2/-0)
My guess was the shot was going to cause some new form of AIDS to manifest in a significant portion of the people who got them within a decade or two. "Turbo cancer" could do it, too, I suppose...
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 20, 2024 00:35:29 ago (+1/-0)
Maybe some got the placebo, some got an over-heated dose that killed it, or made it stronger. Maybe the diversity nigger used the same needle/syringe several times.
[ + ] Peleg
[ - ] Peleg 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 19, 2024 19:40:40 ago (+1/-0)
BAFFLING!
[ + ] bossman131
[ - ] bossman131 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 20, 2024 11:33:04 ago (+0/-0)
The benefit for pharma is that no lawsuits or penalties have to be litigated in court. Then they tweak the formula and start all over again until they believe it's fit for consumption in the western worlds.
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 20, 2024 01:04:40 ago (+0/-0)
Cancer causing poisons in our wells
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 19, 2024 22:52:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 19, 2024 20:47:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] inaminit
[ - ] inaminit 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 19, 2024 20:29:44 ago (+0/-0)