Sign into an existing account

Divide and conquer, oldest game in the book besides prostitution.

Yes this is good.

It can also be done against targets like bud light.

Some sources of power are:
Roles, relations, resources, reputation, will, knowledge, information, organizations, eloquence, charisma

The evil ones especially use reputational attacks. Destroying that ability is effective. Those they attack should be supported.

"The effectiveness of this strategy is that it is contagious. The act of protecting one individual at an institution against the public campaign against them necessarily means taking responsibility, which concentrates risk, which breaks their entire model."

Operationally sound. However, it requires access to the public forum. Which the supermajority of is opposition controlled. I will concede readily that the model you suggest works, -and was a major aspect of the checks and balances we find absent due to corruption of the "third house" / free press. (Carlson and veritas for instance seem to follow this model and have the public forum at the center of their operating modus, )

Our forefathers realized a free press as a NECESSITY of democracy. It has been utterly corrupted by zionist jews at this point. This is not conjecture. It is fact.

Barring a reformation, only the second amendment will correct our situation, but the population is insouciant.. I would suggest we continue exerting our energy towards red pilling. The Overton window has to slide more for the sheep to anger. -We ARE making progress.

"We don't need violence or a civil war to win against the regime."

You sound like a jew faggot.

Faggots should be burned alive for entertainment.

Yes, we must all just vote harder! Kek.

Anyone who says that violence isn't the answer is asking the wrong questions.

What I would do if I were the regime is start targeting the groups targeting my patsies, we can use establishment power to mobilize the majority of the population against this disruptive minority.
We can mobilize our pet paramilitaristic groups of "activists" against the subversives and use our media to damage them when they are forced into a fight with the paramilitary "activist" units.
In addition we can frame the members of this group for crimes (choosing particularly reputation-damaging ones that are also believable to the public) and arrest them with a conviction guaranteed.
Finally, we can send in people to infiltrate these groups and sow chaos within them such as by dividing them against each other on ideological divides that should be of secondary priority to the subversive cause, or push some vulnerable members into extremes that the rest would not be willing to follow them into, or simply undermining the trust of leadership, or any of the other myriad ways to undermine a cause and it's followers.

This comes across as if a woman wrote it.

Couldn't finish it. It appears to be written by a nigger who doesn't understand basic grammar.