Nikki Haley Proposes Ban On Anonymous Social Media Accounts - Upgoat

Haley appears to be the whore which the deep state and jews have chosen. Don't minimize that when Trump keels over out of the blue from a "Heart Attack" and the networks roll him eating a cheeseburger 24/7 in his obit.

[ - ] Prairie 2 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 12:30:56 ago (+2/-0)

We need to ban all anonymous government operations. We should be able to see everything each employee is doing, including their full name and address.

[ - ] Leveraction 2 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 11:37:44 ago (+2/-0)

These fucking politicians just can't leave us alone. Someone get these jackasses a real job!

[ + ] Sector2

[ - ] Sector2 2 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 12:41:04 ago (+2/-0)

Their real job is herding the cattle. They and their co-workers are so good at it that the cattle just stamp their hooves on occasion and go back to chewing their cud.

[ + ] BannedEverwhere

[ - ] BannedEverwhere 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 19:17:26 ago (+0/-0)

We'll be killed if we do anything more.

[ - ] DeathTsunami 2 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 09:13:01 ago (+2/-0)

How does that work with bots?

[ - ] SteppingRazor 1 point 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 12:38:18 ago (+1/-0)

It’s also why they want to ban TikTok. They can’t control it like the other kiked platforms.

[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 08:44:42 ago (+1/-0)

she is a nimrata alright!

[ - ] Looneyskiproony 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 16, 2023 08:27:04 ago (+0/-0)

Fuck her!

[ - ] Looneyskiproony 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 16, 2023 08:22:48 ago (+0/-0)

Fuck her!

[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 20:50:06 ago (+0/-0)

Shabbos goy bitch. I hope she chokes on kike dick and dies.

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 19:40:33 ago (+0/-0)

What's the point of the internet if you can't slander people anonymously?

[ - ] PhantomXLII 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 16:02:36 ago (+0/-0)

I've already willed that Haley is banned from her free trial of life.

Pay up, bitch.

[ - ] Jinglebanger 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 09:39:35 ago (+3/-3)*

It seems like she essentially wants everyone to have to submit ID for a social media account. Doesn't say anything about that information being public. So it's literally the same as things are now, just with an extra step. Unless you're practicing an inordinate level of opsec, these social media companies already know who you are regardless.

I'd actually be for a version of this that makes the information public. You guys are sitting here thinking about "oh no, my boss is going to find out I shitpost" or getting canceled. I'm thinking about all these kikes, antifa, and bots getting exposed and how they would go underground immediately. I think you all forget how many people like us are around. One of their best weapons right now is they can single people out for harassment, and our greatest weakness a general passivity. What are they going to be left with if people are forced to openly embrace their beliefs and unite en masses? Their way of dealing with political opponents doesn't work at a sufficiently large scale; you can't cancel too many people, because they will just get together and create their own platforms.

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 13:50:12 ago (+1/-1)

deleted

[ + ] BannedEverwhere

[ - ] BannedEverwhere 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 19:23:11 ago (+0/-0)

I'm thinking about all these kikes, antifa, and bots getting exposed and how they would go underground immediately.

They already post on their real names and make little effort to conceal where they live, it's us that would be silenced or killed by laws like this.

I think you all forget how many people like us are around

Doesn't matter, either we submit or die so of course we'll be forced to submit.

One of their best weapons right now is they can single people out for harassment, and our greatest weakness a general passivity. What are they going to be left with if people are forced to openly embrace their beliefs and unite en masses?

We won't be "forced to openly embrace our beliefs" we'll be pidgeonholed into vocally supporting the current thing and never discussing anything beyond expressing our love of products(because talking negatively about certain products is also enough to get canceled). You won't even be able to just stay off the internet because lack of footprint would also be suspicious.

[ + ] yesiknow

[ - ] yesiknow -1 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 13:12:30 ago (+0/-1)

You have a valid point, but before the internet they had total control of media, and brainwashed everyone.

It's about people wanting and desiring the government to control personal inabilities to think. That was lost to the media control. Getting government out of dictating personalities is a task not completed. It's obvious people need a moral foundation, and that is NOT NOT NOT the government's job.

[ - ] NoRefunds -1 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 08:43:07 ago (+0/-1)

This thread has been made how many times, but still, social media isn't something anyone needs.... It's all government owned... This is why the government is telling you how you have to use it... So stop using it. Would you go login to the police department website and upload your photos? That's what social media is

[ + ] we_kill_creativity

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 6 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 09:28:09 ago (+6/-0)

Do you not realize she's talking about us and this place...?

[ + ] Sal_180

[ - ] Sal_180 [op] 3 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 11:01:02 ago (+3/-0)

It starts with "think of the children" ban on porn unless you register an id. People will be afraid of speaking out about that because they'll be called a pervert. In 6-7 more years it'll be expanded and called "security" against "terrorists" and it'll be across all internet

[ + ] NoRefunds

[ - ] NoRefunds 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 10:46:22 ago (+0/-0)

Then we go further underground! To the mircmobile!

[ + ] BannedEverwhere

[ - ] BannedEverwhere 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 19:24:53 ago (+0/-0)

It's the only way we have to communicate with each other so yes actually I would.

[ - ] PrincessRobotBubblegum -1 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 07:51:19 ago (+3/-4)

This is not Nikki Haley.

In what dungeon is she?

This is polite puppetry.

Like their unelected VP:

Yet not Mountie, nor RIP.

Clockwork ticky tacky talk.

Brek! Kek! Kek! Kek!

Earwigs!

Chirping!

Charade!

They are holding her hostage!

Holding her hostage!

No: her hostage!

Cuckoo! Cuckoo!

Honk! Honk!

END SCENE

[ + ] Leveraction

[ - ] Leveraction 5 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 11:42:39 ago (+5/-0)

Bullshit.
She's doing this because she's being paid off. She doesn't give a flying fuck about your rights,all she cares about is the highest bidder for her whoring

[ - ] TheGreatWar -2 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 10:03:58 ago (+0/-2)

Rockstar name tho.

[ + ] Clubberlang

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 19:44:10 ago (+0/-0)

If her middle name was Six

Sign into an existing account

Nikki Haley Proposes Ban On Anonymous Social Media Accounts submitted by Sal_180 to whatever 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 07:20:41 ago (+31/-0) (dailycaller.com)https://dailycaller.com/2023/11/14/farewell-catturd-nikki-haley-proposes-ban-on-anonymous-social-media-accounts/

Nikki Haley Proposes Ban On Anonymous Social Media Accounts
submitted by Sal_180 to whatever 1.6 yearsNov 15, 2023 07:20:41 ago (+31/-0) (dailycaller.com)
https://dailycaller.com/2023/11/14/farewell-catturd-nikki-haley-proposes-ban-on-anonymous-social-media-accounts/