Sign into an existing account

My old housemate bitched me out one day for putting the wrong rubbish in the wrong bin. How the fuck he doesn't realise no one gives a shit until the local council wants to fuck you in the ass for something is beyond me...

If I was a cop and some dumb nigger tried to question my authority he'd be forced to swallow his own teeth.

Why not address the situation that would drive a man to that though? Nobody seems willing to address the core issues and instead just focus on preventing people from venting their frustration on the world.

America is not going to have a third revolution.
COVID is the roadmap for coercing compliance.
ideology becomes malleable when stability is threatened and fear takes hold.
To conquer the population, crash USD.
Allow violence and starvation to become norm.
Offer economic salvation, with conditions.
The overwhelming majority of non-combat aged 'patriots' will comply, just as they did before.
Beyond that, I'm not sure how your post is a reply to what I wrote.
Also, please understand that the constitution failed.
It did not safeguard.
It's checks did not balance.
The means to bypass it are now commonly known.
No matter the quality of it's crafting, or the nature of it's intent, it has proven wholly inadequate.
Freedom is insufficient to secure the long continuance of a society.
Literally every subversion can be justified by it.
Freedom must be formally countered by duty, to oneself, one's family, one's people and by extension one's state.
Not poetically, but very specifically - as in enumerated rights and responsibilities.
I wish it were not true, but it is.

Your argument, as in, the rhetorical content of the words you typed and not an argument such as a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others OR an exchange of diverging or opposite views.

In this discussion there is no benefit of doubt to give; I was paying attention at the time, I remember reading the news cycles - he was talking about red flag laws. The only reason to extend faith on the matter is that you're too young to have been socially aware, or are not well apprised of sociopolitcal events beyond the scope of the immediate.

I am indeed negative, it is a byproduct of being activist in these spaces for two decades to no effect but I am also highly formally educated on the topic and perfectly factual in my claims. This is not a debate, these are a series of truths not subject to the need for informal agreement.
The situation has already become, and is already well past out of hand, there is no preventing it from occurring ex post facto simply because people are only just beginning to realize the existent state of our former republic.

There is no need to freely exchange ideas about the nature of publicly available data, in examples such as this, there is only the presentation and later the verification stages of information internalization.
To this end I have made explicit claims which you are free to source independently of this interaction.
I'm not asking you to endorse a thing, I'm simply informing you.
What you do with it is precisely yours to determine, it is the one true freedom remaining to us all.

The only supposition I can identify in my above post is that I believed you to be a Trump supporter by your approach.
As that is not the case, allow me to correct myself and say that simply being a Trump supporter is enough to merit the consideration of mental defect or illness and while I'm not going to take the time to reactive my jstor account in order to search academic papers, these two articles should cast light on that particular claim.

Take care.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-shared-psychosis-of-donald-trump-and-his-loyalists/

"What attracts people to Trump? What is their animus or driving force?

The reasons are multiple and varied, but in my recent public-service book, Profile of a Nation, I have outlined two major emotional drives: narcissistic symbiosis and shared psychosis. Narcissistic symbiosis refers to the developmental wounds that make the leader-follower relationship magnetically attractive. The leader, hungry for adulation to compensate for an inner lack of self-worth, projects grandiose omnipotence—while the followers, rendered needy by societal stress or developmental injury, yearn for a parental figure. When such wounded individuals are given positions of power, they arouse similar pathology in the population that creates a “lock and key” relationship."

And another. more rhetorically direct example:
https://johnpavlovitz.com/2023/04/15/the-maga-mental-health-crisis/

"Men and women already prone to depression and anxiety, those normally driven to despair without any discernible cause or reason—now also have objective data that makes that hopelessness quite sensible.

The MAGA movement is making otherwise mentally healthy people emotionally sick, and making ill people much worse. Like forcing a person suffering from Asthma into an enclosed space and making them exert themselves over and over without rest; surrounding them with every allergen and trigger their illness has—and with great joy, watching them gradually suffocate.

And a growing number of otherwise well people are developing a form of PTSD from continual exposure to a group of people in power whose malevolence and contempt for life are beyond comprehension. They too are finding the space within their own heads to be a dangerous one as they live within it all.

What worse, the GOP’s boundless assaults on human rights, their vicious crusades against science, their continual gaslighting of otherwise sensible people, and their reckless fake news conspiracy theories, aren’t just making those who oppose them prone to head sickness—they’re doing the same to his supporters."