☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
18

FDA eliminates informed consent

submitted by Conspirologist to Health 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 03:44:58 ago (+19/-1)     (www.federalregister.gov)

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/12/21/2023-27935/institutional-review-board-waiver-or-alteration-of-informed-consent-for-minimal-risk-clinical



13 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] TheYiddler 4 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 07:23:45 ago (+4/-0)

Reading this, the proposal was open to comments from the public and it received less than 50. We need dedicated autists to find these proposals so we can call them faggots and see their response in the detailed report.

[ - ] Peleg 4 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 07:57:35 ago (+4/-0)

Or they could just be lying about that.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 3 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 08:53:57 ago (+3/-0)

Yeah, they definitely give a single flying fuck what we have to say and would totally act on our opinions.

[ - ] SocksOnCats 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 12:03:55 ago (+2/-0)

Holy shit this is awful. This opens an enormous slippery slope for the FDA and TPTB to do anything they want to the general public without our knowledge.

This also means they can fuck with our food in more direct ways and never have to tell us. I'm betting it means they can legally leave things out of the ingredients list - they just don't have to tell you.

This is very very bad.

[ - ] prototype 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 13:08:33 ago (+0/-0)

This is very very bad.

If I were a bolder man, and not a pacifist, I would go as far to say that someone should straight up die for allowing this.

Thankfully I'm against violence.

But seriously, some officials should be seeing protests outside where they work, and/or the inside of prison cells, for decades.

[ - ] SocksOnCats 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 13:12:40 ago (+1/-0)

I agree. We need to start naming names and providing information about those named names.

WHO proposed the bill?
WHO wrote the bill?
WHO financed the bill?
Where do these people LIVE and WORK?
WHO are these people’s loved ones?

[ - ] dassar 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 14:43:55 ago (+2/-0)

Curious What is their definition of 'Minimal risk' ?/.

I remember someone posted a document of social media that the vaxx manufactures had a working technical definition that 'safe and effective' literally meant 'something that didn't kill you 100% of the time'.

[ - ] Leveraction 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 12:33:01 ago (+0/-0)

How convenient. One more reason to distrust fda, cdc, nih.
Btw, who became God to decide what is "minimal" risk since every individual react different to meds?

[ - ] VitaminSieg 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 23:30:08 ago (+0/-0)

Lol what are they gonna do, put fluoride in the drinking water?

[ - ] Prairie -3 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 06:31:47 ago (+0/-3)

Just more fuel for the anti-everythingtards. Maybe it's intentional, want to make them even more paranoid.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 08:54:21 ago (+2/-0)

Imagine being pro-anything except your own race.

[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 31, 2024 08:26:35 ago (+0/-0)

anti-everythingtards are making the submissive masses look like fucking idiots.