Origin and tracing the history of this fallacy: This fallacy is practiced daily in present day American society, and perhaps other places, however I have experienced it incessantly in the past decade, and can't verify other locations of its happening. The fallacy is commonly practiced by atheists, secular jews and secular Christians who are under the influence of Jewish propaganda in America.
Definition: The omnipotence fallacy can be seen when a person in a debate or conversation dismisses something because it (a function) doesn't work in the opposite way of its own function.
Examples: When talking to someone about how Israel receives 100s of billions of dollars you can argue that there are things in America that could be fixed or upgraded with that money instead of sending it there, and if enough infrastructure in America is allowed to degrade, we won't be able to make the money to send over there, and this is an example of parasitic behavior by jews that kills their host.
The other side of this conversation will say something like "They're getting the money but that doesn't make any sense, if they were killing their host nation they wouldn't be able to get the money", and while they agree with the original premise their unstated assumption is that there is an unlimited energy source in America or the parasite has a godly ability to draw unlimitedly without invoking any cause and effect or chain of events that disrupts this process, which quickly snowballs into a number of other obvious logical fallacies that cannot function IRL. The they then dismiss the topic as if there is an omnipotent property of the parasite at work. This sort of fallacy is usually followed by a contrived sense of decisiveness and smugness that they've got the topic at hand figured out and in-hand, and the wielder of the fallacy checks out of the conversation.
More examples to come. Feel free to critique this fallacy so I can improve it or clarify aspects of it.
There doesn't seem to be anything here yet