It says it MAY cause an increased risk for the jabbed, not that it WILL cause an increased risk, therefore we've rated this false. Meanwhile, Trump's statement that he wanted to temporarily halt travel from countries with a high risk of terrorism means he wanted to execute all muslims in the streets, you bigots.
Sounds about like (((Snopes))) alright. But what do you expect from a company founded by a fat cat lady and her fat soyboy husband who spent company money on hookers.
They say it is false but then go on to support that it is true only highlighting the word "may." They are gaslighting. They must be hoping that people will see the "False" designation and move on.
[ - ] Osmanthus 1 point 8 monthsSep 5, 2023 16:51:38 ago (+1/-0)
Actual snopes explanation is: "The sentence about the new variant being "more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines" did not compare vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated. The summary stated that those who had previously been infected or vaccinated may be more susceptible to this variant compared to previous variants."
This could very well be what they intended to mean with that sentence. But that's is not what it says and we are left to parse the meaning.
Is it an honest linguistic ambiguity, or is a slimy way to admit the truth while pushing another vaccine to the trusting who will interpret it in a less sinister way?
We know it's all bullshit, so the question really is why did the CDC admit that the vaccines aren't working? Is it just that it's time for the new lockdowns, so they have to admit that vaccines aren't enough?
[ + ] uvulectomy
[ - ] uvulectomy 3 points 8 monthsSep 5, 2023 12:09:45 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Niggly_Puff
[ - ] Niggly_Puff 4 points 8 monthsSep 5, 2023 13:04:02 ago (+4/-0)
Seriously.. look at their reasoning for labelling it false. Absolute kikes.
[ + ] uvulectomy
[ - ] uvulectomy 2 points 8 monthsSep 5, 2023 15:14:03 ago (+2/-0)
Sounds about like (((Snopes))) alright. But what do you expect from a company founded by a fat cat lady and her fat soyboy husband who spent company money on hookers.
[ + ] Inward
[ - ] Inward 0 points 8 monthsSep 6, 2023 05:56:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] KyleIsThisTall
[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 1 point 8 monthsSep 5, 2023 21:46:16 ago (+1/-0)
they injections were poison to destroy immune systems
[ + ] Osmanthus
[ - ] Osmanthus 1 point 8 monthsSep 5, 2023 16:51:38 ago (+1/-0)
"The sentence about the new variant being "more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines" did not compare vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated. The summary stated that those who had previously been infected or vaccinated may be more susceptible to this variant compared to previous variants."
This could very well be what they intended to mean with that sentence.
But that's is not what it says and we are left to parse the meaning.
Is it an honest linguistic ambiguity, or is a slimy way to admit the truth while pushing another vaccine to the trusting who will interpret it in a less sinister way?
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 2 points 8 monthsSep 6, 2023 04:30:44 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker [op] 0 points 8 monthsSep 5, 2023 17:09:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] kammmmak
[ - ] kammmmak 0 points 8 monthsSep 5, 2023 15:42:57 ago (+0/-0)