×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
-3

KIKE FAGGOT NIGGER FILTH

submitted by McNasty to whatever 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 20:41:25 ago (+2/-5)     (whatever)

People that think the world is a ball seem to be confused about gravity. They keep invoking newtonians theory and claiming it as proof of Einstein's theory.

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/gravity-force-complicated/

Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein are locked in an eternal battle over the nature of gravity. Whose side are you on?

what Newton did was to work out the mathematical laws that govern the gravitational attraction between two bodies. The gravitational force depended on the mass of each object and the distance separating them.

Despite the breathtaking success of Newton’s equations, he was never completely satisfied with his theory. He didn’t see the mechanism that would connect two astronomical bodies, like the Moon and the Sun. For forces like picking up a glass, what caused the force was clear. But that wasn’t true for gravity. He was always uncomfortable with this idea of “action at a distance” (action being his word for force). He even wrote to a colleague, telling him that any competent thinker shouldn’t believe his theory.

Regardless, it worked. Astronomers used his equations to predict the motions of planets and comets, as well as the location and timing of solar eclipses.

A quick note here, You can predict the motions of the "planets" because they repeat a frequency cycle over the flat Earth, creating sacred geometry like this.

https://files.catbox.moe/a25z7x.png

The situation changed in 1915, when Albert Einstein devised his own theory of gravity. His ideas were staggeringly different from Newton’s. Einstein imagined that space and time were equivalent, where one could be transformed into the other. Because they were the same, he joined them into a single concept: spacetime.

When Einstein married his spacetime concept with gravity, he found that gravity was actually the distortion of spacetime. Heavy objects like stars and planets distorted spacetime in a way that made objects move toward them, so gravity is simply a result of the geometry of spacetime. As bizarre as this sounds, it has been validated over and over again.

While Einstein’s ideas are very well regarded, they are also known to be incomplete. His theory fails in the subatomic world. When scientists try to use his equations to describe the nature of gravity at atomic scales (and smaller), they fail miserably, predicting non-physical infinities. When a theory predicts something to be infinite, this is a sign not that infinities are real, but that the theory is broken.

Accordingly, researchers have tried to devise a theory of gravity that describes the world of the ultra-small. To do so, they look to theories of electromagnetism and other subatomic forces of the quantum world, which work very well.

The article asks whose side you are on, I am personally on Nikola Tesla's side, but based on Newton's own comments, He would probably agree with Nikola Tesla.

Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.

I also agree with the idea of electromagnetism quantum physics as the law of everything.

Newton's explanation of gravity works terrestrially on earth because he based his theory on the atomic mass of objects. The atomic mass of an object is an average mass for a particular element. This will determine how it is affected by electromagnetism. Although the protons and neutrons are set in stone for an element to be the element it is, electrons have mass and are constantly moving and exchanging places. This is why atomic mass is average and not exact. The number of electrons can vary.

You can see how electrons affect gravity yourself by using a Van de Graaff generator. If you were to touch one, it would draw the electrons out of you. This will leave you with a positive charge. Most of the atoms in your body are heavier than the air around it, even with a positive charge. This is because not all atoms exchange electrons in the same way. For instance, Sulfur can expand its valence shell to hold more than eight electrons, but oxygen cannot. The parts of your body that consist of lighter atoms like your hair, which consists of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, and sulfur, lose enough electrons to where they have less than the molecules in the air around them. When you take volume and divide it by mass, you get density. The loss of electrons make your hair less dense because it lost mass. It is now less dense than the air around it, therefore it will float.


88 comments block


[ - ] oyveyo 4 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 21:26:54 ago (+4/-0)

Hair stands up because the hairs become charged alike, which repells them against each other, which makes them "float" as the electrostatic force moves them apart. It's not because of boyancy.

You are a special kind of lunatic, flerfer

[ - ] McNasty [op] -2 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 21:37:35 ago (+1/-3)

which repells them against each other

No. Your hair is part of your body. It shares a charge with your body. Your individual strands of hair do not have separate charges.

https://www.seattleu.edu/scieng/physics/physics-demos/electricity-and-magnetism/electrostatics---furhair-with-van-de-graaff-generator/#:~:text=Each%20individual%20hair%20has%20the,the%20fur%20and%20the%20dome.

Each individual hair has the same net charge as the rest of the fur and the dome.

You are a special kind of lunatic, flerfer

Did you just learn something from a lunatic?

[ - ] oyveyo 3 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 21:39:50 ago (+4/-1)*

Did you not see where I said "charged alike?"

That's one of your problems; reading comprehension.

I made no claim that the hairs were charged differently. If that were the case, hair would flatten because differently charged objects are attracted.

Charged objects of the same polarity repell each other. Jesus man, this is simple science 101 stuff.

Go ahead and hit me with your next contortion of reason.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -2 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 21:50:06 ago (+1/-3)

Did you not see where I said "charged alike?"

So they're the same as your body? Okay. So they are not pushing away from each other because they have a neutral charge relative to each other.

I made no claim that the hairs were charged differently.

Then explain why a strand of hair that has a neutral charge relative to another strand of hair would want to push away from it?

[ - ] oyveyo 4 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:02:31 ago (+4/-0)*

Boy, what hoops your brain jumps through to twist things up.

Your hand is on the electrostatic generator. It is creating a potential difference on your body, meaning your body is either accumulating excess electrons or starving for them.

Where are these electrons going to be migrating from/to, hmm?

The air around you, because that's what the surface of your body is in contact with. Electrons must flow to/from your hand to other parts of your body (like hair). Without potential difference, there is no flow. Therefore, your body is in a state of imbalance electrically as the charge transfers. Your hair is tens of thousands of entry/exit points for the flow. The flow on each hair gives it a charge. This is where the motion of repelling happens, as the charge on the hair saturates it becomes ionized, thus producing electrostatic force pushing against the other ionized hairs.

There's magnetism involved as well, because magnetic force always exists at a right angle to electrical force, but I'm not getting into that with someone not even grasping the basics. There's even a 3rd force at right angles to the first two, and you are DEFINATELY not ready for that one!

[ - ] McNasty [op] -3 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:17:59 ago (+0/-3)

Boy, what hoops your brain jumps through to twist things up.

Says the faggot with jew slang as a name. Lol.

When you hear the term "opposites attract," it is because electrons will even themselves out with an object that has less electrons.

The reason you believe that the "same attracts" is because the same sides of a magnet push off of each other.

These are two different phenomenons. The magnets push away from each other because of the direction the magnetic field is flowing. This has nothing to do with objects repelling each other that have this same charge. You fuckin retard. Lol.

The air around you, because that's what the surface of your body is in contact with.

Not all atoms treat electrons the same. Do some learning dummy. Oxygen does not take on extra electrons. Cause of this the oxygen in the air around you is not grounded. You are sharing that ungrounded charge with the air around you. Therefore, the atoms in your body that are the same as the atoms in the air are neutral to the air. Your hair!

[ - ] oyveyo 5 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:20:30 ago (+5/-0)*

I'm done, moron.

Keep on truckin' into clueless oblivion.

P.S. " Oxygen does not take on extra electrons" ever heard of ozone? Do you know what an ion is?

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:22:08 ago (+1/-2)

You're never going to learn anything with that attitude.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 02:17:33 ago (+0/-1)

I didn't say molecules didn't take on extra electrons. You need a three-way bond between oxygen atoms for it to have the space to take on an extra electron. Those are facts. Your way out of your depth trying to argue with me.

[ - ] oyveyo 1 point 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 02:53:12 ago (+1/-0)

Your[sic] way out of your depth trying to argue with me

That we can agree on; I don't swim in the kiddie pool.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 0 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 03:05:28 ago (+1/-1)

It's like you're too stupid to understand what an insulator is. It's material that doesn't pass electrons. This is why power lines are above the ground. Cuz the air insulates it from the ground.

Each year, about 1,400 people are killed and 65,000 are injured nationwide because of collisions with some of the 88 million utility poles located within road and street rightsofway. Lol. No motherfucker ever thought about burying them? Lol.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 02:58:54 ago (+0/-1)

That we can agree on; I don't swim in the kiddie pool.

You are retarded though. Thought that oxygen atoms can take on more than eight electrons, not realizing that it needs to be bonded with two other oxygen atoms first. It cannot do it by itself.

But hey, at least you're trying to learn right?

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 13:31:12 ago (+1/-2)

deleted

[ - ] chrimony 3 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 21:54:53 ago (+3/-0)

People that think the world is a ball

Reminder that flattards have to ignore half the night sky: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56ZMZtq0qfY

Star trails over Australia. Two poles on a spherical Earth, one pole in Flattard Land.

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 13:32:52 ago (+1/-2)

deleted

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 13:40:16 ago (+0/-0)

Nope. Your entire cosmology is incorrect.

The southern star trails trivially correspond to a rotating, spherical Earth, flattard. You're literally ignoring half the night sky to keep beleebin' in Flattard Land.

Stop arguing against "disk Earth". Nobody except disinfo shills at FES espouse that nonsense.

Then what shape is it, flattard? You morons say it's flat. Is it a square? An infinite plane? What? And how do you get the southern star trails?

You have Flattard religion.

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 13:42:49 ago (+1/-2)

deleted

[ - ] chrimony 1 point 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 13:55:46 ago (+1/-0)

christ. Sticks, and star trails. That's the entirety of your "science".

I don't know what you mean by the first two, but the last is half the night sky. Only Flattardians have trouble with such a basic observation.

It's also very interesting that you say I have a religion, where it seems like you do.

Because you ignore all reason and evidence to keep beleebin'. Literally half the night sky.

You simply believe what you are told.

I'm just observing the sky, dude. It trivially corresponds to a rotating, spherical Earth.

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 14:21:16 ago (+1/-2)

deleted

[ - ] chrimony 1 point 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 14:22:33 ago (+1/-0)

I don't have to tapdance to explain half the night sky, Flattardian.

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 14:28:49 ago (+1/-2)

deleted

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 14:32:13 ago (+1/-1)

You're projecting, flattard. Half. The. Night. Sky.

[ - ] deleted -2 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 14:33:37 ago (+0/-2)

deleted

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 14:33:18 ago (+0/-1)

You can't explain any of the night sky with the lack of parallax.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 14:40:58 ago (+0/-0)

NPC repeats 2-4.

Why can't you answer the question? "One star at 1 light year. 12 hours. What is the parallax?"

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 14:45:55 ago (+0/-1)

Because it's irrelevant. I'm comparing two stars that are supposedly at two different depths that have the same exact apparent movement.

You ignored the fact that it is not just the earth spinning. How can I take you serious when you just keep pretending like I haven't told you this already?

[ - ] McNasty [op] -2 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 21:58:11 ago (+1/-3)

We went through this dummy. It is a law of perception that the apparent movement of an object will appear to have moved 2x the distance as an object that is twice the distance away from the observer.

https://files.catbox.moe/dipkpn.png

have to ignore half the night sky:

If you tell me that you have a cure for cancer, I don't need to create my own cure to test your cure. If your cure doesn't work then it means we need to keep looking for the cure and stop pretending like we have a cure.

[ - ] chrimony 2 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:33:40 ago (+3/-1)

We went through this dummy.

Indeed we did, flattard. You tried to cope with parallax, and you landed on your flat head:

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=65f3085348086&commentid=65f318f1d053e

From that thread:
1) You confused rotation with side motion.
2) You ignored that parallax can be calculated for a single object.
3) You ignored that 0/2 = 0.
4) You flipped your bits when challenged to do math.

Here it is again, flattard: "One star at 1 light year. 12 hours. What is the parallax? Why can't you answer this question?"

[ - ] McNasty [op] -2 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:36:38 ago (+1/-3)

Lol. You can't stop perception from happening buddy. Not only are we spinning at a thousand miles per hour, but we're revolving around the sun, which is revolving around the Milky Way galaxy, which is itself traveling at 1.3 billion miles per hour. We have seen the same exact stars for the entirety of history. Lol.

Regardless, the laws of perception states that the apparent movement of an object will appear to have moved twice the distance as an object that is twice the distance away from the observer. End of story. You can't change this about reality. There is nothing you can do to change it. Lol.

[ - ] chrimony 3 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:44:34 ago (+4/-1)

NPC repeats 2-4.

Why can't you answer the question? "One star at 1 light year. 12 hours. What is the parallax?"

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2 monthsMar 19, 2024 13:46:23 ago (+1/-2)

deleted

[ - ] big_fat_dangus -1 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 21:52:52 ago (+0/-1)

Hair does not float. If you're trying to explain why hair sometimes stands up, it's due to muscle activity in the skin. https://www.brainfacts.org/brain-anatomy-and-function/body-systems/2019/what-causes-goosebumps-120619

One simple search could have saved you all that typing and proving yourself to be a fucking moron yet again lol.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:01:18 ago (+1/-0)

If you're trying to explain why hair sometimes stands up, it's due to muscle activity in the skin.

No. I'm talking about electrostatics. A Van de Graaff generator. It has nothing to do with muscles. It can make your hair stand up or make styrofoam float. Styrofoam doesn't have muscles.

One simple search could have saved you all that typing and proving yourself to be a fucking moron yet again lol.

You could have done a simple search and learned what a Van de Graaff generator is but you decided to say something retarded instead.

[ - ] big_fat_dangus -1 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:12:57 ago (+0/-1)

It has nothing to do with muscles.

You are wrong. From the article: "The scientific term for hair standing on end is piloerection. It’s a reflex that causes tiny muscles near our hair follicles to contract and raise the hairs. This can be caused by a number of stimuli — for example, a cool breeze on a warm day. This is an evolutionary holdover from when we were hairier and can still be seen in our primate cousins. The cool breeze will cause the hair to raise and then fall back, where it will trap warm air close to the skin and help warm the body back up.

Another cause of piloerection is the sympathetic nervous system. This is a series of autonomous reflexes that are activated when danger is sensed and manages a bunch of physical reactions to get ready for action. In addition to quickening the heart rate and activating the sweat glands, the body raises our hair in order to look bigger and tougher to a potential threat, much like a cat who’s about to fight.

Interestingly, this reaction to danger is also what causes goosebumps from musical stimuli."

Have you even tried to learn to read?

[ - ] McNasty [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:19:24 ago (+1/-0)

From the article: "The scientific term for hair standing on end is piloerection.

Lol. We are talking about two different things. I am talking about the fact that I can manipulate objects with static electricity. I can rub a PVC pipe on some wool and move an aluminum can around without touching it. Take that same pipe and hold it above my head and move my hair without touching it. The aluminum can does not have muscles dummy.

[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:29:57 ago (+0/-0)

Your post is such an incoherent mess it's hard to tell.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:34:29 ago (+1/-0)

be somebody that claims relativities explanation of gravity is rubbish

Copy paste article that tries to explain. Relativity

Get told that the post is an incoherent mess.

I couldn't agree more.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:37:24 ago (+1/-0)

Aren't you the one telling me that these are scalp muscles holding this hair up?

https://files.catbox.moe/y8cpk5.jpg

Lol. Sure buddy.

[ - ] big_fat_dangus -1 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:55:44 ago (+0/-1)

That's just static electricity, retard.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:56:54 ago (+1/-0)

Lol. Well what is static electricity doing to the hair? Is it making it defy gravity?

[ - ] big_fat_dangus -1 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 23:01:24 ago (+0/-1)

Look it up dumbass, it's not that difficult to understand. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bring-science-home-static-electricity-attraction/

Tard wrangling comes at a cost, btw. I'll bill you. In a huge way.

[ - ] McNasty [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 23:04:12 ago (+1/-0)

I'm talking about electrostatics. You know, static electricity?

Why do you keep talking about goosebumps? I am specifically talking about THE Van de Graaff generator that can give a person a positive static charge and make their hair stand up. I am claiming that the hair is standing up because your hair has less electrons than the air around it.

[ - ] MasklessTheGreat -1 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 21:51:50 ago (+1/-2)

All I’m going to say is that I don’t understand how Earth is orbiting the sun while the sun is traveling through space and however fucking fast. All of this while the whole damn galaxy is moving around. With all of that shit moving around however it moves, EVERY FUCKING STAR IS AT THE SAME FUCKING SPOT ON THE SAME DAY EVERY YEAR!!! It makes absolutely no fucking sense to believe globe earth, the solar system, outer space and all that shit when you can verify all of it isn’t true with your own fucking eyeballs. No theories or mathematics required.

[ - ] big_fat_dangus 1 point 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 21:55:29 ago (+1/-0)

It makes no sense to you because you are a retard with a learning disability. Same as all flat tards.

[ - ] oyveyo 1 point 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:55:47 ago (+1/-0)*

You can't see with your eyeballs the distance required to detect motion between stars in your lifetime. We see our small "corner" of the galaxy throughout our lives, and yes, everything we see seems to be stationary relative to each other... but that's like being adrift in an ocean current. You can see other objects floating nearby, and their position doesn't seem to change from your viewpoint, but as a group you are travelling in a vast ocean beyond your senses. If you could see yourself from space, it would be obvious that you and everything around you is in motion. The pyramids in Egypt were built aligned to certain stars, which since then have moved. It's all about scale of space and scale of time.

Btw, I don't believe in space or time. Reality is an illusion. Our "minds" interpret waveforms to construct "reality". My reality is different than yours, but we share aspects because we both recieve similar inputs, but nothing (except energy waves) actually exists beyond that which the mind creates.

For some reason that is unknown to me, we must all play the "reality" game regardless of our awareness that it's all a grand illusion.

If I get hit by a car, well that would seem to be real, wouldn't it? Even so, it's not real unless my mind, or the influence of other minds, makes it so. The influence of other minds affects your mind because we are all connected, and our aggregated determinations ripple through those around us. So while I, the individual, should be able to stand in traffic and let cars pass through me, that's not going to easily happen with the connection to others influencing how I want reality to be, and since birth my mind has been conditioned to adhere to the rules of reality. It's not impossible to let cars pass through you without a scratch, just highly unlikely, due to preconcieved notions about what is real.

We are each and every one gods. We were created in "his" image. That means we, all of us combined, everything, is the image of god. We are god. God is us.

That's my interpretation, your mileage may vary (pun intended).

[ - ] McNasty [op] -2 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 21:55:03 ago (+0/-2)

I don’t understand how Earth is orbiting the sun while the sun is traveling through space and however fucking fast.

It's a retarded concept. The faggots shills here are forced into defending the jew Einstein against the white man Nikola Tesla's "defamation." Just pay attention to all the people that give you shit about being a flat earther. You probably remember going through the same exact thing when you learned about the Holocaust.

[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 0 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:25:59 ago (+1/-1)

You always know when not to discuss topics with somewhen when their immediate response is ridicule. It’s not worth my time to explain anything to someone like that because past history shows that a civil discussion is not possible with them. It’s why I’m not going to engage big_fat_dangus. An immediate jump to calling names. Not going to bother with that.

[ - ] McNasty [op] -1 points 2 monthsMar 18, 2024 22:31:43 ago (+0/-1)

It’s not worth my time to explain anything to someone like that

Depends how you look at it. I don't mind calling these people retards all day while I sharpen my knowledge. For instance, I was talking about Eratosthenes the other day and somebody tried to bring up that Aristarchus already figured out the size and distance of the sun before Eratosthenes made his observation. I didn't hear that one yet so I researched it and found this out.

How did Aristarchus calculate the distance to the Sun?

Aristarchus realized that when the Moon was exactly half illuminated, it formed a right triangle with the Earth and the Sun. Now knowing the distance between the Earth and the Moon, all he needed was the angle between the Moon and Sun at this moment to compute the distance of the Sun itself.

Ok, so how did he know the distance between the Earth and the Moon?

Aristarchus timed how long the Moon took to travel through Earth's shadow and compared this with the time required for the Moon to move a distance equal to its diameter.

Just another example of circular reasoning I can point out to people irl. I red pill all kinds of people about it in real life and the amount of knowledge I possess about the subject is solely because of jewish shills.