Sign into an existing account

I know for a fact this is not entirely true. I was out scouting some new hunting spots when I ran into him. I walked around the corner of this rock outcrop and there he was right in front of me. His back was to me and he was sort of hunched over and bracing himself with one arm against a tree and appeared to be experiencing a seizure or some similar malady. I stopped and froze in shock as my brain tried to process what my eyes were telling it. That's a bigfoot. Yep. He's leaning against this tree right in front of me. Yep. He seems to be hurt or something. Nope. It was at that point the bastard, still leaning on that tree, turns half towards me and it was only then that I fully realized what was going on. This giant, hairy brute is jerking himself off!

He called out to me as I was frantically fleeing back from whence I came and I will never forget what he said to me. "They'll never believe you!"

And I'll be damned if that giant sunovabitch wasn't right. So, in conclusion, he does tell the truth. At least some of the time.

TIL: Bigfoot is a politician.

Those time-travel bathroom breaks occur more often as you age.

No u.

I am not traveling through time. I am traveling through "change" as GottaGasEmAll correctly pointed out.

That being said, the implied idea of time travel is to jump backwards or forwards by a considerable amount, rather than just ride the current time.

As to the answers to those questions - in previous posts, I have given my ideas, the conclusion of which is that both time travel and teleportation are and will be impossible.

The question isn't necessarily asking about living vs dead cells, but rather the idea of how to define and create the boundary. The living cells was just an example based on the 1984 movie "Terminator" and their concept of time travel.

If the mind is an external connection, an analogy would be to take a long trip in a car, but forget to pack. All of the comforts reside in your local residence, and not being able to take them produces an effect, right? This is something that the mind/brain/soul dilemma poses. It is definitely a longer conversation.

Your last question of superposition - along with the question of space-time - is a good one as well.

Is the physical appearance based on a position relative to a single point? or is it based on a reference point to the universe? Does that reference point follow through time, or is it based on the current time?

For example, the earth right now is billions of miles removed from where it was a year ago in the universe, right? With universe expansion, galaxy rotation, etc. Where is the physical "landing" point?

And even a relative point varies with time - think of standing right now on the top of buried ruins to a city, going back to a time when the city was alive, wouldn't that "land" the person in the air, and they would fall to their possible death when transported?

The ideas of time travel and teleportation mostly deal with breaking the body down into the basic particles, and then reassembling them back together in the new location, without having any equipment in the landing zone? Very unlikely.

I like the theory of heaven being a cloud outside of the multiverse, and death being a respawning into another timeline.

In the cloud outside of the multiverse, every timeline can be seen and all things are known, but when inside of a timeline/universe, only limited knowledge of the outside can be retained, only experiential learning along that timeline can be gathered. Sucks that so much knowledge is out there somewhere, but unattainable, but that is life I guess.