×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
-3

Anyone got the Taylor Swift AI nudes?

submitted by CoronaHoax to AskUpgoat 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 12:23:27 ago (+4/-7)     (AskUpgoat)



17 comments block


[ - ] Xantha 8 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 12:40:21 ago (+8/-0)

Stop looking at porn and definitely dont look at some gross blown out pop stars cooch with some fake Internet nudes.

[ - ] CoronaHoax [op] 0 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 13:19:17 ago (+2/-2)

I shouldn't have to defend myself because you're gay.

They are going to use them to take away your first amendment rights on the internet. Take a look at the coordinated all media outlet blitz on it right now.

[ - ] SumerBreeze 3 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 15:22:27 ago (+3/-0)

Shut up retard. No one is taking any rights away because of pictures no one cares about.

Now go watch this
https://files.catbox.moe/gj93i5.mp4

[ - ] CoronaHoax [op] 1 point 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 16:02:35 ago (+1/-0)

https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=Taylor+Swift+AI+Nudes

Nah no coordinated flash media operation to make laws banning content posted online.

[ - ] SumerBreeze 1 point 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 19:21:22 ago (+1/-0)

google is one company and has already been actively censoring and blocking AND EVEN PUSHING FALSE INFORMATION.

we already know that they coordinate with the FBI and MOSSAD. Same with Facebook twitter and other social and news sites.

[ - ] shitface9000 4 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 17:16:04 ago (+4/-0)

I don't think there really are any TS nudes. It's a hoax to drum up support for AI censhorship.

[ - ] Niggly_Puff 0 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 18:09:46 ago (+0/-0)

[ - ] Fascinus 2 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 15:58:12 ago (+2/-0)

[ - ] Sector2 1 point 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 20:08:09 ago (+1/-0)

It's just another angle of the Taylor Swift psyop. After citing her as one of the ideal candidates, it looks like they (CIA) went ahead and chose her.

[ - ] KDs_Other_Burner 1 point 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 16:37:34 ago (+1/-0)

It wasn't hard to find them. Your paranoia over whether they exist or not does you no credit whatsoever.

Here's your fake, AI generated fap material.

https://9jaflaver.com/ai-generated-nude-photos-of-taylor-swift-trending-online-18-photos/

[ - ] CoronaHoax [op] -1 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 16:52:56 ago (+0/-1)

lol look what this does. Now they want to take your first amendment rights away over that? I guess you preferred to just let them because seeing it would make you uncomfortable. Maybe someone somewhere would fap over it ya know.

[ - ] KDs_Other_Burner 2 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 18:29:08 ago (+2/-0)

You're a weird faggot. Lay off the weed.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 0 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 13:47:17 ago (+0/-0)

Suck off to reddit

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 13:41:05 ago (+0/-0)

Why would anyone want fake nudes?

[ - ] CoronaHoax [op] 0 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 16:03:42 ago (+0/-0)

They probably aren't even real if you were able to ask the question.

There is a flash media operation to make laws about "Taylor Swift's AI Nudes that were posted".

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 16:06:43 ago (+0/-0)

Fwiw sometimes fakes are real. Bella Thorne's masturbation video for example. She denied it was her. But she did it.

Will see a lot more of this stuff soon. Jacking off in public is also becoming as common as open drug use...

[ - ] CoronaHoax [op] 1 point 3 monthsJan 29, 2024 16:14:01 ago (+1/-0)

I don't think Taylor Swift even has a vagina.

I just find it disturbing that supposedly we're supposed to be able to find anything but nobody knows where these "nudes" are that supposedly hundreds of thousands have seen and not a single post anywhere has them.

Either they have control enough to keep whatever they want from being seen by everyone, including just fake nudes that 100s of thousands have already seen, from places including even this, or they're running an anti 1A op on literally something that didn't even happen at all.

Streisand affect doesn't count / work here?