And if any of you think for one second that those fucking sociopath "researchers" would have acted any differently had the subjects been human, I got some more bad news for you.
Musk won't show us the actual monkeys because they're all dead. Given the experiment took place less than five years ago, that's not a very good sign for the tech being viable in human trials. If even one chimp had lived long enough to do a five second tech demo, it would have been a revolutionary breakthrough. If they could have shown us the implant working, they obviously would have done that for the free stock boost. It would have been on every news channel 24/7 for a month.
Does sound like the surgery rather than the device is a stronger reason for the problems.
If fauxi can cherry pick data - or that nigger that just got fired for falsifying research for 20 years - then surely this is a clear cut case of "you see what you want".
Yes, the monkeys had to be put down after the implant, but was it because of the "use" of the device, or because the surgery went poorly?
It doesn't matter if it is a splinter, or a silicon micro-chip. The swarming White Blood cells cause the inflammation which leads to discomfort, and subjects picking-scratching the implant site. The human brain also has an huge amount of blood flow to it, and this increased flow amplifies the rejection process.
There is a HUGE difference between titanium plates on the skull, and implants that are placed INSIDE the brain's protective membrane.
Is the implant made of materials that will produce rejection? If yes, that is a materials problem, not a neurolink problem.
Is the device sending rogue electrical impulses and killing monkeys? If yes, that is a neurolink problem.
Are the screws becoming loose and causing irritation for the test subjects? If yes, that is a mechanical/surgical problem.
In the data analysis, only one of these yeses is going to be reported as a problem for neurolink.
There were at least 20 monkeys in the study (going by the numberings) and if only a few had any problems, and none of them reported any effects from electrical signals due to the use of the device, then those probably won't show up in the research summary.
How did pfizer get away with killing so many people with the vaxx? By cherry picking data exactly like this - and it is a standard practice in pretty much all research.
[ + ] zongongo
[ - ] zongongo 4 points 8 monthsSep 23, 2023 18:32:16 ago (+4/-0)
HITLER was right.
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 1 point 8 monthsSep 23, 2023 23:07:32 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SmokeyMeadow
[ - ] SmokeyMeadow 1 point 8 monthsSep 23, 2023 20:03:14 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 8 monthsSep 23, 2023 18:08:43 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 8 monthsSep 23, 2023 17:31:30 ago (+1/-1)
If fauxi can cherry pick data - or that nigger that just got fired for falsifying research for 20 years - then surely this is a clear cut case of "you see what you want".
Yes, the monkeys had to be put down after the implant, but was it because of the "use" of the device, or because the surgery went poorly?
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 5 points 8 monthsSep 23, 2023 17:54:04 ago (+5/-0)*
It doesn't matter if it is a splinter, or a silicon micro-chip. The swarming White Blood cells cause the inflammation which leads to discomfort, and subjects picking-scratching the implant site. The human brain also has an huge amount of blood flow to it, and this increased flow amplifies the rejection process.
There is a HUGE difference between titanium plates on the skull, and implants that are placed INSIDE the brain's protective membrane.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 3 points 8 monthsSep 23, 2023 18:12:43 ago (+4/-1)
Is the implant made of materials that will produce rejection? If yes, that is a materials problem, not a neurolink problem.
Is the device sending rogue electrical impulses and killing monkeys? If yes, that is a neurolink problem.
Are the screws becoming loose and causing irritation for the test subjects? If yes, that is a mechanical/surgical problem.
In the data analysis, only one of these yeses is going to be reported as a problem for neurolink.
There were at least 20 monkeys in the study (going by the numberings) and if only a few had any problems, and none of them reported any effects from electrical signals due to the use of the device, then those probably won't show up in the research summary.
How did pfizer get away with killing so many people with the vaxx? By cherry picking data exactly like this - and it is a standard practice in pretty much all research.
[ + ] GottaGasEmAll
[ - ] GottaGasEmAll 0 points 8 monthsSep 23, 2023 16:13:09 ago (+0/-0)