×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
5

I don't understand why Nicholas II let his family die

submitted by Conspirologist to TellUpgoat 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 08:02:40 ago (+11/-6)     (TellUpgoat)

The Russian secret police was one of the best in the world. I can't believe they didn't know the 1917 revolution was organized by Jews. It seems like Nicholas II was clueless till the end about the danger they represent. This all doesn't make sense. My theory is that the elite are all controlled by Judeo-Satanists and blindly obey what the Jews say.


22 comments block


[ - ] Razzoriel 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 18:55:08 ago (+0/-0)

Tsar Nicholas II was the first monarch in a long time who married a noblewoman out of love, and not politics. He had extensive military knowledge and was fairly humble compared to the predecessors. He was loved and admired by the common Russian as one of the most noble tsars of their time. But he was ill-advised, and had to navigate one of, if not the most degenerate court of all Europe, by then the jewiest nobility of all.

To name a few of his mistakes, he made several jew settlements in Ukraine expecting them to grow grains in the breadbasket of Europe; they sold all the tools and ran moonshine runs with banking business by selling the tools and having help from other jews in other countries.

He then got the richest of them to teach in universities, which became hotbeds for marxist ideologies. And worst of all, he believed both sides of all arguments should be heard, despite being naturally inclined to support the White party, pro-monarchy (after the coup, some of the White party members fled to, you guessed it right, Bielorussia).

[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 13:21:22 ago (+1/-0)

The royals become like celebrities and politicians who live in an insular world controlled by advisors and strategists, usually jews who inveigled their way in if you look hard enough.

The Tsar, the German Kaiser and the British King were all related, and the King and Kaiser refused to take them in. Sort of "you made your bed, now lie in it with the people you failed." It was "If you run away, our people will no longer trust us".

Here's letters between the three during World War One and the weather is more interesting to them than the war.

https://www.history.co.uk/articles/the-kaiser-the-tsar-and-king-george-v-cousins-at-war-in-ww1

The international bankers all jews had them all by the balls in debt like they do today and insisted on that war. They had every intention of using the chaos of war to get their activist communists the advantage.

The US Nye Committee congressional committee in 1935 investigated the banker's war and found that the jews made a profit of $10,000 per dead soldier. They just called the jews "Americans", and that's always been an error.

[ - ] Dingo 5 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 13:07:05 ago (+5/-0)

Look for a book called "200 Years Together". A terse book, but explains everything perfectly if you are able to contain it all and put it together. Here is an audiobook + analysis on the matter (you can listen to it while doing squats at the gym):

https://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=564752

[ - ] Fascinus 5 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 13:55:41 ago (+5/-0)

Thanks for the link, bro!

I've wanted to read this ever since I finished the Gulag Archipelago years ago. If it's anything like his other work, the audio version will make the undertaking a bit less daunting.

[ - ] Dingo 4 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 14:15:13 ago (+4/-0)

My pleasure! If you want to go on a massive DL spree, check out his main trove:

https://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=551812

Anything read by Alex Linder has a "white nationalist" slant on it. His analysis of the E Micheal Jones books are very good and thorough.

[ - ] NoRefunds 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 19:18:15 ago (+2/-0)

[ - ] foxtrot45 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 14:56:06 ago (+2/-0)

Another audiobook that I believe has a chapter covering this is called The Curse of Canaan by Eustace Mullins. It is a audiobook version on youtube or bitchute. It is packed with info, including at the end where it will tell you what modern days white mans biggest weakness is. I think about it everyday for the last 5 years.

[ - ] Sector2 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 15:03:17 ago (+1/-0)

Being so tamed that a society ruled by government is tolerable?

[ - ] foxtrot45 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 17:04:19 ago (+1/-0)

no, not close

[ - ] Dingo 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 15:57:49 ago (+0/-0)

Check out the other link I gave, that book is also there and read by Alex Linder. Curse of Canaan is also definitely recommend.

[ - ] Conspirologist [op] -1 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 13:09:41 ago (+1/-2)

Sorry, I need a succinct analysis. I have no time for all this.

[ - ] Dingo 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 14:19:34 ago (+2/-0)

No worries, mate. I can give you a "bubble gum" level summary here.

Basically, yids are an international mafia. The Czar didn't see the American military and banking cartels being so powerful and connected in his own nation. i.e. he underestemated pure evil.

His and his family's death was a ritual/kabbalistic sacrifice.

[ - ] Fascinus 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 15:38:40 ago (+2/-0)

So many streets to shit in. So little time...

[ - ] MeowtherFluffer 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 12:55:34 ago (+2/-0)

Ra ra rasputin…

[ - ] ArnoBreker 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 09:14:45 ago (+0/-0)

Prior to the Bolshevik Revolution, Czar Nicholas was hated by the Russian people for his terrible governing ability, there was scandal after scandal with that family. I watched a two-hour long video on it once, but I have since forgotten where I watched it. I'm not justifying Communist revolution, but Czar Nicholas was a terrible monarch from everything I've read.

[ - ] Razzoriel 6 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 10:34:56 ago (+6/-0)

He was the most popular Tsar by a far margin. Go see how many people watched his coronation. No single king has little public support but masses the biggest coronation in the country's history. The people saying he was unpopular cite scandals the common Russian peasant had no interest in, because on his rule there was a fraction of the common famine plaguing the countryside.

His mistake was thinking the other side could be reasoned with, and being convinced as such.

[ - ] Dingo 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 13:08:49 ago (+1/-0)

His mistake was thinking the other side could be reasoned with, and being convinced as such.

^ This. It's clear he didn't understand the monster at his doorstep. Plus, the americans being involved was not on his purview.

[ - ] deleted 4 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 09:32:01 ago (+4/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Conspirologist [op] -3 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 09:41:11 ago (+1/-4)

That's right. I don't think he was high IQ. Looks like he let the Jews do everything they wanted.

[ - ] ModernGuilt 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 09:02:06 ago (+2/-1)

This was always an interesting topic for me: boomers know absolutely 0 about the Romanovs outside of that faggot boomer band rolling stones song referencing Anastasia. Like literally nothing.

jews, they STILL seethe over the czar. It's incredible

[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 4 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 09:09:20 ago (+6/-2)

Nichols II denied the Jews to make the National bank private. This is why the Jews made the revolution. Jews can't control the country without the private National bank.

[ - ] Razzoriel 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 8, 2024 18:50:20 ago (+0/-0)

He also let universities be jew centrals. Take a guess where the bolsheviks hid all their stashes of weapons and ammunition.