[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 19:43:52 ago (+1/-0)
I'll prepare for the inevitable downvote-storm because of petulant children with no arguments.
Reminder: You can't explain the star trails over Australia.
Reminder: You went into flattard monkey shutdown mode when I explained why density is explained by gravity, and not the other way around:
"I'll explain it, but like all flattards, you'll have to reject any explanation that doesn't fit into your flattard world view. Why does a feather and a coin fall at different rates? Density, you say? But why do they at all? Oh, gravity. Proof: drop a feather and a coin in a vacuum. They fall at the same rate."
What was your response? You proved me right, and like an NPC, started repeating basic bitch flattard battle cries:
"You have still yet to find the curvature, buddy!"
It's pretty simple. We have a sphere of vision that will vanish at a single point due to perspective.
I explained why density is explained by gravity,
According to the heliocentric model, gravity is the bending of space time. When Einstein introduced to theory of relativity, it made newtonian's theory of gravity obsolete. You can't have both retard.
Why does a feather and a coin fall at different rates?
Because gravity is not the bending its spacetime and it's not a constant force. It differs based on how dense an objects matter. If it was a force acting upon the Earth, it would hold down a helium balloon because the rubber surrounding the gas.
But why do they at all?
You're trying to explain the phenomenon of a downward acceleration. You decided that the jew Einstein is right about it Even though they admit they have no idea how 97 % of the universe works under his model.
like an NPC, started repeating basic bitch flattard battle cries:
It's kinda a big deal. How are you going to pretend you're not a kike when anyone can verify there is no curvature?
Flattard keeps linking to site that 1) shits on him. and 2) is based on spherical Earth, and 3) uses ad hoc light bending without any physical basis.
When Einstein introduced to theory of relativity, it made newtonian's theory of gravity obsolete. You can't have both retard.
Flattard doesn't understand that Einstein's theories reduce to Newtonian mechanics at the scale of falling coins and feathers. Flattard doesn't understand that even if we go with Einstein, it still refutes the "density" argument.
Because gravity is not the bending its spacetime and it's not a constant force. It differs based on how dense an objects matter.
Then why do the feather and coin fall at the same rate in a vacuum, flattard? Notice how you just dodge that point, and instead want to talk about Einstein, or about how they fall in air.
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 21:44:35 ago (+1/-0)
shits on him
No. The guy that made the model assumed the distances. Regardless, the model shows a persons field of view and how it works. But you're too kiked to understand it. You only believe Nigger Degrasse Tyson.
is based on spherical Earth
Lol. No. It's says flat earth model with a done. Globes aren't accurate and should never be used for educational purposes.
Flattard doesn't understand that Einstein's theories reduce to Newtonian mechanics at the scale of falling coins and feathers.
Lol. That's the kike science I'm talking about. The current model can't explain it so you must invoke a special instance where the old model works to save the current model. What a kike.
Then why do the feather and coin fall at the same rate in a vacuum
Because there's a downward acceleration on Earth that would affect the objects. If you create a vacuum on Earth, it is still on Earth. The only way to test your theory is to travel to make believe outer space world with your experiment.
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 21:53:20 ago (+1/-0)
Regardless, the model shows a persons field of view and how it works. But you're too kiked to understand it.
"With the Flat Earth Dome Model I intended to show, that the geometric and physical aspects of celestial events and observations, in contrast to cyclic time events, can only be derived from the Heliocentric model."
You. Are. Retarded.
Lol. No. It's says flat earth model with a done. Globes aren't accurate and should never be used for educational purposes.
"It uses in the real world measured 3D Orbits, Constellations, Inclinations, Axial Tilts, Distances and Velocities, and the correct Sizes and Masses of Sun, Moon and Globe Earth to calculate all Observables, see Source Code: FE-Dome App. "
You. Are. Retarded.
The current model can't explain it so you must invoke a special instance where the old model works to save the current model.
They both explain it just fine. It doesn't matter if the force is spacetime curvature, or Newton's force model. None of it involves density, which is completely busted by the experiment of coins and feathers falling at the same rate in a vacuum.
Because there's a downward acceleration on Earth that would affect the objects.
That's GRAVITY, you absolute moron. And notice density doesn't matter AT ALL once you take air out of the equation. Density and buoyancy is explained by gravity, not the other way around.
With the assumption of distances. What don't you understand about that part? Flat Earthers don't agree with the distances but the concept of vision is correct.
Distances and Velocities, and the correct Sizes and Masses of Sun
Lol. Again, this part of it is all assumption. This is the part that is in question. Retard. Typical kike argument. Ignore the actual issue.
That's GRAVITY, you absolute moron.
Gravity is the bending of spacetime. You're claiming that the bending of spacetime is why objects are attracted to the Earth. I'm saying that you are a retard for thinking that space time is malleable.
chrimony coming in clutch with the 'what-aboutisms'.
Showing that you're a liar: "I'll prepare for the inevitable downvote-storm because of petulant children with no arguments."
Showing that when you're given arguments that you can't refute, you ignore them.
Prove me wrong, find the curvature!
Still no counter-argument. Thanks for proving me right again! And the curvature can be found in pictures/videos with enough altitude. But you deny them because you're a flattard, and follow the first rule of flattardism: Ignore all reason/evidence that shows the Earth is curved.
Showing that you're a liar: "I'll prepare for the inevitable downvote-storm because of petulant children with no arguments."
And I was immediately proven right by the downvote-storm that occured.
The amount you are wrong is absolutely hilarious.
Showing that when you're given arguments that you can't refute, you ignore them.
I address your pilpul and sophistry then you try to hide your failure to elucidate an argument by projecting.
Still no counter-argument.
And you still haven't found the curve. The burden of proof is on you ba'al' earthers to prove the curve, prove space, because to all of our senses, it is flat and motionless. You haven't and you can't because it's not there.
I want to mockingly tell you to "keep crying", but In reality I wish you would snap out of the liberal kike-programming that you've been indoctrinated with.
And I was immediately proven right by the downvote-storm that occured.
You lied about not receiving arguments. That you get downvotes is just you whining.
I address your pilpul and sophistry then you try to hide your failure to elucidate an argument by projecting.
Lying again. You asked for an argument, you were given it, and then you completely ignored it like the flattard you are.
And you still haven't found the curve.
There are thousands of pictures and videos that show the curve, flattard. You know this. Practically any rocket launch these days has a live video feed that shows the curve of the Earth. You're just repeating the flattard battle cry like an NPC, because you don't have a counter-argument.
I want to mockingly tell you to "keep crying", but In reality I wish you would snap out of the liberal kike-programming that you've been indoctrinated with.
Lulz. I base my beliefs on evidence and reason. You just follow the religion of Flattardism.
You lied about not receiving arguments. That you get downvotes is just you whining.
You have yet to provide one, only 'what-aboutisms', rote regurgitations of kiked-scientism and outright lies.
Lying again. You asked for an argument, you were given it, and then you completely ignored it like the flattard you are.
Yet you don't have an argument to show, only 'what-aboutisms', ad hominems and sophistry. Use your words and actually come up with an argument (note: you really can't because you don't understand your own beliefs, which is why you attack so vociferously).
There are thousands of pictures and videos that show the curve, flattard.
Again, you conflate CGI renderings with 'evidence' that is nowhere to be found in the real world.
I base my beliefs on evidence and reason. You just follow the religion of Flattardism.
Again, you simply believe the kike-scientism and call it 'reason' when you have done absolutely zero work to understand what it is you are even blindly espousing, while not thinking twice about why you have to resort to ad homs every other sentence. (That is generous, I think you do it more than that actually.)
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 17:33:35 ago (+3/-2)
They're not children with no arguments. To be in this corner of the web you'd have to already be aware of the jq aspect in every industry and institution. The fact that all the kikes pretending to be anti-semitic drop their script when it comes to flat earth and the kikes at NASa says it all. This is a designed echo chamber. They don't want you echoing about the flat earth.
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 19:53:01 ago (+1/-0)
Invoking kikes is the laziest argument on this site. It was Europeans that first proposed the Earth was round, and even calculated its size. You're just retarded monkeys that can't admit when you're wrong. Proof: The star trails that can be seen from Australia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56ZMZtq0qfY
Reminder that as an explanation for them, you linked to a site that shit on flattards, and the page clearly explained how the model used the standard heliocentric solar system and spherical Earth to get the right answers, and then mapped them in ad hoc, unnatural ways to Flattard Land: http://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=Flat+Earth+Dome+Model
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 20:47:09 ago (+1/-0)
Don't pretend like you know shit about it. Linking me kike sources just shows how retarded you are on the subject. As for your other "proof," they're fuckin retarded. All of it's been addressed. The only way you can continue strawmaning the argument is if you're retarded enough to believe "the flat earth society" is genuine or you look up dumb jews like projector Dave.
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 21:20:40 ago (+1/-0)
Linking me kike sources just shows how retarded you are on the subject.
Flattard calls everything that shows he's retarded a "kike" source.
As for your other "proof," they're fuckin retarded. All of it's been addressed.
"Reminder that as an explanation for them, you linked to a site that shit on flattards, and the page clearly explained how the model used the standard heliocentric solar system and spherical Earth to get the right answers, and then mapped them in ad hoc, unnatural ways to Flattard Land"
You haven't refuted this, because it's 100% true. Come up with a working flattard model that isn't based on the spherical model, and based on physical law.
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 29, 2023 04:13:37 ago (+1/-0)
What's a "kike source", flattard? YouTube? Because you've linked to them too. Or is it like I said: Flattard calls everything that shows he's retarded a "kike" source.
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 29, 2023 10:24:24 ago (+1/-0)
Kike science. Relativity is kike science.
Notice you're the only 'tard here talking about relativity. I base all my arguments on Newtonian mechanics, invented by a European, and easily demonstrated by table top experiments that even 'tards like you could carry out.
Flattard Earth is a Hebrew faith position. Ancient European scholars figured out the Earth was round and calculated its size. You're the kike here, not me.
I said learn what a hostile whiteness is.
I know what it is, and you link to non-hostile flattard videos on YouTube. Learn what a hypocrite is, flattard.
[ + ] MoronSaint
[ - ] MoronSaint 0 points 8 monthsAug 30, 2023 03:48:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 19:43:52 ago (+1/-0)
Reminder: You can't explain the star trails over Australia.
Reminder: You went into flattard monkey shutdown mode when I explained why density is explained by gravity, and not the other way around:
"I'll explain it, but like all flattards, you'll have to reject any explanation that doesn't fit into your flattard world view. Why does a feather and a coin fall at different rates? Density, you say? But why do they at all? Oh, gravity. Proof: drop a feather and a coin in a vacuum. They fall at the same rate."
What was your response? You proved me right, and like an NPC, started repeating basic bitch flattard battle cries:
"You have still yet to find the curvature, buddy!"
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 20:56:34 ago (+1/-0)
http://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=Flat+Earth+Dome+Model&state=--635-21.6-184.298121-189.9-2355.9583-30-91-21-2
It's pretty simple. We have a sphere of vision that will vanish at a single point due to perspective.
According to the heliocentric model, gravity is the bending of space time. When Einstein introduced to theory of relativity, it made newtonian's theory of gravity obsolete. You can't have both retard.
Because gravity is not the bending its spacetime and it's not a constant force. It differs based on how dense an objects matter. If it was a force acting upon the Earth, it would hold down a helium balloon because the rubber surrounding the gas.
You're trying to explain the phenomenon of a downward acceleration. You decided that the jew Einstein is right about it Even though they admit they have no idea how 97 % of the universe works under his model.
It's kinda a big deal. How are you going to pretend you're not a kike when anyone can verify there is no curvature?
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 21:27:01 ago (+1/-0)
Flattard keeps linking to site that 1) shits on him. and 2) is based on spherical Earth, and 3) uses ad hoc light bending without any physical basis.
Flattard doesn't understand that Einstein's theories reduce to Newtonian mechanics at the scale of falling coins and feathers. Flattard doesn't understand that even if we go with Einstein, it still refutes the "density" argument.
Then why do the feather and coin fall at the same rate in a vacuum, flattard? Notice how you just dodge that point, and instead want to talk about Einstein, or about how they fall in air.
Flattards gonna flattard.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 21:44:35 ago (+1/-0)
No. The guy that made the model assumed the distances. Regardless, the model shows a persons field of view and how it works. But you're too kiked to understand it. You only believe Nigger Degrasse Tyson.
Lol. No. It's says flat earth model with a done. Globes aren't accurate and should never be used for educational purposes.
Lol. That's the kike science I'm talking about. The current model can't explain it so you must invoke a special instance where the old model works to save the current model. What a kike.
Because there's a downward acceleration on Earth that would affect the objects. If you create a vacuum on Earth, it is still on Earth. The only way to test your theory is to travel to make believe outer space world with your experiment.
Nobody dodged a point. You're just a whiny jew.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 21:53:20 ago (+1/-0)
"With the Flat Earth Dome Model I intended to show, that the geometric and physical aspects of celestial events and observations, in contrast to cyclic time events, can only be derived from the Heliocentric model."
You.
Are.
Retarded.
"It uses in the real world measured 3D Orbits, Constellations, Inclinations, Axial Tilts, Distances and Velocities, and the correct Sizes and Masses of Sun, Moon and Globe Earth to calculate all Observables, see Source Code: FE-Dome App. "
You.
Are.
Retarded.
They both explain it just fine. It doesn't matter if the force is spacetime curvature, or Newton's force model. None of it involves density, which is completely busted by the experiment of coins and feathers falling at the same rate in a vacuum.
That's GRAVITY, you absolute moron. And notice density doesn't matter AT ALL once you take air out of the equation. Density and buoyancy is explained by gravity, not the other way around.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 22:44:09 ago (+0/-0)
With the assumption of distances. What don't you understand about that part? Flat Earthers don't agree with the distances but the concept of vision is correct.
Lol. Again, this part of it is all assumption. This is the part that is in question. Retard. Typical kike argument. Ignore the actual issue.
Gravity is the bending of spacetime. You're claiming that the bending of spacetime is why objects are attracted to the Earth. I'm saying that you are a retard for thinking that space time is malleable.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 [op] -1 points 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 19:46:59 ago (+1/-2)
Thanks for dropping in and letting us know you're still really confused and don't know your own 'ball earth model', bud!
I like your 'inb4' about the curvature too. Because we all know you cannot find it, because it doesn't exist.
Prove me wrong, find the curvature!
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 2 points 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 19:56:34 ago (+2/-0)
Showing that you're a liar: "I'll prepare for the inevitable downvote-storm because of petulant children with no arguments."
Showing that when you're given arguments that you can't refute, you ignore them.
Still no counter-argument. Thanks for proving me right again! And the curvature can be found in pictures/videos with enough altitude. But you deny them because you're a flattard, and follow the first rule of flattardism: Ignore all reason/evidence that shows the Earth is curved.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 [op] 0 points 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 20:05:49 ago (+1/-1)
And I was immediately proven right by the downvote-storm that occured.
The amount you are wrong is absolutely hilarious.
I address your pilpul and sophistry then you try to hide your failure to elucidate an argument by projecting.
And you still haven't found the curve. The burden of proof is on you ba'al' earthers to prove the curve, prove space, because to all of our senses, it is flat and motionless. You haven't and you can't because it's not there.
I want to mockingly tell you to "keep crying", but In reality I wish you would snap out of the liberal kike-programming that you've been indoctrinated with.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 2 points 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 21:44:02 ago (+2/-0)
You lied about not receiving arguments. That you get downvotes is just you whining.
Lying again. You asked for an argument, you were given it, and then you completely ignored it like the flattard you are.
There are thousands of pictures and videos that show the curve, flattard. You know this. Practically any rocket launch these days has a live video feed that shows the curve of the Earth. You're just repeating the flattard battle cry like an NPC, because you don't have a counter-argument.
Lulz. I base my beliefs on evidence and reason. You just follow the religion of Flattardism.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 [op] 0 points 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 21:53:37 ago (+1/-1)
You have yet to provide one, only 'what-aboutisms', rote regurgitations of kiked-scientism and outright lies.
Yet you don't have an argument to show, only 'what-aboutisms', ad hominems and sophistry. Use your words and actually come up with an argument (note: you really can't because you don't understand your own beliefs, which is why you attack so vociferously).
Again, you conflate CGI renderings with 'evidence' that is nowhere to be found in the real world.
Again, you simply believe the kike-scientism and call it 'reason' when you have done absolutely zero work to understand what it is you are even blindly espousing, while not thinking twice about why you have to resort to ad homs every other sentence. (That is generous, I think you do it more than that actually.)
Take a breath maybe. You're getting worked up.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 2 points 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 21:56:57 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 [op] 0 points 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 21:58:08 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] MoronSaint
[ - ] MoronSaint -1 points 8 monthsAug 30, 2023 03:50:35 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 30, 2023 05:25:53 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] BushChuck
[ - ] BushChuck 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 18:20:01 ago (+2/-1)
Exploration is something the "olde timers" did.
Best we can do is tax slavery, poison food, and goy slop religions.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 17:33:35 ago (+3/-2)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 19:53:01 ago (+1/-0)
Reminder that as an explanation for them, you linked to a site that shit on flattards, and the page clearly explained how the model used the standard heliocentric solar system and spherical Earth to get the right answers, and then mapped them in ad hoc, unnatural ways to Flattard Land: http://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=Flat+Earth+Dome+Model
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 20:47:09 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 21:20:40 ago (+1/-0)
Flattard calls everything that shows he's retarded a "kike" source.
"Reminder that as an explanation for them, you linked to a site that shit on flattards, and the page clearly explained how the model used the standard heliocentric solar system and spherical Earth to get the right answers, and then mapped them in ad hoc, unnatural ways to Flattard Land"
You haven't refuted this, because it's 100% true. Come up with a working flattard model that isn't based on the spherical model, and based on physical law.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 22:57:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 29, 2023 04:13:37 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 8 monthsAug 29, 2023 08:37:28 ago (+0/-0)
If you have to ask you are obviously a retard.
Learn what a hostile whiteness is retard. You have a jew religion. I can use your priests to show that you don't even understand your own religion.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 29, 2023 09:01:12 ago (+1/-0)
Meaning you don't want to say, because you know you're just a hypocrite that links to YouTube too.
No, anybody can posts vids to YouTube, flattard. Which is why you link to flattard vids on YouTube. That's not a "hostile witness", hypocrite.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 8 monthsAug 29, 2023 10:14:44 ago (+0/-0)
Kike science. Relativity is kike science. Anything relying on relativity to work is a product of kike science.
I said learn what a hostile whiteness is.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 8 monthsAug 29, 2023 10:24:24 ago (+1/-0)
Notice you're the only 'tard here talking about relativity. I base all my arguments on Newtonian mechanics, invented by a European, and easily demonstrated by table top experiments that even 'tards like you could carry out.
Flattard Earth is a Hebrew faith position. Ancient European scholars figured out the Earth was round and calculated its size. You're the kike here, not me.
I know what it is, and you link to non-hostile flattard videos on YouTube. Learn what a hypocrite is, flattard.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus -3 points 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 17:51:44 ago (+1/-4)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 20:58:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 [op] -1 points 8 monthsAug 28, 2023 18:30:10 ago (+0/-1)