×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
10
12 comments block


[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 12 points 10 monthsDec 22, 2023 00:03:36 ago (+12/-0)

I so hate that millennial faggot for this. No one on earth has had more people see their dick than him and yet he kvetches about it nonstop. This dude had his little tater-tot on the cover of one of the biggest band's biggest albums and he’s bitching. I bet he’s gotten more pussy because of this. What an ingrate.

[ - ] GrayDragon 8 points 10 monthsDec 22, 2023 00:58:19 ago (+8/-0)

He's just looking for a payout. The modern American way.

E: And also, why aren't the jews that produced the album and the jews that published the album not on the hook?

[ - ] GreenSaint 1 point 10 monthsDec 22, 2023 06:38:25 ago (+1/-0)

I remember when I was a kid some guy told me that’s the new American dream. Winning a huge lawsuit

[ - ] Scyber 0 points 10 monthsDec 22, 2023 09:52:14 ago (+0/-0)

Well to be fair, he is swimming towards a dollar bill on a fishing hook on the album cover.

[ - ] paul_neri [op] 2 points 10 monthsDec 22, 2023 00:05:36 ago (+2/-0)

Agree.

[ - ] yesiknow 3 points 10 monthsDec 22, 2023 00:47:50 ago (+3/-0)

That's so they can tear down statues that have cherubs on them as part of the jews aws against "idolatry".

Jews believe they're the idols. God wants jews torn down.

[ - ] Niggly_Puff 1 point 10 monthsDec 22, 2023 01:05:07 ago (+1/-0)

Everyone wants to be a victim.

[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 10 monthsDec 24, 2023 13:51:45 ago (+0/-0)

he just wants money

[ - ] deleted 1 point 10 monthsDec 22, 2023 03:07:45 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] paul_neri [op] 0 points 10 monthsDec 22, 2023 03:08:47 ago (+0/-0)

What! And be sued for twice as much!

[ - ] Crackinjokes 3 points 10 monthsDec 22, 2023 09:01:48 ago (+3/-0)

I have to say that like so many other things in society that people thought about things like this in the 90s and a very different way. No one would even have thought that anything like that was sexual. It would have been funny and cute. Oh that's a cute little baby. It's like parents used to take pictures of their naked kids in the bathtub and they show them and nobody thought of it as sexual and now those parents would be arrested. So I have to say that in this particular case I think Nirvana I don't know what their deep intentions were but in this particular case judging based on the society norms at the time it was a very innocent thing and not bad in any way. And it's actually the leftist perverted the whole world and now it makes this cover look bad. I mean seriously whole generation of parents would be arrested today for taking pictures of their little babies and kids in their bathtubs. And they used to do it all the time and nobody thought it was sexual at all because we didn't know that there were a bunch of pedophile pervert f**** homo f* out there who actually thinking of things like that is sexual and so we didn't know that we needed to defend against those f** f***.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 1 point 10 monthsDec 23, 2023 01:12:55 ago (+1/-0)

There's nothing sexual about that album cover. It's so jewy to think that nudity is necessarily sexual. It's a failure to understand both sex and nudity. Judge ought to ask plaintiff what exactly is the sexual exploitation involved here, and when he mutters something about baby dicks, judge can have him arrested for being a pedophile and sexualualizing an infant. Pedophilia is still illegal, right?