Sign into an existing account

Then I'm just talking about the few jews who have managed to take the highest position. I am only focused upon finding what works best for achieving our goals, and am not so bullhead that I fail to recognize the examples that have been set.

This is why every code of honor includes respecting your enemy, because contempt for them will only blind you to the best lessons you could receive from the greatest teacher you could have.

You must understand them, and see what opportunities they can provide you.


Yes, and history has shown this to be a winning strategy. You are one of those bratty losers who throws a tantrum whenever you take an L, complaining that your opponent broke some arbitrary set of rules that exists only in your head, this is not a game, this is the real world, and it does not come with rules. If they had beaten you by whatever standard youd set for then, you would simply change your definition of fair play and say whatever victory they achieved over you doesn't count. You are pathetic and this attitude can only lead to you defeating yourself by refusing to adapt.


Interesting that you'd call them you neighbour, as if you are supposed to be friendly and work together. I see them as an enemy, perhaps this is the root of our differences. An enemy is supposed to want you to experience misfortunes, a neighbour isn't.

Again this is you sticking with a playstyle that fails in the meta, and then when you get rekt by someone who takes the win with a meta strat, you refuse to adapt to the meta, you just stomp your feet as you continue to lose.

The way they beat you is disgusting only because you lose to it. You entertain these noble ideas that none of your ancestors practiced. Everyone simply did what worked best for themselves. Using diversity or subversion is not something Europeans were foreign to, they also engaged in it against their foes because of how effective it was.


Normally I forgive bad grammar but Jesus that last part was painful to read, I get the point though.

Jews don't create civilizations they conquer them from within, that seems to be a superior move, to parasitize the efforts of another people. Perhaps when we are wiped out they would then go into the business of building something, but perhaps they would only need to maintain what was built for them by us. They presently run the countries we constructed, why would they ever have to build something from scratch after we are extinct? Perhaps we wouldn't die out and some would be kept as slaves or serfs.

What they are doing is playing a game where the greatest of our people are weakened, as are the greatest of nations being brought low, it is so that none may challenge them as they consolidate their hegemonic power over us. It's actually very clever. Also we've made a lot of scientific and technological progress in the last decade, why do we need to be on the moon right now for it to count as progress?


Yes, which is aka "the whites will always submit themselves to the jews after their contenptuous parents cast the jews out". All the more reason to learn outer lessons from them and adopt their mindset and strategies. It's the only way we can beat them, is to use their tactics against them.

Contempt is self destructive because it causes you to fail to learn the lessons that can save you.

Imagine that white people did emulate the most effective techniques of the jews, blacks, and other races which had produced returns for them.

Imagine that they established a glorious kingdom by doing so. Imagine you were there to see it. I highly doubt you would decry it for the way it was accomplished, you'd hold it up with pride as a representation of the accomplishments of your people. That's the kind of coward that you seem to be.

---

Now that I've responded to your pints, I got one of my own: I notice that bothered in your post did you ever bring up one pragmatic argument against my suggestion. Indeed, you admitted time and again that what they do works, and that it had proven to be especially effective against us. All you have is moral indignation, perhaps you should pick up a lick of strategy and start thinking things out in terms of practicality.

I said they always come back, which means their ways are resilient. But if what they are is vengeful, then isn't that a point in favor of revenge seeking behavior?

The point is that their successes bear credit to their actions, and if we want to be successful we need to cut the contempt, stop being salty bitches, and embrace the present meta. If we want to beat them we must at least do as well as they are, and that means doing what they are doing to succeed.

Identify what works to their favor, reengineer it to suit our needs, and then imitate their actions to yield similar or greater rewards.

Every time an underdog has beaten a superior force they did so by learning from their enemy and adopting useful things from them.

Every battle is like X-Com, you must become your enemy to some extent in order to beat them, this involves understanding them and their motivations, but also meeting their tactics or technologies to maintain a competitive edge against them.

It's not their behavior that makes them bad, its that they and us have become mutual threats to the existence of the other. They are not us, that's what sets us apart from them, not what they do, but who they are.