Sign into an existing account

In 1887, Mickelson and Morley performed an experiment that compared the speed of light in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter through the luminiferous aether ("aether wind").

Context for this experiment.

They were making two presumptions. One being that aether exists, and the other being the earth is revolving around the sun.

Keep in mind, this is 1887. 70 years before Russia would launch the first satellite. The earth revolving around the sun is only a presumption at this time. A strange one because there was absolutely no evidence to suggest it was a fact. And all the top scientists subscribed to the aether.


So they take their variables, their presumed speed of the Earth revolving around the Sun, and the presumed resistance aether would have on matter and conduct the experiment. The results come in. It can be interpreted two different ways.

1. no significant difference between the speed of light in the direction of movement through the presumed aether, and the speed at right angles.

2. no significant difference between the speed of light in the direction of presumed movement through the aether, and the speed at right angles.

Given that this was 1887, 70 years before the first satellite launch, You would think they would have went with number 2. Instead, they tried to explain the null result by saying the aether dilated the measuring equipment causing the results to appear as though the Earth is not revolving around the sun.

The only evidence of this claim is the fact that you got a null result when testing your presumption of the earth's revolution. This explanation was a big problem for those that was trying to push the heliocentric model but they stuck with it until there globe messiah arrived.

In 1905, a THEORETICAL PHYSICISTS, Albert Einstein addresses the issue for heliocentricity. He claimed that aether didn't exist and that two separate objective realities can occur simultaneously. He claims that because of this, the Mickelson and Morley experiment actually did give the results that they predicted, but the only way to observe those results has to be from outside the perspective of our reality.

You heard that right. There is absolutely no way to confirm what he said in this reality.

The train car thought experiment.

You are in a train car that is traveling at the speed of light. On the far end of each side of the car is a window. You stand in a t-pose in the center of the car with a gun in each hand pointing at each window. You fire the guns simultaneously. Which window breaks first?

If you're already traveling at the speed of light, how can you propel a bullet any faster? What would you experience inside the car? What would a bystander experience outside the car? Apparently, your relative position would present you with the illusion that you're not traveling faster than the speed of light, therefore, both windows will shatter at the same time. But the bystander is watching the train travel at the speed of light, therefore, if they could see through the wall of the train car and see you fire the gun, they would see the bullet A that is heading in the same direction that the train is traveling, move faster than the speed of light but bullet B is traveling towards the back of the train that is traveling at the speed of light towards it. Therefore, the bystander sees the back window break first.

All of this is just theoretical bullshit to explain a null result. Einstein is saying that Earth is the train car that is giving us the null result and be assured that they got the correct result from the bystander. In 1905. 52 years before the first satellite was ever launched by Soviet jew communist Russia.

So in a nutshell, the special theory of relativity is a jew, telling you that two separate objective realities can simultaneously exist because the reality we observe shows a null result and the reality that happens outside our perception of reality shows Einstein's results.

I'll finish it off with a quote from Nikola Tesla.