Putting aside the entire argument of "the coal-fired electric car with the ten mile long exhaust pipe", when the very foundation of your entire EV paradigm is based upon a society that is NOT randomly populated with savage nigger assholes, it is destined to fail.
You want to design an EV charging station that will survive and function in THIS world?
Simple. Put a stainless steel test fixture, set in concrete, in the exercise yard of a maximum security prison.
Put a sign on it that you will pay a small "donation" into the commissary account of anyone that can break it.
When they succeed (and they will), pay the donation, review the recordings, fix it again, redesigning and re-inforcing what they broke.
Repeat as necessary. When you reach a point where the yard niggers are no longer capable of breaking it, you have finalized your basic design.
I want a steam engine car. It can be designed to burn gasoline to heat the water, but in a pinch, you can piss in the boiler and chop down a tree to get back on the road.
To those who are commenting sarcastically, u/bossman131 is probably not the one who made the video. He incorporated the video title in his post title. You guys should have clicked on the link and read the description of the video.
Electric cars are an intermediate step, as you'll see in the not distant future. Industry and governments are preparing for a hydrogen fuel economy. Most cars will have a small electric battery for local driving and primirily be fueled by hydrogen. If you are not lazy and know how to search you can find out about the research and work going into this. I think it will be almost universal by 2040.
Hydrogen is too inefficient. Water is also the biggest greenhouse gas, so I don't see how they can transition the world to cars that emit water vapor while claiming to be combating climate change. The real long-term plan is to stop people from driving cars.
Look, redditor: no one claims I speak for them except for your fat, lazy ass. You clearly believe you are far more knowledgeable than you really are, which is why your life is shit. Maybe check your own limits in the future. What I'm referring to is not elite knowledge, it's easily found by someone doing even a cursory search. You can do something as simple as look for "hydrogen fuel economy" to find reports from top "energy engineers" that discuss this. You are too lazy to do that, so here's a link to a major chemical company's website pushing this shit: https://www.ineos.com/inch-magazine/articles/issue-22/hydrogen---fuel-of-the-future/
If you want to be more than a faggy midwit, look into how hydrogen for fuel is created. What are the natural gas input sources and their differences? Are major industrial centers putting money into infrastructure for this? That is the sort of thing that will tell you if it's serious or just marketing. Hint: it's serious.
Look, redditor: no one claims I speak for them except for your fat, lazy ass. You clearly believe you are far more knowledgeable than you really are, which is why your life is shit. Maybe check your own limits in the future.
Project more, retard.
You can do something as simple as look for "hydrogen fuel economy" to find reports from top "energy engineers" that discuss this. You are too lazy to do that, so here's a link to a major chemical company's website pushing this shit:
You're too retarded to understand that there world is full of "top energy engineers" pulling in different directions -- solar, wind, nuclear, fossil fuels, etc. You even link to a chemical company that has a financial stake in hydrogen:
"INEOS recently launched a new hydrogen-focused business which has just one aim: to cut CO2 emissions."
Wow, I'm sure they're going to give you a totally balanced view, right? Big brain sources.
You can find articles from "top energy engineers" going the other way:
o Hydrogen is energy intensive to produce and transport, reducing its efficiency. o It has low volumetric efficiency. o It produces water vapor, the most intense greenhouse gas on Earth.
Again, your arrogance and ignorance are riding the tandem bike that is your tiny brain. Yes, INEOS and other euro companies are massive faggots. The "green revolution" is real there and they absolutely are destroying their energy infrastructure in favor of less efficient models. This is widely known - see Germany shutting down nuclear reactors and dismantling their pipeline NG. The fact that is bad for their industrial output is irrelevant to a bunch of Satanists. This is a factor in why hydrogen fuel cells are viable in the future - people are willing to trade some efficiency for a perceived "clean burning" benefit.
Now you quote Nature, and repeat a bunch of shitlib, redditor-tier tropes. It's obvious who you are, and that is a homosexual.
I was going to share real industrial information about natgas-sourced hydrogen production improvements, 10 year plans to build generation, and links showing developments that improve efficiency in hydrogen cells that bring it to an adequate level for commercial use, but I don't lay pearls before swine. Good luck finding it yourself (you won't, because you're gay and dumb).
Again, your arrogance and ignorance are riding the tandem bike that is your tiny brain.
More projection from the retard.
This is widely known - see Germany shutting down nuclear reactors and dismantling their pipeline NG.
And do you know what happened when the rubber hit the road? They fired up coal plants. There's hype around all kinds of approaches. Hydrogen has to compete among them all, and it has its detractors. Why burn natural gas to create hydrogen when you can just produce electricity directly? Even the "carbon zero" freaks make that argument.
Now you quote Nature, and repeat a bunch of shitlib, redditor-tier tropes. It's obvious who you are, and that is a homosexual.
Lulz, you link to a for-profit chemical company trying to make a buck on "net zero", but then question my nature source. Not only did I give you a source, I gave you FACTS, 'tard. Now go hype hydrogen like a good useful idiot.
The end is where you reveal your fundamental error. I'm not here to hype hydrogen - it's weird that you assume that I am. This is also how we know you're a faggot shitlib - this sort of mentality is theirs exclusively. My passing mention of hydrogen being planned as the future of fuel is merely the notation of a true thing that is evident in reading on the topic. I have no opinion one way or the other about it - as far as I'm concerned we should just keep using petrol.
Regarding your point about the Germans switching to coal - that's correct. It supports the notion that they'll switch to hydrogen, too, despite the fact that many green evangelist retards think it's not clean enough. Industrialists don't care about that they care about what is practical. Hydrogen is emerging as a genuinely viable option for using as a primary fuel energy input. Your inability to accept this possiblity is your own failure - it makes no difference to me that you choose to remain stupid and gay. Remember to get your booster.
The end is where you reveal your fundamental error. I'm not here to hype hydrogen - it's weird that you assume that I am.
You bought into it and promoted it as the future without looking at the landscape -- and that includes "green" energy promoters and "top energy engineers". That makes you a useful idiot.
[ + ] ilikeskittles
[ - ] ilikeskittles 7 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 10:22:54 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 6 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 10:34:18 ago (+6/-0)*
You want to design an EV charging station that will survive and function in THIS world?
Simple. Put a stainless steel test fixture, set in concrete, in the exercise yard of a maximum security prison.
Put a sign on it that you will pay a small "donation" into the commissary account of anyone that can break it.
When they succeed (and they will), pay the donation, review the recordings, fix it again, redesigning and re-inforcing what they broke.
Repeat as necessary. When you reach a point where the yard niggers are no longer capable of breaking it, you have finalized your basic design.
Now try it out in "the wild".
[ + ] Puller_of_Noses
[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 3 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 11:13:28 ago (+3/-0)
It can be designed to burn gasoline to heat the water, but in a pinch, you can piss in the boiler and chop down a tree to get back on the road.
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 3 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 12:47:04 ago (+3/-0)*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_05tcpmyUU
Any infantryman will tell you that the worst ride is better than the best walk. And you can cook lunch with it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuQZbclLTWU
[ + ] Autismo
[ - ] Autismo 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 12:06:15 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Trope
[ - ] Trope 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 22:54:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 2 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 10:49:20 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Lost_In_The_Thinking
[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 15:55:22 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 1 point 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 12:22:41 ago (+1/-0)
Well fuck new cars then.
[ + ] rabidR04CH
[ - ] rabidR04CH 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 17:49:22 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 16:40:40 ago (+0/-0)
They are trying to drive-off, or kill everyone to take it over.
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 15:56:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 16:01:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 20:54:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 21:01:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 25, 2023 12:45:29 ago (+0/-0)
If you want to be more than a faggy midwit, look into how hydrogen for fuel is created. What are the natural gas input sources and their differences? Are major industrial centers putting money into infrastructure for this? That is the sort of thing that will tell you if it's serious or just marketing. Hint: it's serious.
Next, kys.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 25, 2023 13:51:06 ago (+0/-0)
Project more, retard.
You're too retarded to understand that there world is full of "top energy engineers" pulling in different directions -- solar, wind, nuclear, fossil fuels, etc. You even link to a chemical company that has a financial stake in hydrogen:
"INEOS recently launched a new hydrogen-focused business which has just one aim: to cut CO2 emissions."
Wow, I'm sure they're going to give you a totally balanced view, right? Big brain sources.
You can find articles from "top energy engineers" going the other way:
"Overhyping hydrogen as a fuel risks endangering net-zero goals"
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03693-6
Here are FACTS working against hydrogen:
o Hydrogen is energy intensive to produce and transport, reducing its efficiency.
o It has low volumetric efficiency.
o It produces water vapor, the most intense greenhouse gas on Earth.
Argue facts, retard, not hype.
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 25, 2023 14:13:02 ago (+0/-0)
Now you quote Nature, and repeat a bunch of shitlib, redditor-tier tropes. It's obvious who you are, and that is a homosexual.
I was going to share real industrial information about natgas-sourced hydrogen production improvements, 10 year plans to build generation, and links showing developments that improve efficiency in hydrogen cells that bring it to an adequate level for commercial use, but I don't lay pearls before swine. Good luck finding it yourself (you won't, because you're gay and dumb).
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 25, 2023 15:15:42 ago (+0/-0)
More projection from the retard.
And do you know what happened when the rubber hit the road? They fired up coal plants. There's hype around all kinds of approaches. Hydrogen has to compete among them all, and it has its detractors. Why burn natural gas to create hydrogen when you can just produce electricity directly? Even the "carbon zero" freaks make that argument.
Lulz, you link to a for-profit chemical company trying to make a buck on "net zero", but then question my nature source. Not only did I give you a source, I gave you FACTS, 'tard. Now go hype hydrogen like a good useful idiot.
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 25, 2023 15:32:26 ago (+0/-0)
Regarding your point about the Germans switching to coal - that's correct. It supports the notion that they'll switch to hydrogen, too, despite the fact that many green evangelist retards think it's not clean enough. Industrialists don't care about that they care about what is practical. Hydrogen is emerging as a genuinely viable option for using as a primary fuel energy input. Your inability to accept this possiblity is your own failure - it makes no difference to me that you choose to remain stupid and gay. Remember to get your booster.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 25, 2023 15:34:37 ago (+0/-0)
You bought into it and promoted it as the future without looking at the landscape -- and that includes "green" energy promoters and "top energy engineers". That makes you a useful idiot.
[ + ] Leveraction
[ - ] Leveraction 0 points 1.6 yearsSep 24, 2023 11:39:51 ago (+0/-0)
Did you just wake up to this fact captain genius? Are you purposely retarded or just delusional?