Much of what we shame blacks and jews for are in fact white behaviors.
We were indoctrinated with a psychology of weakness by the kikes and now we have the majority of the far right clinging to it, pretending it is "the morality of the white man", it's not, it's a Jewish creation that was imposes upon us.
When we hold them in contempt for violating the set of rules they had made up for us to destroy ourselves by following, we look like clowns.
The peope of europe and America did not become as great as they did by following the rules of "white virtues" they did it by taking the most effective approach to getting what they wanted, they cared for and aided their own ingroups while not being concerned for any outgroups.
You are so out of touch with your ancestors, yet you claim to exalt their glory. You try to incorporate Jewish ideals that are proven to be destructive to you into a platform of white strength. And you judge other groups by the standards of this retarded worldview that they had programmed you with (to handicap you).
Let's say that this is indeed nigger psychology, how's it working out for them?
Society bends over backwards for them, and I'm bit just talking about major institutions, I'm talking about the average individual.
There are only two types of tactics, the better kinds and the worse ones. It's retarded not to pick up the enemy's gun when it has been shown to be more effective than yours.
Right makes right. It’s the fundamental fucking premise of the scientific revolution. 2+2≠5 just because someone stronger than you beat you unconscious because you didn’t say so. Not allowing personal opinions to dictate reality is what raised us above animals.
psychology of weakness
Literally not what we’re talking about. “Might makes right” and “oy vey goyim you can’t kill your enemies or use violence for anything” aren’t even remotely the same topic.
[act like niggers to beat niggers; act like jews to beat jews; surely this won’t turn you into them!]
You’re not; why should I? Fuck off with that shit. Either you support the continued existence of the white race or you support no violence. There aren’t any other options.
I support doing whatever works when pursuing a goal, including violence. But we've been talking about some happening, shtf, of Boogaloo going down for two decades. That's all that this kind of bravado is, just idle talk with little to back it. We got no organization, not even able to count on the commitment of our peers, we have no preparations, and we have no plan.
Psyche (animating power) generates resistance; Logy (reasoning over affixed while ignoring animation) spends resistance. In other words...nature implies generator; those within re-generators aka action/reaction. Resisting each other makes one weak; while resisting temptations grows resistance.
clinging to it
Perceivable implies need to let go; suggested tempts want to hold onto...resisting want grows needed resistance.
the morality
Consenting to suggested the-ism implies ones submission to another; hence following suggested norms; rules of behaviors; manners of conduct; laws of men etc.
On the other hand...natural order (inception towards death) generates resistance (life).
was imposed upon us.
Consenting to suggested positions it within oneself willingly, while one holds onto it. Ones free will of choice has to take it on; others cannot impose upon ones choice. It's a mercantile contract between buying (consent) and selling (suggestion).
Meanwhile; nature forces perceivable through each ones perception, which implies ones choice to adapt (need) or ignore (want) it for suggested.
individual
Aka within (in) division (divi) two (dual)...being implies one (perception) within oneness (perceivable). It's ones consent (want or not want) to suggested; which divides ones against one another within conflicts of reason (want versus not want).
Individual implies reasoning against one another; being implies unit (Latin unitas; unus; one) within sound (entire; whole).
the average
AV'ERAGE, noun - "in commerce, a contribution to a general loss"...others suggest averages to tempt one to ignore that loss (inception towards death) generates growth (life). Hence not a contribution of many; but an attribution of each one.
there are only two...
There can be (partial) only one (whole). Everything perceivable implies a different partial of the same whole. It's other who suggest "counting" as to distract one from self with others, which when consented to, permits few to be accountants of many.
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 2 points 3 monthsJan 25, 2024 08:59:18 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 1 point 3 monthsJan 25, 2024 09:20:10 ago (+2/-1)
Much of what we shame blacks and jews for are in fact white behaviors.
We were indoctrinated with a psychology of weakness by the kikes and now we have the majority of the far right clinging to it, pretending it is "the morality of the white man", it's not, it's a Jewish creation that was imposes upon us.
When we hold them in contempt for violating the set of rules they had made up for us to destroy ourselves by following, we look like clowns.
The peope of europe and America did not become as great as they did by following the rules of "white virtues" they did it by taking the most effective approach to getting what they wanted, they cared for and aided their own ingroups while not being concerned for any outgroups.
You are so out of touch with your ancestors, yet you claim to exalt their glory. You try to incorporate Jewish ideals that are proven to be destructive to you into a platform of white strength. And you judge other groups by the standards of this retarded worldview that they had programmed you with (to handicap you).
Let's say that this is indeed nigger psychology, how's it working out for them?
Society bends over backwards for them, and I'm bit just talking about major institutions, I'm talking about the average individual.
There are only two types of tactics, the better kinds and the worse ones. It's retarded not to pick up the enemy's gun when it has been shown to be more effective than yours.
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 3 monthsJan 25, 2024 09:33:59 ago (+1/-0)
Literally not what we’re talking about. “Might makes right” and “oy vey goyim you can’t kill your enemies or use violence for anything” aren’t even remotely the same topic.
You’ll be killed right alongside them.
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] -1 points 3 monthsJan 25, 2024 10:02:29 ago (+0/-1)
The guy who think 2 + 2 = 4 is better at making weapons and organizing his men than the one who thinks that 2 + 2 = 5.
The scientific revolution took off precisely because it granted a superior capacity for might to those who accepted the scientific worldview.
You have a very limited and shortsighted view of what constitutes "might".
What I advocate for Is recognizing what works best for the purposes of what we seek to acheive, and adopting those tactics for our cause.
What the jews do, what the blacks do, some of it works for them, and it could work for us.
We need to become adaptive, we need to be smart.
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 3 monthsJan 25, 2024 10:06:19 ago (+1/-0)
Literally no. You’re attempting to steal my position and claim I hold yours. Does this work with anyone else anywhere else? I can’t imagine how.
How about we NOT compromise on our beliefs AND just start killing our enemies instead of letting them kill us? How is that difficult to understand?
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 3 monthsJan 25, 2024 10:14:37 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 0 points 3 monthsJan 25, 2024 15:37:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 3 monthsJan 25, 2024 16:26:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 0 points 3 monthsJan 25, 2024 16:51:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 3 monthsJan 26, 2024 20:49:45 ago (+0/-0)
But we've been talking about some happening, shtf, of Boogaloo going down for two decades.
That's all that this kind of bravado is, just idle talk with little to back it.
We got no organization, not even able to count on the commitment of our peers, we have no preparations, and we have no plan.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 3 monthsJan 25, 2024 13:02:19 ago (+0/-0)
Psyche (animating power) generates resistance; Logy (reasoning over affixed while ignoring animation) spends resistance. In other words...nature implies generator; those within re-generators aka action/reaction. Resisting each other makes one weak; while resisting temptations grows resistance.
Perceivable implies need to let go; suggested tempts want to hold onto...resisting want grows needed resistance.
Consenting to suggested the-ism implies ones submission to another; hence following suggested norms; rules of behaviors; manners of conduct; laws of men etc.
On the other hand...natural order (inception towards death) generates resistance (life).
Consenting to suggested positions it within oneself willingly, while one holds onto it. Ones free will of choice has to take it on; others cannot impose upon ones choice. It's a mercantile contract between buying (consent) and selling (suggestion).
Meanwhile; nature forces perceivable through each ones perception, which implies ones choice to adapt (need) or ignore (want) it for suggested.
Aka within (in) division (divi) two (dual)...being implies one (perception) within oneness (perceivable). It's ones consent (want or not want) to suggested; which divides ones against one another within conflicts of reason (want versus not want).
Individual implies reasoning against one another; being implies unit (Latin unitas; unus; one) within sound (entire; whole).
AV'ERAGE, noun - "in commerce, a contribution to a general loss"...others suggest averages to tempt one to ignore that loss (inception towards death) generates growth (life). Hence not a contribution of many; but an attribution of each one.
There can be (partial) only one (whole). Everything perceivable implies a different partial of the same whole. It's other who suggest "counting" as to distract one from self with others, which when consented to, permits few to be accountants of many.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 3 monthsJan 25, 2024 12:43:24 ago (+0/-0)
b) Psychology aka Psyche (animating power aka motion to momentum) and Logy (matter reasoning against each other, while ignoring momentum of motion).
For oneself...logy implies reasoning over suggested; psyche implies adapting to perceivable.