×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
5
4 comments block


[ - ] Peleg 1 point 2 monthsFeb 6, 2024 19:55:39 ago (+1/-0)

I usually could care less about the "aristocracy", but that was interesting.
Thank you for posting it.
It gets me to wondering, what might have been different had this young fellow been allowed to rule?

[ - ] dulcima [op] 1 point 2 monthsFeb 6, 2024 23:04:47 ago (+1/-0)

History is fascinating, isn't it? We are where we are today because of shit that happened before we were born.

[ - ] Panic 0 points 2 monthsFeb 6, 2024 21:26:18 ago (+0/-0)

The royal family are all full of bastards, all mixed thickly with jews for centuries. Queen Elizabeth asked Charles to DNA test his sons, seeing that one was a ginger. Charles refused to allow the test, knowing full well that NEITHER boy was his own blood.

While Charles was fucking Camilla, lonely Diana had to go find boyfriends on the side and her kids have two diferent fathers. Charles has no kids at all.

So expecting any modern British ruler to be related by blood to any earlier monarch is just high hopes.

[ - ] dulcima [op] 1 point 2 monthsFeb 6, 2024 23:03:04 ago (+1/-0)

Charles just needs to give his royal permission for the DNA. They found Richard III's skeleton some years ago and he is the uncle of the two boys (if indeed they are the sons of Edward IV, Richard's brother).

There are also Woodville descendants.