Sign into an existing account

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] -2 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 18:37:27 ago (+0/-2)

Just an insult. Not an argument.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 01:08:42 ago (+0/-0)

Because arguing with retarded bullshit is a waste of time.

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 03:05:06 ago (+0/-1)

Yet you have commented two times already.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 03:29:14 ago (+0/-0)

Pointing out obvious bullshit doesn't take much time. I put in only the amount of effort it deserves.

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 03:30:30 ago (+0/-1)

Aaaand three comments. Okay, since we are already so far, care to elaborate why you think nukes aren't fake and gay?

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 03:42:20 ago (+0/-0)

Because chemical weapons don't make explosions that big. You can go visit the Trinity site, bring a Geiger counter, and see the trinitite for yourself.

Do nuclear power plants exist?

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 22, 2024 14:02:56 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 05:40:19 ago (+0/-1)

See, that's what i'm talking about. Radiation is not kaboom, nigger. I was not talking about radiation not existing, but i guess, that's like two things tied together forever for you.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 05:44:42 ago (+0/-0)

You don't respond to what I said. Chemical explosions don't get that big. The extra radiation and trinitite exists because of radiation. Nuclear power plants operate on the same principle, except they aren't designed to explode in a runaway chain reaction.

You are a retard. Go play in traffic.

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 08:51:08 ago (+0/-0)

Hey, could you please direct to such camera, which can withstand nuclear detonation? 0:28.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMopb1eN2t4

Continue thread

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 08:57:44 ago (+0/-0)

Also, could you please explain why firebombing effect is so similar to structures as nuke kaboom?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVFSJ9ZrGe8 1:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x5i6PWenss 0:13

Continue thread

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 09:09:11 ago (+0/-0)

Also, how come when dealing with nukes the probability for accidents is 0,0000%? In whole history everything has been accidentally blown up multiple times, but nukes? No, nada, niente. Even Pakistanis and Indians have 0,0000% chance of any accident happen. Shitskins, who forget to close the hatch to a submarine so it sinks.

[ - ] SumerBreeze 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 16:45:16 ago (+3/-2)

Just remember that you are dumber than a pajeet. A fuckin street shitter has more smarts than you!

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] -3 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 16:57:44 ago (+0/-3)

Not an argument.

[ + ] SumerBreeze

[ - ] SumerBreeze 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 23:34:51 ago (+2/-0)

No point arguing with retards LOL

[ - ] Lordbananafist 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 15:40:00 ago (+2/-1)

sooo...

if everybody stops talking about them.. the only people left making noise about them will be folks who have a vested interest in scaring everybody?

so that will make it easier to identify jerks.

[ - ] Dingo 0 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 20:32:50 ago (+0/-0)

Interesting ratio going on here. Welcome to the deplorables.

[ - ] Master_Foo -4 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 16:43:29 ago (+0/-4)

I bet you think Jesus Christ is real.

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] -2 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 16:57:57 ago (+0/-2)

Also not an argument.

[ - ] Master_Foo -2 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 17:17:30 ago (+0/-2)

No, it's called "pattern matching".
My heuristics are correct, right?

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] -2 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 18:37:00 ago (+0/-2)

No. I can tell my interpretation of JC story tho, if you are interested.

[ - ] Master_Foo -2 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 18:46:57 ago (+0/-2)

Now you're lying.
Because if you didn't worship a Jew, you would have just said so from the beginning instead of deflecting.

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel 2 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 20:00:55 ago (+2/-0)

Fallacious argument. Do better, sweaty.

[ + ] Dingo

[ - ] Dingo 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 20:19:08 ago (+1/-0)

Holy shit, I thought for a second you wrote fellacious argument ... and how come you refer to the poster as "sweaty"?

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel 1 point 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 20:31:57 ago (+1/-0)

sweet summer child...

[ - ] Master_Foo -2 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 20:20:38 ago (+0/-2)

Maybe the argument is fallacious.
It's irrelevant if the heuristic is reliably accurate.

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] -2 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 18:48:08 ago (+0/-2)

So how's the weather there? It's -20 Celsius here.

[ - ] Master_Foo -2 points 1.3 yearsJan 4, 2024 19:48:02 ago (+0/-2)

Deflecting.

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 02:57:27 ago (+0/-1)

Can you have a normal conversation?

[ - ] Master_Foo -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 03:01:32 ago (+0/-1)

Normal conversations involve you not deflecting.

[ - ] albatrosv15 [op] -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 03:01:13 ago (+0/-1)

Also, why did you ask "My heuristics are correct, right?", when you already knew the answer?

[ - ] Master_Foo -1 points 1.3 yearsJan 5, 2024 03:06:05 ago (+0/-1)

I know my heuristics are correct.
I'm the official Voat noticer.
My Heuristics are 10 years ahead of everyone else's.
That's why my predictions are so accurate.

Long story short, humans are predictable and you executed the standard NPC thought diagram.
I know more about you than you know about yourself.

Prove me correct. deflect the conversation again. The diagram says you will.