The petitioners argued that there is little ambiguity in Section 3, which was mainly used before Jan. 6 to prevent former Confederates from taking control of the government after the Civil War. It prohibits those who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same” from holding state or federal office, unless granted amnesty by a two-thirds vote of Congress.
IOW this jewish law is about internal enemies.
And clearly none of this is unprecedented since its' doing exactly what it was designed to do. Nobody put this law to a vote.
[ + ] SirNiggsalot
[ - ] SirNiggsalot 0 points 1.5 yearsNov 18, 2023 16:27:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 1.5 yearsNov 18, 2023 21:02:26 ago (+0/-0)
IOW this jewish law is about internal enemies.
And clearly none of this is unprecedented since its' doing exactly what it was designed to do. Nobody put this law to a vote.
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 27, 2023 08:12:17 ago (+0/-0)
And the very idea that such decisions are in the hand of one person is absolutely crazy.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1.5 yearsNov 18, 2023 15:18:58 ago (+2/-0)
"Fight like hell" is inciting a insurrection, deez daze.
[ + ] Thyhorrorcosmic103
[ - ] Thyhorrorcosmic103 5 points 1.5 yearsNov 18, 2023 15:20:47 ago (+5/-0)