Sign into an existing account

Zero divided zero is zero.

Take zero slices of zero pizzas.
How many pizzas do you have?

Hmm, I’m going to take this nothing and split it into nothing and…

Woah I got an egg! I really was expecting a chicken, but I guess we can’t really complain about your incredibly genius logic!

No.

Trope divided by Trope is 1.

The logic is sound.

🤣

Nothing from nothing leaves nothing

Zero divided by zero is not zero. It is undefined.

Zero divides zero as many times as you choose. No choice is wrong, but nor is some choice the only choice.

This is because the result is x which solves:

0x = 0

That is derived easily from supposing a solution exists and setting x = 0/0.

As you can see, any choice of x yields 0 = 0, thus any x is a solution.

0 going into 0, exactly 1 time... is not only obvious, but also irrelevant
Think about what it really says... almost nothing
There is still no 1, 1 is the value attributed to the division of nothing.
The zeros did not produce a 1, the concept did.
There is no revelation here.

math equations are just representations of plain english, simplified.

Like "a train heading east going 30 mph, and another train 90 miles away, blah, blah ,blah" you can turn that scenario into a formula to solve for some word problem.

However any time you introduce dividng zero into the conversation you have to explain it further because it now suddenly matters if youre asking (a) what remains, (b) what gets taken away, or if youre asking (c) the number of times a thing cycles.

With any other number, it doesnt matter because the formula is the same. you will always, for one example, use 6/2 = 3 if trying to find out any of the former three (a) what remains, (b) what is taken away, or (c) how many cycles.

in your version of a word problem, you are defining how to use zero [(c) how many cycles], so it actually works. In your case, you can divide zero by zero and get 1.

Just note, there are 2 other ways to Divide Zero. (One results in 0, another results in infinity.) But the reason you "cant" officially divide by zero is not really because you cant. You can.
But its because the formula doesnt quite have enough information by itself. 0/0, by itself, has to be further explained, like you have done.

Meanwhile, 6/2=3 can be used universally to figure any version of a word problem that encounters 6 and 2 actors. Its the zero actor that is tricky and begs for more info.

Nothing times one hundred is still nothing, sure; but one hundred times nothing should still be one hundred, not nothing. Math is fake&gay.

You can times this zero by one hundred