Sign into an existing account

I agree with him, but on one condition: he, his family and his friends all get GPS monitors attached to all of their vehicles for a year. The GPS data is always publically available.

If, after one year, nobody has gone 10 over the limit, then he an institute it for the rest of his community. One year after that, his locality, and after another year for the state.

What's that you say, (((Socc Wiener))), value your privacy too much? Afraid to tell the public where you are? Oh, what a shame.

This is going to require knowing the location of every vehicle on the road. So no.

Limit the age of consent to 10 over and watch that filthy kike kvetch like none other.

It's a terrible idea because not being able to accelerate in itself can create hazards

See this faggot lives in San Fran. He doesn't drive, doesn't know anyone who does. They uber from faggot bath house to faggot orgy location to faggot Cal Gov't meetings.

Besides being the sole reason to hate on faggots, degenerates, and jews (but I repeat myself); he wants to fuck up your life as much as possible. Those people living in Salinas, farmers, truckers, people who get their hands dirty....those people are "icky" to him, and we're better off if he and his jew ilk squash them down as much as possible.

Oh, and ain't nobody driving over 10 mph against the speed limit in ANY fucking SF neighborhood; the streets are too congested and traffic--all the heteros should be using public transport anyway. The people in the suburbs are also to be visibly shamed and levies put against them because they don't live in the city. Regardless of his obscene fantasy of being kidnapped by a car full of alpha 20-ish year old males and driven extremely fast to a remote area, all the while performing disgusting sexual acts on them.

Yeah, that last part was gross, but you know faggot has it as his go-to.

The current speed limits are a joke. I got shit to do. You want you're car fixed don't you? Go as slow as you want, just get the fuck out of my way you stupid motherfuckers. Oh and PS keep your fucking kids off the road. The world is not a playground.

How about we introduce his bill along side the the "Throw Scott Weiner into the Arctic Ocean bill", we put both to a public vote and whichever gets more votes becomes law.

The bandwagon fallacy. Because "most people" want something it doesn't necessarily mean they will or even ought to get it. "Most people" want the government to fuck off stop taxing them for fun and respect the constitution. "Most people" want courts to stop trying to make new law through bullshit reinterpretation.

"Most people" want fifty cent gas. "Most people" think we should disband the military and defund the police.

The fact is "most people" are retarded with fuck all understanding of anything outside their own narrow sphere of interest. Any proposal that uses the bandwagon fallacy should be examined extremely closely on its (lack of) merit.

"Hey kid."

"Yeah?"

"You the local hacker/computer guy?"

"Yeah."

"Can you fix this governor for me?"

"It'll cost you $20 and a 6-pack."

"Deal."


Or do it yourself, if so inclined. Still, it sucks to have to rip out/hack your own shit all the fucking time to disable shit like this. There's a reason I don't own new vehicles.

While I disagree with this as A) any way the government would implement this would be done in the most incompetent way possible resulting in massive unintended consequences, and B) any authority extended to the government is eventually abused in the worst way possible, I do agree that the current system we have is incredibly flawed. There is absolutely no good reason the most dangerous activity that most people engage in during their daily lives, by orders of magnitude, is traveling from point A to B in a car.

I don't know the answer really, but I have been leaning towards draconian levels of enforcement of the current laws, as unpopular and beset with its own problems as that would be. We would have to majorly, majorly reform how officers investigate unrelated crimes during traffic stops for one. And it would be extremely cost prohibitive, as the administrative overhead would massively outweigh any amount of revenue from fines. Amongst other issues. I've also been kicking around a carrot and stick routine, where driving poorly would be prohibitively expensive while driving safely would be financially rewarding, though I have my doubts as to this working looking at how ineffective the insurance system seems to be at inticing people to not drive stupidly.

Regardless though, we need some massive stop-gap measure between now and the proliferation of self-driving vehicles. Not only to reduce injuries and fatalities, but also to help alleviate traffic and stamp out the ways that drivers make road travel so inefficient.