First, the video:
https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1705235549403902209notice, the "go home fascists!" chanting, and black-bloc.
Now notice the canadians "for education over indoctrination": All wearing red hats, with white text "save canada."
Text book look-alike designed to elicit fear/hatred/violence responses from the small leftwing segment of the public, who have been trained to respond this way by media. monkey see, monkey do. Thats what the trump protests were about. Pavlovian training for the CIA color change tactics that were to shortly follow in the form of the blm/antifa riots.
Notice the random minor scuffling, or 'street theater' brawling. Was the same that we saw with a lot of the 'confrontations' between the left and the 'right' in videos all over the 'alternative news'.
What you are seeing is not information designed to inform you about a protest where antifa/lgbtq/blm/trannies/etc showed up to attack citizens protesting against indoctrination in schools.
What you are seeing is a fear-op, where both sides are in fact antifa in different costums, designed to make the public afraid or at least hesitant to publicly gather (and thats the critical goal, reduce the change of anyone right-of-stalin from gathering in opposition to anything and any policies the neo-bolshevik movement's occupation government engages in).
And now you know.
[ + ] Hand_Of_Node
[ - ] Hand_Of_Node 1 point 8 monthsSep 22, 2023 17:32:33 ago (+1/-0)
That's not what people who want to effect or prevent change do unless the effects are intended for the audience itself.
Protesting itself is a form of public weakness. "We want things to be different so what we're going to do is tell you that."
What you're saying is the scuffling and brawling is actually public service theater to dissuade the discontent from dissipating their determination in a detrimental direction?
[ + ] WanderingToast
[ - ] WanderingToast 1 point 8 monthsSep 22, 2023 21:11:34 ago (+1/-0)
A protest is supposed to be a threat to riot against the state. This time we're asking, if we come back were coming for you Mr gov'ment.
This btw is super effective and has a near 100% success rate. This is why protest movements are infiltrated so hard. Any tactics but the ones that work are the order of the day.
The government infiltration and diversion of tactics...tactic also has a near 100% success rate.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 8 monthsSep 23, 2023 08:58:35 ago (+0/-0)
Very astute insight, however it assumes the regime is a monolith rather than being composed of factions. We can see this clearly by simply asking what the current mode of the state is: anocracy, or semi-democracy. This usually follows from factions vying for power. This is that. One faction definitely wants protests, the other doesn't.
In reference to the question, partially yes, they want to dissuade the public from dissipating populist anger. My guess is they are just hoping to keep the genie in the bottle. Also explains the push toward 15 minute cities. How revolutions and civil wars happen is they start with street protests. It's also how color revolutions happen. I wish I had the study on hand, but one was done for australia I think, and indicated that protests over about 100k people, with that right conditions, become self-sustaining, a huge risk factor to any state.
The other factor, which still surprises me, is that the width and configuration of streets (of all things) could make or break protests and riots. Explains why the push to burn down cities (blm, antifa, the hawaii fires, california and oregon, etc), and why the push to 15 minute cities, and changing the zoning laws, all of it.
The regime (in the u.s. at least) doesn't think it can win a civil war or revolution if one happened to pop-off.
And so we get all this reverse psychology propaganda, these anons online "dont do anything. Thats what the government WANTS so they can get martial law!"
And I keep telling people, personally I'm against civil war itself, and things should be kept legal and peaceful, but there is a wide range of tactics within the definition of what constitutes legal and peaceful, and that people need to start getting far and away more aggressive about organizing and pursuing those tactics within the limits of the law.
The reason this country hasn't exploded into conflict already is precisely because both sides of the uniparty and the intelligence community and the media complex are all fighting like mad to prevent that, because they know they can't reverse it once the situation unravels.
This tactic they're pursuing, of using street theater, with controlled sides, is an attempt to keep people from organizing at all. They consider the risk of the pressure cooker effect less of a danger than the immediate risk of what happens if protests are allowed to form unhindered.