×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
30
9 comments block


[ - ] Zyklonbeekeeper 5 points 1.4 yearsJan 13, 2024 17:58:19 ago (+5/-0)

Well that about does it for me...settled science.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 3 points 1.4 yearsJan 13, 2024 17:32:58 ago (+3/-0)

Wells whips mys back an call me Toby.

We wuz kangs n shit

[ - ] Scyber 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 14, 2024 09:14:16 ago (+1/-0)

Gots to have dat grape drank. Das righ!

[ - ] xmasskull 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 13, 2024 18:00:53 ago (+2/-0)

100% BELIEVABLE!

damnfunny!!

[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 13, 2024 17:54:06 ago (+1/-0)

This actually looks like photoshop for once instead of AI. Nice

[ - ] H8Texpress 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 13, 2024 17:31:02 ago (+1/-0)

Shieeeeeeeeeeet

[ - ] Peleg 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 14, 2024 12:01:52 ago (+0/-0)

I beez da watamelown kang!

[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 13, 2024 21:31:07 ago (+0/-0)

I’ve had a miserable day and this gave me chukkkles! 🤣

[ - ] x0x7 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 13, 2024 18:39:20 ago (+0/-0)

Dey Waz. They never formed into large civilizations because of their social instability, so by the numbers they've probably had more kangs than us. But the logic escapes them that if there were kangz there were subjects also. And if they had more kangz in total that to be a kang is a common trait of their ancestors then they had more minor kangz. It really shows their incapacity for logic when they think they were descended from a race of exclusively kangz when there can be no such thing.