We let them do it by only using their money--us dollars. Use bitcoin/monero etc. and all this goes away. Stop using their shekels and e-shekels. Use open source, decentralized, capped supply cryptocurrencies as much as you can. Don't invest in it but USE it to buy, sell and trade.
Sure they can create more cryptos BUT those cryptos don't already have value like creating us dollars the way they do. Newly created cryptos have to compete in an open market to try to gain value.
Before any kikes or retards say jews control bitcoin, show us all how jews can create bitcoin out of thin air--they can't. They can influence markets but you can never take that away PLUS once they spend bitcoin, they can never create more to get it back. They have to compete with mining like everyone else.
Bitcoin is not perfect but it's far better at jew elimination than anything else so go ahead kikes and tell us we shouldn't use something that works. It's good to get a list of kikes here pretending to be whites.
Also, I can see retards and kikes telling us it doesn't work when the power goes out which isn't true. If you have generators and solar, it works just fine and is the first thing up because of cell towers BEFORE atms so cash isn't even as good in a modern world.
Hell, in truth, if you have lightning channels open with nearby people, you can fucking walk a transaction to someone or use opendime and spend it like cash. So fuck all your dumb ass retorts kikes. You just don't want us to win.
This is where @ImplicationOverReason would tell you that you use currency ie CURRENTSEA is the underlying issue.
It's hard to pinpoint him/it on a specific conclusion but I tend to agree the problem is a deeper mental human self inflicted dillemma ie- idolotry specifically the belief in money or more generally consent to third parties who otherwise have no business in a trade between 2 individuals.
If you 'remove the middleman' said middleman cannot control units (particularly if there are none) and you may therefore trade without compromising your authority to he who would otherwise seek to control/acquire/collect/manipulate units.
Sure, at $27k USD Bitcoin is a pretty good 'unit' these days if you had to use one - but it still represents third party idolotry in this case the third party is generally 'the network' and consensus algo and the miners and by extension the users and such.
That's a lot of parties involved just to get what you need ie- a cup of coffee and loaf of bread which is again where ImplicationOverReason kicks in to remind us that trading based on want (ie- greed) is hastening your inevitable path to death vs trading for what you need which is more in tune with how nature sustains & perpetuates itself (paraphrasing). Guess you should skip the coffee.
I used to 'believe' that Bitcoin was a great solution to the powers that be but it does nothing to address the deeper cancer that is the belief in units; for most using the system it's all magic anyway and thus they're trading literal fantasy units.
And I think this is at the core of so called Jewish power because they're literally instructed to manipulate senseless idolotors into a hastended death.
Imagine if all the 'brilliant' minds in the Bitcoin developer space rejected belief in digital fantasy & instead got together and started to build a farm. And not even a big farm - just something big enough to accommodate for them and their families ie- what they NEED. In the spirit of open source they could share their farm's processes & schematics with the world, including the technical innovations that address this problem or that along the way. Maybe even make a technically sound trading system that would allow farms ie- nodes to securely trade with one another across large distances in an efficent reliable way.
But no, what we have today is a massive circle jerk 97% white males all telling each other how their digital unit belief system is superior to the encumbant paper unit belief system.
All of their time & energy sucked up into this new system is no different than other large-scale scams like the oil industry which targeted the previous generation of military aged white males & technically inclined of that gen to go waste their time & energy in remote locations and needless smoke & mirror technical procedures. See a common pattern here?
use currency ie CURRENTSEA is the underlying issue
a) current (inception towards death) uses one (life)...others suggest currency (condition of flowing) to tempt one to hold onto a moving system instead of resisting it.
b) condition aka CON (together) DICERE (to speak) tempts one to ignore being apart within SOUND (whole).
him/it...ImplicationOverReason
"him vs her" implies reasoning. IT (any thing except male and female) contradicts being SEX, noun (Latin seco, to divide) - "distinction between male and female".
Reasoning tempts one "in-between" a conflict (imbalance), while male/female implies momentum (balance) for ones responding free will of choice.
Notice that "female" implies FE(minine)MALE, hence feminine aspect (momentum) of male (motion) for the trans-form within. Hence also WO(mb)MAN and S(plit)HE. Momentum represents the womb within motion for each off-spring within, and motion (whole) splits itself into momentum (partials). Oneself represents partial (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
How to discern all this stuff? Utilizing implication (if/then) within perceivable over reasoning (conflict) about suggested.
to pinpoint...a specific conclusion
Motion initiates (inception) specifies (life) and concludes (death)...oneself choosing to "pin-point" aka holding onto an affixed position implies ones ignorance of being within motion, hence ones lack of self discernment.
Being implies problem (living) within solution (process of dying)...others tempt one with suggested progressivism towards conclusion, which when consented to implies self dissolution.
I tend to agree the problem is...
Reasoning (agree vs disagree) over suggested tempts one to ignore being perceiving problem (life) within perceivable solution (inception towards death). That ain't tending (Latin tendo; to stretch) self; but self restriction through conflicts with others.
Consider if solution "was" perceivable; before anyone within can suggest what problem "is"?
a deeper mental dillemma
a) DILEMMA, noun - "a syllogism which strikes on each side; an assumption; to take"...being implies choice within balance (need/want); others suggest sides (want or not want) to tempt one into reasoning over sides (want versus not want); while ignoring ones position as choice within balance aka as center within surrounding.
Furthermore, choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) implies "taking" hold of suggested; while ignoring to let go of perceivable.
b) mind/memory represents momentum of motion for each one within. Consider want to hold onto (hard-drive) and need to let go (ram) of memory, while being within it. The more one chooses to hold onto (suggested information); the less memory can be utilized within ongoing (perceivable inspiration).
Nature doesn't need to be stored as information by those within; it represents a constant flow of always available inspiration to choose from, yet choice can only exist within balance (need/want) and so choice wields the power to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested).
idolatry
Suggested information (words) within perceivable inspiration (sound) represents idolatry. Want (holding onto) over need (letting go) represents idolatry.
specifically...or more generally
GEN-eration (inception towards death) SPECI-fies (life)...others suggest OR (a termination of Latin nouns, denotes an agent, as in actor, creditor) to distract one from being reaction (growth) within action (loss). The terminated NOUN (name; number; unit) represents ONE (Latin unus) -self...if one consents to suggested "or".
If the foundation of existence represents ENERGY (Greek; work) - "internal/inherent power", then what does "or" imply besides ones ignorance and lack of self discernment? Ask yourself...energy or what else?
consent to third parties who otherwise have no business in a trade between 2 individuals
Ones consent to suggested dualism (2) and collectivism (3) gives those suggesting it the power of ones consent aka willing submission to others while ignoring self (1).
Let's try the aforementioned again...if energy represents 1 (oneness; whole); then what represents 2? Explain dual-energy to me. Where would dual-energy be contained within?
Others suggest collectivism to tempt one to count..."would you like to count?" https://img.gvid.tv/i/2AaaXSGq.jpg Nature doesn't count; it designates units (partials) through internal differentiation of whole.
If you 'remove the middleman'
a) being implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable) aka MALCOLM (mael; servant; employment) in the middle (of work itself aka energy). Consenting to the mediated (Latin medius; middle) information suggested by others, tempts one to ignore ones position at the middle for submitting to another one...a chosen one.
If ENERGY (greek; work); then work (surrounding) will set you free (center). Work (motion) employs mind (momentum).
b) others suggest remove (dismiss; depart; away) to distract one from being RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by).
trade without
Being implies within, hence EX (expressed growth) CHANGE (impressing loss) aka trade.
a lot of parties
Each one unit (partial) within whole...others suggest LOT -"chance, hazard, fortune; that by which the fate or portion of one is determined" to distract one from self discernment as partial within whole.
consensus...
...contradicts each units free will of choice to consent to another.
more in tune with how nature sustains & perpetuates itself
Being implies tune (note; unit; visible sign; partial) within sound (whole) wielding the free will of choice within resonance (need) and dissonance (want) aka (need/want) balance aka momentum of motion.
a great solution to the powers that be
Solution (inception towards death) generates the power of being (life).
the belief in units
Being implies unit (one) among other units (ones) within whole (oneness). Ones consent (belief; faith; agreement etc.) to suggested THE-ism represents ones willing submission of self to another one.
The unit thing is a misunderstanding of the core problem that money solved. I'm not cutting my car in half to trade you for 5,000 chickens.
See you have to have units of currency to facilitate trade. It doesn't scale without it and is impractical.
As far as energy usage goes, it's just another climate change kike argument. Hell people use solar now for bitcoin and anything that's cheap. It's going to cost something to have a great system that can't be censored.
It can scale when you introduce other parties who can join the network to trade. Bitcoin is an elaborate settlement/cash system hybrid with concepts that could easily be adapted, simplified and implemented in a pure barter coinless system.
If you only have a trading network of 2 people yes your car for chickens trade gets complicated but that is not how a modern day barter system has to work. A big enough network would find a party who needs your car, another who needs my 5,000 chickens, and another who needed things that those other parties needed too which thus successfully executes a multi-trade.
And sure, stick the date in a distributed digital ledger; extra points give us a way to verify the quality/satisfaction of the products so the trading system can improve matchmaking for the next trades to come thereafter.
It will not work that's why it hasn't been implemented. It's a kike trick to have people pine for something else when something perfectly good is right there that WILL end their power.
Stop acting like a kike by trying to get everyone to wait. If it's so grand, build it. Meanwhile the rest of us whites will use Monero, etc.
The problem is the kikes you speak of will be using that stuff too; you cannot end their power by giving them a fast track to the head of the pack ie- Bitcoin/Monero et all can be purchased with fiat
Like running from the cops and calling the cops to have cops come to arrest the cops chasing you.
If we all use bitcoin, their power ends tomorrow. Stop using fiat and you give it no purchasing power. Once they spend bitcoin, it's gone and they have to work for more.
Your arguments are circular and only support the kike.
[ - ] I_am_baal 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 30, 2023 16:38:42 ago (+1/-0)
Good post, and I have it downloaded, organized, and archived. So if someone is looking for this in the future, and the article or video have disappeared, ping me.
[ + ] Name
[ - ] Name 1 point 1.7 yearsSep 2, 2023 18:28:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] rzr97
[ - ] rzr97 3 points 1.7 yearsAug 30, 2023 16:00:48 ago (+3/-0)*
Sure they can create more cryptos BUT those cryptos don't already have value like creating us dollars the way they do. Newly created cryptos have to compete in an open market to try to gain value.
Before any kikes or retards say jews control bitcoin, show us all how jews can create bitcoin out of thin air--they can't. They can influence markets but you can never take that away PLUS once they spend bitcoin, they can never create more to get it back. They have to compete with mining like everyone else.
Bitcoin is not perfect but it's far better at jew elimination than anything else so go ahead kikes and tell us we shouldn't use something that works. It's good to get a list of kikes here pretending to be whites.
Also, I can see retards and kikes telling us it doesn't work when the power goes out which isn't true. If you have generators and solar, it works just fine and is the first thing up because of cell towers BEFORE atms so cash isn't even as good in a modern world.
Hell, in truth, if you have lightning channels open with nearby people, you can fucking walk a transaction to someone or use opendime and spend it like cash. So fuck all your dumb ass retorts kikes. You just don't want us to win.
[ + ] reptillian
[ - ] reptillian 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 30, 2023 17:46:07 ago (+1/-0)
It's hard to pinpoint him/it on a specific conclusion but I tend to agree the problem is a deeper mental human self inflicted dillemma ie- idolotry specifically the belief in money or more generally consent to third parties who otherwise have no business in a trade between 2 individuals.
If you 'remove the middleman' said middleman cannot control units (particularly if there are none) and you may therefore trade without compromising your authority to he who would otherwise seek to control/acquire/collect/manipulate units.
Sure, at $27k USD Bitcoin is a pretty good 'unit' these days if you had to use one - but it still represents third party idolotry in this case the third party is generally 'the network' and consensus algo and the miners and by extension the users and such.
That's a lot of parties involved just to get what you need ie- a cup of coffee and loaf of bread which is again where ImplicationOverReason kicks in to remind us that trading based on want (ie- greed) is hastening your inevitable path to death vs trading for what you need which is more in tune with how nature sustains & perpetuates itself (paraphrasing). Guess you should skip the coffee.
I used to 'believe' that Bitcoin was a great solution to the powers that be but it does nothing to address the deeper cancer that is the belief in units; for most using the system it's all magic anyway and thus they're trading literal fantasy units.
And I think this is at the core of so called Jewish power because they're literally instructed to manipulate senseless idolotors into a hastended death.
Imagine if all the 'brilliant' minds in the Bitcoin developer space rejected belief in digital fantasy & instead got together and started to build a farm. And not even a big farm - just something big enough to accommodate for them and their families ie- what they NEED. In the spirit of open source they could share their farm's processes & schematics with the world, including the technical innovations that address this problem or that along the way. Maybe even make a technically sound trading system that would allow farms ie- nodes to securely trade with one another across large distances in an efficent reliable way.
But no, what we have today is a massive circle jerk 97% white males all telling each other how their digital unit belief system is superior to the encumbant paper unit belief system.
All of their time & energy sucked up into this new system is no different than other large-scale scams like the oil industry which targeted the previous generation of military aged white males & technically inclined of that gen to go waste their time & energy in remote locations and needless smoke & mirror technical procedures. See a common pattern here?
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 31, 2023 07:42:31 ago (+1/-0)
a) current (inception towards death) uses one (life)...others suggest currency (condition of flowing) to tempt one to hold onto a moving system instead of resisting it.
b) condition aka CON (together) DICERE (to speak) tempts one to ignore being apart within SOUND (whole).
"him vs her" implies reasoning. IT (any thing except male and female) contradicts being SEX, noun (Latin seco, to divide) - "distinction between male and female".
Reasoning tempts one "in-between" a conflict (imbalance), while male/female implies momentum (balance) for ones responding free will of choice.
Notice that "female" implies FE(minine)MALE, hence feminine aspect (momentum) of male (motion) for the trans-form within. Hence also WO(mb)MAN and S(plit)HE. Momentum represents the womb within motion for each off-spring within, and motion (whole) splits itself into momentum (partials). Oneself represents partial (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
How to discern all this stuff? Utilizing implication (if/then) within perceivable over reasoning (conflict) about suggested.
Motion initiates (inception) specifies (life) and concludes (death)...oneself choosing to "pin-point" aka holding onto an affixed position implies ones ignorance of being within motion, hence ones lack of self discernment.
Being implies problem (living) within solution (process of dying)...others tempt one with suggested progressivism towards conclusion, which when consented to implies self dissolution.
Reasoning (agree vs disagree) over suggested tempts one to ignore being perceiving problem (life) within perceivable solution (inception towards death). That ain't tending (Latin tendo; to stretch) self; but self restriction through conflicts with others.
Consider if solution "was" perceivable; before anyone within can suggest what problem "is"?
a) DILEMMA, noun - "a syllogism which strikes on each side; an assumption; to take"...being implies choice within balance (need/want); others suggest sides (want or not want) to tempt one into reasoning over sides (want versus not want); while ignoring ones position as choice within balance aka as center within surrounding.
Furthermore, choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) implies "taking" hold of suggested; while ignoring to let go of perceivable.
b) mind/memory represents momentum of motion for each one within. Consider want to hold onto (hard-drive) and need to let go (ram) of memory, while being within it. The more one chooses to hold onto (suggested information); the less memory can be utilized within ongoing (perceivable inspiration).
Nature doesn't need to be stored as information by those within; it represents a constant flow of always available inspiration to choose from, yet choice can only exist within balance (need/want) and so choice wields the power to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested).
Suggested information (words) within perceivable inspiration (sound) represents idolatry. Want (holding onto) over need (letting go) represents idolatry.
GEN-eration (inception towards death) SPECI-fies (life)...others suggest OR (a termination of Latin nouns, denotes an agent, as in actor, creditor) to distract one from being reaction (growth) within action (loss). The terminated NOUN (name; number; unit) represents ONE (Latin unus) -self...if one consents to suggested "or".
If the foundation of existence represents ENERGY (Greek; work) - "internal/inherent power", then what does "or" imply besides ones ignorance and lack of self discernment? Ask yourself...energy or what else?
Ones consent to suggested dualism (2) and collectivism (3) gives those suggesting it the power of ones consent aka willing submission to others while ignoring self (1).
Let's try the aforementioned again...if energy represents 1 (oneness; whole); then what represents 2? Explain dual-energy to me. Where would dual-energy be contained within?
Others suggest collectivism to tempt one to count..."would you like to count?" https://img.gvid.tv/i/2AaaXSGq.jpg
a) being implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable) aka MALCOLM (mael; servant; employment) in the middle (of work itself aka energy). Consenting to the mediated (Latin medius; middle) information suggested by others, tempts one to ignore ones position at the middle for submitting to another one...a chosen one.
If ENERGY (greek; work); then work (surrounding) will set you free (center). Work (motion) employs mind (momentum).
b) others suggest remove (dismiss; depart; away) to distract one from being RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by).
Being implies within, hence EX (expressed growth) CHANGE (impressing loss) aka trade.
Each one unit (partial) within whole...others suggest LOT -"chance, hazard, fortune; that by which the fate or portion of one is determined" to distract one from self discernment as partial within whole.
...contradicts each units free will of choice to consent to another.
Being implies tune (note; unit; visible sign; partial) within sound (whole) wielding the free will of choice within resonance (need) and dissonance (want) aka (need/want) balance aka momentum of motion.
Solution (inception towards death) generates the power of being (life).
Being implies unit (one) among other units (ones) within whole (oneness). Ones consent (belief; faith; agreement etc.) to suggested THE-ism represents ones willing submission of self to another one.
[ + ] rzr97
[ - ] rzr97 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 30, 2023 18:30:30 ago (+0/-0)
See you have to have units of currency to facilitate trade. It doesn't scale without it and is impractical.
As far as energy usage goes, it's just another climate change kike argument. Hell people use solar now for bitcoin and anything that's cheap. It's going to cost something to have a great system that can't be censored.
[ + ] reptillian
[ - ] reptillian 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 1, 2023 01:11:26 ago (+0/-0)
If you only have a trading network of 2 people yes your car for chickens trade gets complicated but that is not how a modern day barter system has to work. A big enough network would find a party who needs your car, another who needs my 5,000 chickens, and another who needed things that those other parties needed too which thus successfully executes a multi-trade.
And sure, stick the date in a distributed digital ledger; extra points give us a way to verify the quality/satisfaction of the products so the trading system can improve matchmaking for the next trades to come thereafter.
[ + ] rzr97
[ - ] rzr97 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 1, 2023 01:57:07 ago (+0/-0)
Stop acting like a kike by trying to get everyone to wait. If it's so grand, build it. Meanwhile the rest of us whites will use Monero, etc.
[ + ] reptillian
[ - ] reptillian 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 2, 2023 14:25:01 ago (+0/-0)
The problem is the kikes you speak of will be using that stuff too; you cannot end their power by giving them a fast track to the head of the pack ie- Bitcoin/Monero et all can be purchased with fiat
Like running from the cops and calling the cops to have cops come to arrest the cops chasing you.
[ + ] rzr97
[ - ] rzr97 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 2, 2023 18:13:50 ago (+0/-0)
Your arguments are circular and only support the kike.
[ + ] Fascinus
[ - ] Fascinus 3 points 1.7 yearsAug 30, 2023 12:43:36 ago (+3/-0)
https://files.catbox.moe/bfzoxk.mp4
https://pomf2.lain.la/f/rtwqh4ue.mp4
https://qu.ax/hsSn.mp4
[ + ] I_am_baal
[ - ] I_am_baal 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 30, 2023 16:38:42 ago (+1/-0)