First, God had to pick somebody as the father of the Messiah. Should this be someone that is of great character and deeds? Someone like Job - a contemporary of Abram, and both of these men were alive while Noah was still alive. It would be interesting to learn how much contact Noah had with his descendants at that point.
Should someone like Job be the chosen father for the Messiah, what message does that send to all of us sinners? That we need to be good to earn the favor of God?
Or, should God choose the most detestable family group ever, and show all of us common sinners that no matter how much we rebel against God, His promises are still kept and we can be saved?
The first Bible read through makes it seem like a nice story of how God is faithful to His promises (which is true), but readings after that - focusing on different things - show a pattern of horrendous jew behavior that sticks out immediately.
The jews are evil little goblins that need to be punished, but the messages gleaned by their actions can give hope to the rest of us sinners too.
a) invention aka IN (within) VENIO (to come) TION (action) implies reaction coming to be within action.
Only within action (balance) can there be reactions (choice).
b) there's no choice above one, unless one chooses to submit to the suggested choice of another. A "chosen one" was chosen by "one's choice".
Furthermore; free will of choice implies singular...not plural. There's no such thing as collective choice, only each singular choice, choosing to consent to a pluralism aka collectivism, suggested by another singular choice.
In short...nature generates each ONE within...other ones within nature suggest WE to distract one from self.
Your consent to suggested theism (god) and pluralism (jews; them) permits another to be a "chosen one", while positioning you under the authority of theism and into the collective of pluralism. You believe to be under the authority of (god) and part of a collective (us) fighting against another collective (them)...that represents a controlled mental environment you were lured into, and only yourself can choose to resist the temptation of wanting to hold onto it.
Consenting (want or not want) to a suggestion tempts one into a conflict of reason (want versus not want). No matter which side one chooses; one remains within the same conflict, hence being tricked into circular logic/reasoning.
deception
Choosing to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) implies self-deception, while permitting others to mislead with suggested.
presuming
Consenting to suggested (information) implies PRESU'ME, verb - "to take upon self". Meanwhile...perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto.
Wanting to hold onto suggested (words) while ignoring the need to let go of perceivable (sound) implies presumption.
incapable...
...implies being IN (within) CAPABLE (hollow) aka solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death). Being implies enabled (partial) within able (whole).
Others exploit ones lack of self discernment by suggesting one to be incapable of something; when in reality...one wields the free will of choice within everything offered. Consenting to suggested "incapable" puts a restriction upon self-expression.
Sleight of hand from Madonna: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature"
Jupiter Optimus Maximus crushed them and their puny god. Then they awakened the serpent god of chaos who slithered unseen in the rushes, bit and poisoned Jupiter, who fell down. Now his people must repair his bite with their own saliva, not with the shedded skin of the snake, and then he will rise up again. Then he will crush the serpent under his heel and pursue the perpetrators.
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 3 points 1.5 yearsNov 22, 2023 02:11:03 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 8664920 1 point 1.5 yearsNov 22, 2023 12:12:43 ago (+1/-0)
First, God had to pick somebody as the father of the Messiah. Should this be someone that is of great character and deeds? Someone like Job - a contemporary of Abram, and both of these men were alive while Noah was still alive. It would be interesting to learn how much contact Noah had with his descendants at that point.
Should someone like Job be the chosen father for the Messiah, what message does that send to all of us sinners? That we need to be good to earn the favor of God?
Or, should God choose the most detestable family group ever, and show all of us common sinners that no matter how much we rebel against God, His promises are still kept and we can be saved?
The first Bible read through makes it seem like a nice story of how God is faithful to His promises (which is true), but readings after that - focusing on different things - show a pattern of horrendous jew behavior that sticks out immediately.
The jews are evil little goblins that need to be punished, but the messages gleaned by their actions can give hope to the rest of us sinners too.
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 2265088 1 point 1.5 yearsNov 22, 2023 04:33:14 ago (+1/-0)
Only within action (balance) can there be reactions (choice).
b) there's no choice above one, unless one chooses to submit to the suggested choice of another. A "chosen one" was chosen by "one's choice".
Furthermore; free will of choice implies singular...not plural. There's no such thing as collective choice, only each singular choice, choosing to consent to a pluralism aka collectivism, suggested by another singular choice.
In short...nature generates each ONE within...other ones within nature suggest WE to distract one from self.
Your consent to suggested theism (god) and pluralism (jews; them) permits another to be a "chosen one", while positioning you under the authority of theism and into the collective of pluralism. You believe to be under the authority of (god) and part of a collective (us) fighting against another collective (them)...that represents a controlled mental environment you were lured into, and only yourself can choose to resist the temptation of wanting to hold onto it.
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 1 point 1.5 yearsNov 22, 2023 03:11:05 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PrincessRobotBubblegum
[ - ] PrincessRobotBubblegum 1 point 1.5 yearsNov 22, 2023 02:52:40 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 2265088 0 points 1.5 yearsNov 22, 2023 04:48:21 ago (+0/-0)
Consenting (want or not want) to a suggestion tempts one into a conflict of reason (want versus not want). No matter which side one chooses; one remains within the same conflict, hence being tricked into circular logic/reasoning.
Choosing to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) implies self-deception, while permitting others to mislead with suggested.
Consenting to suggested (information) implies PRESU'ME, verb - "to take upon self". Meanwhile...perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto.
Wanting to hold onto suggested (words) while ignoring the need to let go of perceivable (sound) implies presumption.
...implies being IN (within) CAPABLE (hollow) aka solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death). Being implies enabled (partial) within able (whole).
Others exploit ones lack of self discernment by suggesting one to be incapable of something; when in reality...one wields the free will of choice within everything offered. Consenting to suggested "incapable" puts a restriction upon self-expression.
Sleight of hand from Madonna: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature"
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 3713208 1 point 1.5 yearsNov 22, 2023 01:55:48 ago (+1/-0)
Our ancestors created superior mythologies, where White people are the chosen race, backed up by history and science.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3634489 -1 points 1.5 yearsNov 22, 2023 03:56:05 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 1512763 1 point 1.5 yearsNov 22, 2023 01:51:56 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 4075459 0 points 1.5 yearsNov 22, 2023 03:30:27 ago (+0/-0)