Like the idea but seems to ambitious. Start with something like a website that collect data on current airlines, their hiring policies, or their pilots currently flying. Data about planes is found online. Which registered plane is used for which flight. If we could now find out who will pilot that plane and make it public. Then we could choose flights with the pilots of our choice.
You guys know that a pilot doesn't actually fly a plane anymore right? The instruments and technology on a plane practically allow them to fly themselves. So unless you are hoping on an old-school plane or boarding a plane with a politician who may have angered some kikes, you don't have much to worry about.
[ - ] germ22 1 point 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 19:20:13 ago (+1/-0)
That is mostly true in good conditions. If something unforeseen happens, like a bird strike, engine stall or whatever, that is when pilots are still needed. And that is when I want the best pilot available.
You'd be challenging established law that's been decided over and over again since the 70's.
You can't discriminate on the basis of race, simple as. You'd be sued, day 1, lose by day 2, ordered to pay everything you have day 3, and the nogs would burn your house down day 4, and no one would give a shit.
You can't discriminate on the basis of race, simple as. You'd be sued, day 1, lose by day 2, ordered to pay everything you have day 3, and the nogs would burn your house down day 4, and no one would give a shit.
I was referring to the idea of starting a website that listed pilots/flight attendants and other details about what various airlines supported (DEI).
Thats my fault. I should have specified who I was answering.
DEI will die out as the discrimination lawsuits work their way through the court system.
maybe, but I think what we're actually seeing is a "two-steps 'forward' one step back" of all the shit policies and governance that got us here. I could be wrong (but unfortunately I'm probably not) that the court system is just the slow-walk version of what we have in the uniparty regime. Things get too hot, they backtrack in the courts, and then go forward with the plan a generation or even just a decade later.
To confirm this we only have to look at every other time we were winning in the courts in the past 10, 20, 30, 40 years. Still ended up here. Like being eaten by the blob. Wherever you fight it, it just backs off, and moves forward again, but slower. Loss by attrition and all that jazz.
That's assuming it is a public company. If it's a private invite only club, whose members' information is kept private, then you won't have any issues as they can't prove you are discriminating.
Simply put, an "aircraft club" is made, and only club members can fly using club aircraft.
You're not being creative enough. The club only allows new members in after an in person "psych" test. The test has a bunch of odd questions that are "supposed so determine a persons motives", but in truth are just an excuse to not allow people in. The excuse for this test is obvious, since club members will be flying, and some trained to pilot, it needs to be ensured "they are of sound mental health". Before any of this becomes a problem, a group of niggers who know how to keep their mouth shut are found and given a small retainer with the promise of a larger amount of cash should "the state fraudulently peruse diversity issues".
Then when the state starts screeching that you didn't let any of their niggers into your club. You say "that the fact that the state hired them to join the club to investigate possible diversity issues is more than likely why they failed the psych test. They were not joining for normal reasons and so their behavior was abnormal." Then you bring out the niggers you hired to be actors, and say "see we allow everyone into our club so long as they are mentally sound". The state grumbles for a while realizing they just got out jewed, but ultimately drops the issue, as it's not worth their time.
Of course, none of this may even be an issue as discriminatory clubs are allowed, and private airplanes and airlines are also legal.
I've actually been toying with the idea of getting my ATP. The problem isn't the just plane, it's the insurance; they don't want people doing this so they make sure to penalize you harshly for the attempt. I could get a beautiful DC-3 with a cabin that looks like a lounge for about $600,000. It's thirsty and in order to justify the expenses, you'd probably need to bring a number of passengers with you from another charter service. My angle would be luxury transport without the hassle of TSA or corporate DEI concerns... Though marketing would be a tightrope, I think it can be conveyed. IDK. Likely a pipe dream.
Be prepared to fight the regime. And not just legally, you will have to have enough firepower to scare off local goons and guard against shenanigans. And you'd have to check each flight for shenanigans.
That being said, I'd fly on it if I could avoid the TSA. Don't even care about paying more as I wouldn't use it often anyways.
You'll want to start with a small fleet of passenger aircraft that operate primarily in Africa, Asia, and Latin-America. You'll also want to create a members only subscription app service to provide both reliable ground transportation service and secure lodging. You'll be able to build a good amount of income if you become the only air carrier in Africa allowed to fly into and out of the EU.
Eventually, you'll receive complaints about your hiring, so I strongly recommend that you consider setting your headquarters in Ethiopia and buy an existing Ethiopian commercial air freight shipper.
Assuming such a thing would even be allowed to exist, I would genuinely be interested in how popular it would be. Would it become the most popular airline that no one would publicly admit to flying on? Or would all of the whites cuck out for fear of being called racist?
[ - ] prototype 1 point 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 13:14:55 ago (+1/-0)
Or would all of the whites cuck out for fear of being called racist?
All the ones that do are irrelevant. It's the ones that don't bow down, that can be used a a lever to embarrass the regime and complicate narratives to the regime's expense.
[ + ] germ22
[ - ] germ22 7 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 11:05:17 ago (+7/-0)
Start with something like a website that collect data on current airlines, their hiring policies, or their pilots currently flying.
Data about planes is found online. Which registered plane is used for which flight. If we could now find out who will pilot that plane and make it public. Then we could choose flights with the pilots of our choice.
[ + ] GetFuckedCunt
[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 1 point 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 18:42:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] germ22
[ - ] germ22 1 point 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 19:20:13 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 18:32:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 11:56:06 ago (+4/-0)
We don't have the freedom of association anymore.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 3 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 13:13:48 ago (+3/-0)
Which is why the imposition should be challenged to begin with.
you don't have any rights you fail to attempt to assert.
Just the act of asserting them makes a spectacle and raises questions the regime doesn't want raised.
Freedom is in the courage to try, no matter what the outcome is, or how inevitable it may seem.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 14:40:59 ago (+2/-0)
You can't discriminate on the basis of race, simple as. You'd be sued, day 1, lose by day 2, ordered to pay everything you have day 3, and the nogs would burn your house down day 4, and no one would give a shit.
But go ahead, try it.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 14:43:39 ago (+0/-0)
I was referring to the idea of starting a website that listed pilots/flight attendants and other details about what various airlines supported (DEI).
Thats my fault. I should have specified who I was answering.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 14:48:48 ago (+1/-0)
No pilot is going to want to be associated with people openly discriminating. Flight attendants? Why not include strippers and hookers, too. :)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 15:13:05 ago (+0/-0)
maybe, but I think what we're actually seeing is a "two-steps 'forward' one step back" of all the shit policies and governance that got us here. I could be wrong (but unfortunately I'm probably not) that the court system is just the slow-walk version of what we have in the uniparty regime. Things get too hot, they backtrack in the courts, and then go forward with the plan a generation or even just a decade later.
To confirm this we only have to look at every other time we were winning in the courts in the past 10, 20, 30, 40 years. Still ended up here. Like being eaten by the blob. Wherever you fight it, it just backs off, and moves forward again, but slower. Loss by attrition and all that jazz.
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 18:34:23 ago (+0/-0)
It'd be a new kind of inflight entertainment.
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 16:26:29 ago (+0/-0)
Simply put, an "aircraft club" is made, and only club members can fly using club aircraft.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 2 monthsFeb 2, 2024 14:04:24 ago (+0/-0)
They definitely could if you ever accepted new members.
But even so, if you wanted to use airports and only had Whites at your gate, that would be noticed.
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 0 points 2 monthsFeb 2, 2024 22:18:20 ago (+0/-0)
Before any of this becomes a problem, a group of niggers who know how to keep their mouth shut are found and given a small retainer with the promise of a larger amount of cash should "the state fraudulently peruse diversity issues".
Then when the state starts screeching that you didn't let any of their niggers into your club. You say "that the fact that the state hired them to join the club to investigate possible diversity issues is more than likely why they failed the psych test. They were not joining for normal reasons and so their behavior was abnormal." Then you bring out the niggers you hired to be actors, and say "see we allow everyone into our club so long as they are mentally sound". The state grumbles for a while realizing they just got out jewed, but ultimately drops the issue, as it's not worth their time.
Of course, none of this may even be an issue as discriminatory clubs are allowed, and private airplanes and airlines are also legal.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 2 monthsFeb 2, 2024 22:22:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 0 points 2 monthsFeb 3, 2024 04:14:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 3 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 12:01:39 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 2 monthsFeb 2, 2024 14:06:26 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] letsgetit
[ - ] letsgetit 1 point 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 16:00:28 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 1 point 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 15:31:48 ago (+1/-0)*
The problem isn't the just plane, it's the insurance; they don't want people doing this so they make sure to penalize you harshly for the attempt.
I could get a beautiful DC-3 with a cabin that looks like a lounge for about $600,000.
It's thirsty and in order to justify the expenses, you'd probably need to bring a number of passengers with you from another charter service.
My angle would be luxury transport without the hassle of TSA or corporate DEI concerns... Though marketing would be a tightrope, I think it can be conveyed.
IDK.
Likely a pipe dream.
https://www.trade-a-plane.com/search?category_level1=Multi+Engine+Piston&make=DOUGLAS&model=DC-3C&listing_id=2425882&s-type=aircraft
[ + ] Leveraction
[ - ] Leveraction 1 point 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 12:15:40 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] DeusLoVult
[ - ] DeusLoVult 0 points 2 monthsFeb 2, 2024 09:07:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 18:43:56 ago (+0/-0)
That being said, I'd fly on it if I could avoid the TSA. Don't even care about paying more as I wouldn't use it often anyways.
[ + ] carnold03
[ - ] carnold03 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 18:42:03 ago (+0/-0)
Eventually, you'll receive complaints about your hiring, so I strongly recommend that you consider setting your headquarters in Ethiopia and buy an existing Ethiopian commercial air freight shipper.
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 18:36:52 ago (+0/-0)
G roup
P reference
Airlines
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 18:32:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Shotinthedark2
[ - ] Shotinthedark2 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 17:58:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Feelsgood
[ - ] Feelsgood 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 15:51:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 15:48:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 2Drunk
[ - ] 2Drunk 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 15:45:51 ago (+0/-0)
I actually like the idea. An airlines run by and flown by white people for white people. With no nigger tsa agents either.
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 14:04:11 ago (+0/-0)
Just name any company White Power _anything_ and when the Employment Commission questions you just tell them no black people applied.
[ + ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior
[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 0 points 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 12:12:19 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 1 point 2 monthsFeb 1, 2024 13:14:55 ago (+1/-0)
All the ones that do are irrelevant. It's the ones that don't bow down, that can be used a a lever to embarrass the regime and complicate narratives to the regime's expense.