×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
5
16 comments block


[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 11:10:11 ago (+2/-0)

Where is it shown that any US ships have been "targetted"?

[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 3 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 11:26:08 ago (+3/-0)

Putin just informed Biden that the "2 U.S. carrier groups are within the range of Russian hypersonic missiles."

Nothing else was said. No direct threats issued.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 11:37:05 ago (+2/-0)

This seems to suggest that our ships will be targeted if we decide to get involved with another regional dispute that has nothing to do with US interests.

[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 0 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 11:40:26 ago (+1/-1)

Russia wouldn't dare to kill 5,000 U.S. sailors in one single attack on a U.S. carrier.

It would kick off an exchange of M.O.A.B.S and nukes.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1 yearOct 19, 2023 11:43:31 ago (+1/-0)

The US would destroy the planet over 5000 sailors? Sure about that?

[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 1 point 1 yearOct 19, 2023 11:52:25 ago (+2/-1)

People are living in, or very near the sites of Nagasaki, Hiroshima, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima.

An exchange of 50 nukes wouldn't "destroy the planet."

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 11:59:21 ago (+2/-0)

When they nuked Japan, the bombs were tiny (compared to today's nukes) and there weren't a dozen countries that possessed them and had the ability to deliver them to their enemy. Russia has more nukes than the US. The US retaliating against Russia by using nukes would certainly destroy the planet.

Granted, our "Commander in chief" would push the bottom thinking he was ordering room service.

"Just sign it, Joe" - Kamala Harris, Obama puppet.

[ - ] KosherHiveKicker -1 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 12:02:51 ago (+0/-1)

You did notice that I also mentioned the use of M.O.A.B.S, correct?

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 12:10:42 ago (+2/-0)

Yes. And, that's fair. I don't think Russia fears the MOABS like some muzzie sand nigger country might. Russia claims the ability to destroy our GPS satellites, and we know they have drones capable of Mach 9 that can deliver huge conventional payloads, as well. With China and Russia (and the other BRICS) openly shitting on the US and the EU, while improving their position in Africa, I doubt we could win a conventional war against them.

But to the point. Russia will target US ships if the US gets involved in a regional conflict that has nothing to do with US interests. Whether it be in Ukraine or Iran.

[ - ] HelenHighwater 1 point 1 yearOct 19, 2023 12:30:51 ago (+1/-0)

And Biden replied "C'mon man! It like when you want to know...uh..the people have this...right...We would all talk about this at the dinner table...uh...and..we need to...we have to...god...like I said to Beau the other day..you can't just take the...c'mon man!"

[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 14:27:27 ago (+0/-0)

Did he really say that though?

[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 1 point 1 yearOct 19, 2023 14:30:35 ago (+1/-0)

Yes.

"These missiles have a range of more than 1,000 kilometers," Putin said after the US sent powerful aircraft carriers to the Mediterranean in support of Israel.

"This is not a threat, but an attempt to maintain control of the situation in the Mediterranean."

[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 15:31:59 ago (+0/-0)

Nowadays I tend not to believe anything in the 'news', esp. translated by a nigger diversity hire

[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 14:27:03 ago (+0/-0)

I guess a nigger did the translation of that article, wtf

[ - ] Version6 0 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 15:53:31 ago (+0/-0)

Isn't it an auto translate via Google?

[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 1 yearOct 19, 2023 16:02:02 ago (+0/-0)

supposedly