Sign into an existing account

Wonder how that whole thing played out in Canada.

With their de facto enforced euthanasia. (But its ok they are not doing the same as the evil Nazis, they are the good ones)

remdesivir

Don't forget children having heart attacks.

Baaaaa 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑

The official treatment protocol was harmful and was killing people. If hospitals veered from the protocol, they weren't eligible for the payment.

Give your love one in the hospital ivermectin? Oh no the government death payment may be invalid! Better deny it.

If you kill someone with an axe, even in a hospital, in the ICU, it's murder. It's "deliberate".

But if you simply follow the medical protocals established and MANDATED by the WHO, the CDC, the AMA, and the us.gov (and punish anyone who varies from that approved (and fully subsidized) treatment or even speaks of alternatives), and you're getting paid for doing that, and those protocols keep killing your patients, well then, that's not "deliberate" at all, is it?

And best of all? You get to keep right on doing it, in full view of the public, and getting paid for it, and NOBODY is ever going to go to prison for it.

"They just keep, well, you know, dying. Not our fault really. Where's my check?"

Now explain how there is even an angstrom of difference between the outcomes.

I also seem to remember there was this big legal deal almost 80 years ago where they established that "I vas chust followink orders.", was not regarded as a valid legal defense.

intubation and high pressure ventilation leads to pulmonary edema and unrecoverable morbid pneumonia

We live in clown word. Is anything too far-fetched from what has been witnessed over the past 25 years?

So what you're saying is you are not informed as to the protocol and payments.