It’s what the Bible teaches. All bibles teach it. The love and joy of 72 virgins is no different than the heaven promise in all religions, everywhere! Is there a religion I can believe, Christianity, Buddhist, Muslim (but not the Jews, they are evil.) one thing is true: just love one another, be kind. But watch out for Jews, they are the naughty people.
[ - ] Portmanure [op] 1 point 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:48:26 ago (+1/-0)
I understand, you lost someone, I can help, for just a few shekels I can guarantee your loved one who definitely is going to heaven will go to heaven on a lovely sheet of velvet. Why wouldn’t you want them to be comfortable on there journey to the beyond?
See, there is my biggest issue with reincarnation, I hear people sprout this all the time, what do you remember from your previous life, what did you learn?. Exactly my point, no one remembers, there's no point to such a comment.pie in the sky, like the rest of it.
Being (living) can only exist within procession (dying). Being moved from inception towards death implies living (temporary growth) within procession of dying (ongoing loss).
Others suggest the-ism to distract one from discerning self by submitting to another. THE (definite adjective) implies an affixed quality, which cannot exist within a moving system, yet holding onto an affixed quality (suggested information) tempts one to ignore being within a motion (perceivable inspiration).
I didn't exist before I was born and that turned out ok.
Before implies "forward being" aka being (life) moved forwards (inception towards death) within motion. Therefore...motion exists before one comes to be within.
If being implies solid (temporary) within fluid (ongoing), then fluid to solid (inception); solid within fluid (life) and solid to fluid (death) implies transmutation of ingredients (matter) within base (motion) aka alchemy. If motion transmutes into matter, then momentum of motion implies cauldron; kettle; cooking pot. Notice increase of heat when transmuting inception towards life, and decrease of heat when transmuting life towards death...
What if others suggest pluralism (we) to distract singular (one) from discerning self within UNI (Latin unitas; unus; one)? What if only there can only be ones (partials) within oneness (whole)?
What if suggested dualism (two) tempts one to ignore self? Can you show me TWO things that do not exist apart from ONE another?
a) Only within procession of dying (ongoing loss) can living (temporary growth) come to be.
b) Only within ongoing can temporary (life) exist in-between beginning (inception) and end (death).
c) Motion to momentum to matter...that's how beginning and end of matter can exist for life within, without a beginning and end of motion.
what if...is not?
Ones consent to suggested nihilism (not) tempts one to deny (is not) perceivable (if/then). Implication (if/then) is based on motion; while reasoning (is vs isn't) is based on ignoring motion.
Ask yourself: if not is; then...? Can you describe the who; where; what and why of "no; not; nothing; nothingness"?
one thing is true...be kind
Kind implies "sort; particular nature", hence each one being apart from one another. Suggested truism (truth) tempts one to hold onto a suggested axiom; maxim, when consenting to it, which in return tempts one into a conflict of reason (truth vs false) against one another.
A so called jew aka a chosen one implies you (jew), the one choosing (chosen one) the suggestions of another. Those who fall for this trick are blaming others for their choices, while ignoring their own consent to suggested choices by others.
- Nature does not suggest anything...it moves perceivable (whole) towards each ones perception (partials). - Nature does not reason (true vs false)...it implies (if/then). - Suggestion contradicts perception and reason contradicts implication.
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 3 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:45:01 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Portmanure
[ - ] Portmanure [op] 1 point 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:48:26 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel 1 point 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 03:31:47 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Niggly_Puff
[ - ] Niggly_Puff 1 point 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:31:44 ago (+1/-0)
I didnt exist before I was born and that turned out ok.
[ + ] Portmanure
[ - ] Portmanure [op] 2 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:34:37 ago (+3/-1)
You did and you chose this existence to learn something.
You haven’t learned it.
[ + ] Cunty
[ - ] Cunty 2 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 03:12:49 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Niggly_Puff
[ - ] Niggly_Puff 0 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:47:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Portmanure
[ - ] Portmanure [op] 2 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:50:44 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 06:28:33 ago (+0/-0)
Being (living) can only exist within procession (dying). Being moved from inception towards death implies living (temporary growth) within procession of dying (ongoing loss).
Others suggest the-ism to distract one from discerning self by submitting to another. THE (definite adjective) implies an affixed quality, which cannot exist within a moving system, yet holding onto an affixed quality (suggested information) tempts one to ignore being within a motion (perceivable inspiration).
Before implies "forward being" aka being (life) moved forwards (inception towards death) within motion. Therefore...motion exists before one comes to be within.
If being implies solid (temporary) within fluid (ongoing), then fluid to solid (inception); solid within fluid (life) and solid to fluid (death) implies transmutation of ingredients (matter) within base (motion) aka alchemy. If motion transmutes into matter, then momentum of motion implies cauldron; kettle; cooking pot. Notice increase of heat when transmuting inception towards life, and decrease of heat when transmuting life towards death...
[ + ] Cantaloupe
[ - ] Cantaloupe 1 point 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:16:52 ago (+1/-0)
Just live your life morally and enjoy it.
Assume there is, if you're wrong it won't trouble you
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 06:12:42 ago (+0/-0)
What if others suggest pluralism (we) to distract singular (one) from discerning self within UNI (Latin unitas; unus; one)? What if only there can only be ones (partials) within oneness (whole)?
What if suggested dualism (two) tempts one to ignore self? Can you show me TWO things that do not exist apart from ONE another?
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:04:13 ago (+1/-0)
They are all (((Abrahamaic))) based faiths.
Don't waste your finite time here on Earth on a jewish promise of grand gifts.
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 3 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:11:04 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug -1 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:17:27 ago (+0/-1)
There I fixed it you facetious cunt
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 2 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 02:20:23 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 07:26:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 4 monthsDec 29, 2023 06:08:33 ago (+0/-0)
b) Only within ongoing can temporary (life) exist in-between beginning (inception) and end (death).
c) Motion to momentum to matter...that's how beginning and end of matter can exist for life within, without a beginning and end of motion.
Ones consent to suggested nihilism (not) tempts one to deny (is not) perceivable (if/then). Implication (if/then) is based on motion; while reasoning (is vs isn't) is based on ignoring motion.
Ask yourself: if not is; then...? Can you describe the who; where; what and why of "no; not; nothing; nothingness"?
Kind implies "sort; particular nature", hence each one being apart from one another. Suggested truism (truth) tempts one to hold onto a suggested axiom; maxim, when consenting to it, which in return tempts one into a conflict of reason (truth vs false) against one another.
A so called jew aka a chosen one implies you (jew), the one choosing (chosen one) the suggestions of another. Those who fall for this trick are blaming others for their choices, while ignoring their own consent to suggested choices by others.
- Nature does not suggest anything...it moves perceivable (whole) towards each ones perception (partials).
- Nature does not reason (true vs false)...it implies (if/then).
- Suggestion contradicts perception and reason contradicts implication.