I'm living well within my means, not dumping a government check on frivolous expenses like air force ones or beats by dre. I'm attending meetup groups and making friends, aren't breaking the law, trying to be a net positive influence on the society in which I live. Also looking for a place to stay, but the housing market is terrible and all shelters are full. Wanting to build myself a cabin in the woods but the government gets in the way.
a) ones consent to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality)...ignorance represents the hood, hence blinded by ignorance.
b) true vs false implies reasoning over suggested...a conflict shaped by ones consent.
c) true (wanting suggested) vs false (not wanting suggested) distracts from change (perceivable). Consenting to hold onto either side (by believing or disbelieving) tempts one to ignore change.
getting in trouble for lying
How do the few get away with lying? Suggesting denial and keep going. What does that work? Because denial takes way less effort than trying to prove a truth, which depletes the resistance of those trying rapidly.
Why are the truth-tellers burning out; while the liars celebrate one burned offering after another? Because motion (inception towards death) consumes heat (life).
How do the few get away with lying? Suggesting denial and keep going. What does that work? Because denial takes way less effort than trying to prove a truth, which depletes the resistance of those trying rapidly.
Why are the truth-tellers burning out; while the liars celebrate one burned offering after another? Because motion (inception towards death) consumes heat (life).
a) reasoning (truth vs lie) over suggested information (affixed definition) implies ones ignorance of perceivable (flowing inspiration). One needs to resist reason (truth vs lie) for implication (if change, then...). Reason tempts one to hold onto a side; while implication implies one to adapt as center (life) to surrounding (inception towards death).
b) Nature doesn't lie; nor does it brand any truth...it simply moves everything within forwards. Choosing to hold onto anything (information) while within motion (inspiration) tempts one to ignore latter for former.
Try this...apply implication (if/then) onto reason (truth vs lie). If life represents truth; then death represents lie. That implies that truth has a shelf-life before expiring, hence every truth changes into a lie.
c) counter (contrary to the right course) tempts one to ignore being (life) within only course (inception towards death). Others suggest contrarianism to tempt one to ignore that. If one consents (want or not want) to anything suggested; then ones mind will be stuck within the contrarianism of reason (want versus not want), hence always within conflict; no matter which side one chooses.
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 2, 2023 21:49:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 2, 2023 22:02:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 17:40:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 18:14:23 ago (+0/-0)
I'm homeless, but employed at multiple jobs, working to support myself.
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 20:24:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist [op] 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 20:30:24 ago (+0/-0)
I'm attending meetup groups and making friends, aren't breaking the law, trying to be a net positive influence on the society in which I live.
Also looking for a place to stay, but the housing market is terrible and all shelters are full. Wanting to build myself a cabin in the woods but the government gets in the way.
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 3, 2023 20:46:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 2, 2023 14:21:25 ago (+0/-0)
a) ones consent to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality)...ignorance represents the hood, hence blinded by ignorance.
b) true vs false implies reasoning over suggested...a conflict shaped by ones consent.
c) true (wanting suggested) vs false (not wanting suggested) distracts from change (perceivable). Consenting to hold onto either side (by believing or disbelieving) tempts one to ignore change.
How do the few get away with lying? Suggesting denial and keep going. What does that work? Because denial takes way less effort than trying to prove a truth, which depletes the resistance of those trying rapidly.
Why are the truth-tellers burning out; while the liars celebrate one burned offering after another? Because motion (inception towards death) consumes heat (life).
[ + ] reptillian
[ - ] reptillian 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 5, 2023 01:56:45 ago (+0/-0)
So we are to counter lies with ignorance?
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 1 point 1.7 yearsSep 5, 2023 14:14:37 ago (+1/-0)
a) reasoning (truth vs lie) over suggested information (affixed definition) implies ones ignorance of perceivable (flowing inspiration). One needs to resist reason (truth vs lie) for implication (if change, then...). Reason tempts one to hold onto a side; while implication implies one to adapt as center (life) to surrounding (inception towards death).
b) Nature doesn't lie; nor does it brand any truth...it simply moves everything within forwards. Choosing to hold onto anything (information) while within motion (inspiration) tempts one to ignore latter for former.
Try this...apply implication (if/then) onto reason (truth vs lie). If life represents truth; then death represents lie. That implies that truth has a shelf-life before expiring, hence every truth changes into a lie.
c) counter (contrary to the right course) tempts one to ignore being (life) within only course (inception towards death). Others suggest contrarianism to tempt one to ignore that. If one consents (want or not want) to anything suggested; then ones mind will be stuck within the contrarianism of reason (want versus not want), hence always within conflict; no matter which side one chooses.