×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
6
6 comments block


[ - ] SithEmpire 2 points 1.3 yearsFeb 9, 2024 02:52:12 ago (+2/-0)

About as real as the gas chamber proof which, upon David Irving offering a bounty for said proof, a court ordered him to pay without a scrap of evidence.

Its legal system considered that particular point proven automatically, so legally zero evidence is sufficient to claim the bounty.

Even a non-jew court will set aside some facts or witnesses to make it more conducive to justice than to the truth.

[ - ] Sector2 2 points 1.3 yearsFeb 8, 2024 23:37:23 ago (+2/-0)

In closing arguments, Mann’s lawyer John Williams compared the climate deniers in this case to election deniers overall. “Why do Trumpers continue to deny that he won the election?” he asked the jury. “Because they truly believe what they say or because they want to further their agenda?”

He openly admits his case is fraudulent.

[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 2 points 1.4 yearsFeb 8, 2024 22:21:08 ago (+2/-0)

The trial was about defamation, a difficult thing to prove by a plaintiff, not about the validity of climate change. Get your post title right.

[ - ] Warden 1 point 1.3 yearsFeb 9, 2024 00:54:28 ago (+1/-0)

I didn’t know Michael Mann had sued someone else other than Tim Ball, he’s such a POS. I’m not shocked the jewdicial system sided with him finally….when Michael Mann Sued Tim Ball and lost, Tim basically proved Michael’s hockey stick graph depicting carbon output was utter bullshit, leaving out decades of cooling data, which makes no sense if aggregate CO2 causes global warming. I was shocked Tim won that case even though he sort of lost it in the end after the court costs destroyed him financially, but either way, it was huge win for real science.

[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 0 points 1.3 yearsFeb 9, 2024 00:52:32 ago (+0/-0)

I always hoped Mark Steyn would get Rush's radio show time slot but they gave it to a couple of bumblefucks.