this is america. every time i'm saying something I can see the faggot or faggots i'm talking to getting ready to blurt out something and they always ignore whatever i'm saying.
this one fucking guy i was talking to over the phone today took a straight 5 minutes to understand what I was saying because he kept fucking ignoring what i kept repeating over and over again and the conversation finally ended with me repeating the first sentence I said after having whittled away (slowly) at the dumb thoughts he was having that were preventing him from understanding what I was saying.
That is because the person making "understand" previously listened with the "intent to reply" and successfully got the conch to prattle on currently. It's a vicious back-and-forth cycle. -- Sage Guru GrayDragon
a) Understanding aka "standing-under" implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, hence ones submission to another. To reply implies to either perceivable (reality) or suggested (fiction)...depending on ones free will of choice. Others suggest understanding as the inversion of growing discernment as self and comprehension about surrounding within perceivable.
b) Perceivable (action) implies origin for ones perception (reaction). All intent tempts one to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcome.
c) Suggested "tendencies" aka TEND (to move in a certain direction) tempts one to ignore being (life) directed (inception towards death); hence resistance within velocity. If life follows from inception towards death; then life dies. Others suggest progressivism to tempt one to follow leaders towards suggested outcomes, which tempts one to ignore the only outcome of life...death.
d) As for Stephen Corvey...if others consent to ones suggested fiction; then those others permit one to flourish within perceivable reality, while diminishing themselves. Like planting the seed for nine children and fifty-five grandchildren while suggesting others the "Spiritual Roots of Human Relations"...
My take on the world understand, or stand-under. To submit to "what is". This doesn't have to be "another" as much as "reality itself".
a) Being within (life) what is (inception towards death) implies as temporary growth within ongoing loss, hence the need to resist wanted temptation. If life submits to being moved towards death, then life dies faster, hence "path of least resistance".
b) suggested "submit" aka sub (under) + mitto (send) tempts one to ignore discerning self as being center (life) send by circumference (inception towards death). Submission to suggestions by another; destabilizes ones center and thereby cut one off circumference.
Destabilizing self willingly permits chosen ones to erect self at center, while cutting off anyone else in their circumference aka "circumcision". For example..central banking cutting off everyone's trust.
acceptance (or agreement) of reality
Hold your breath and wait until nature forces you to adapt. While you wait...consider if your acceptance vs refusal aka agreement vs disagreement aka want vs not want, changes the need to adapt (life) to force (inception towards death)?
From a different perspective: choice can only exist in-between balance (need/want)...others tempt choice to imbalance (want vs not want) self by choosing to hold onto a side.
two parties
a) Part implies partial (one) within whole (oneness). Only within whole can there partials. If whole moves; then momentum of motion divides whole (inception towards death) into partials (life).
b) take "two" of anything and permit yourself to notice that each ONE exists within a different position for you to be able to discern in-between. Others suggest dualism (dual, two) to distract the consenting one from self with others. Two isn't a natural state, but each one needs to discern self first, before being able to comprehend this. Agreeing (forming a bond aka holding onto) with this suggestion by another prevents one from self discernment.
From a different angle...NUM'BER, noun (nombre; name) - "designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun (Latin unus, unitas, unity) - "one". Nature doesn't suggest names or numbers; it designates units by dividing whole (oneness) into partials (ones).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."all for one and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone"...ALL(in)ONE.
Great reply here. I appreciate your detail with words.
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 7 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 00:30:20 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] MuricaPersonified
[ - ] MuricaPersonified 3 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 05:17:27 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 4 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 06:41:11 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] iThinkiShitYourself
[ - ] iThinkiShitYourself 1 point 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 18:48:23 ago (+1/-0)
this one fucking guy i was talking to over the phone today took a straight 5 minutes to understand what I was saying because he kept fucking ignoring what i kept repeating over and over again and the conversation finally ended with me repeating the first sentence I said after having whittled away (slowly) at the dumb thoughts he was having that were preventing him from understanding what I was saying.
[ + ] GrayDragon
[ - ] GrayDragon 2 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 03:04:35 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 1 point 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 15:44:35 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 2 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 00:47:26 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] GrayDragon
[ - ] GrayDragon 4 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 03:07:34 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 3 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 03:27:52 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 08:55:23 ago (+0/-0)*
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 05:43:18 ago (+1/-1)
b) Perceivable (action) implies origin for ones perception (reaction). All intent tempts one to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcome.
c) Suggested "tendencies" aka TEND (to move in a certain direction) tempts one to ignore being (life) directed (inception towards death); hence resistance within velocity. If life follows from inception towards death; then life dies. Others suggest progressivism to tempt one to follow leaders towards suggested outcomes, which tempts one to ignore the only outcome of life...death.
d) As for Stephen Corvey...if others consent to ones suggested fiction; then those others permit one to flourish within perceivable reality, while diminishing themselves. Like planting the seed for nine children and fifty-five grandchildren while suggesting others the "Spiritual Roots of Human Relations"...
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 09:03:20 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 09:34:12 ago (+0/-1)
a) Being within (life) what is (inception towards death) implies as temporary growth within ongoing loss, hence the need to resist wanted temptation. If life submits to being moved towards death, then life dies faster, hence "path of least resistance".
b) suggested "submit" aka sub (under) + mitto (send) tempts one to ignore discerning self as being center (life) send by circumference (inception towards death). Submission to suggestions by another; destabilizes ones center and thereby cut one off circumference.
Destabilizing self willingly permits chosen ones to erect self at center, while cutting off anyone else in their circumference aka "circumcision". For example..central banking cutting off everyone's trust.
Hold your breath and wait until nature forces you to adapt. While you wait...consider if your acceptance vs refusal aka agreement vs disagreement aka want vs not want, changes the need to adapt (life) to force (inception towards death)?
From a different perspective: choice can only exist in-between balance (need/want)...others tempt choice to imbalance (want vs not want) self by choosing to hold onto a side.
a) Part implies partial (one) within whole (oneness). Only within whole can there partials. If whole moves; then momentum of motion divides whole (inception towards death) into partials (life).
b) take "two" of anything and permit yourself to notice that each ONE exists within a different position for you to be able to discern in-between. Others suggest dualism (dual, two) to distract the consenting one from self with others. Two isn't a natural state, but each one needs to discern self first, before being able to comprehend this. Agreeing (forming a bond aka holding onto) with this suggestion by another prevents one from self discernment.
From a different angle...NUM'BER, noun (nombre; name) - "designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun (Latin unus, unitas, unity) - "one". Nature doesn't suggest names or numbers; it designates units by dividing whole (oneness) into partials (ones).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."all for one and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone"...ALL(in)ONE.
Thanks for inspiring replies.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 0 points 5 monthsNov 29, 2023 04:33:56 ago (+0/-0)
Eat and excericise for high-T, boys.