Sign into an existing account

Thanks, doctor! What an incredible observation. Now we know, and knowing is half the battle. Praise jebus

They did a study which correlated deaths and adverse side effects to batch numbers. Of course it showed that some batches had 100x the adverse events than others. This was not intentional imo, but predictable.

You had hundreds or thousands of small pharma manufacturers contracted to produce this shit and it was a brand new technology being implemented by people who had no experience with the manufacturing processes. When your quality levels must be very high, it takes time and training to implement a new process. What happened was that in early production, there were a high number of bad batches produced. That number eventually went down. These small pharma contractors must have known they were assing things up.

Also as @inward mentioned, logistical failures may have lead to many shipments of vax degrading due to storage temperatures.

There is also variability in the way the vax is injected into recipients. Someone who got vaxed in a vein might have more adverse reactions because of systemic distribution throughout the body.

There are lots of reasons why some had mild or no reactions while others dropped dead. I wouldn’t assume that most people who stayed healthy got a placebo, at least intentionally.

I used to work in quality and we analyzed all kinds of variable factors which affect the consistency of the process and the product. These guys are not stamping out widgets.

Additionally it seems that there is some cumulative damage incurred by people who get multiple jabs even though any one jab might not be enough to kill most indiviuals if produced correctly.

Basically, what we have seen in terms of variable responses is exactly what I would expect to see with inconsistent quality levels at multiple steps in the manufacturing and supply chains. It was a rush job to make shekels.

And of course the effectiveness was crap, which a bunch of vaccinologist were saying would happen because ofthe ADE issue. But if that was the biggest problem, it would have been just robbery and not mass murder. There’s no way the pharma fags didn’t know the product was not ready.

I just don’t see this as a mass conspiracy to kill some people and spare others. It’s just reckless naked greed run amok. Situation-normal-all-fucked-up kind of problems.

The conditions to make the vax viable weren't followed properly a lot. The second it hit room temp it was basically mush you injected.

Geographic deployment to shift voting lines. How useful would it be to shift new york and now your guy has control over NYPD? You could do a lot with that.

0biden whisper

It was a test to see if you'd actually comply.

Now that they know you will get ready for round 2.

In Australia, Pfizer employees were given a "special" batch imported for their exclusive use. This is all you need to know. Logically their can only be 2 conclusions. The first being they were given saline and they knew the Vax was deadly. The second being they were given a Vax that was made to a higher standard, and the one given to the general public was unsafe and deadly.

If they weren’t kept at six million degrees below zero, or whatever it was, the may have been ineffective. Like shots obtained in parking lots at schools or at shitty drug stores, compared to in a doctors office or hospital setting. If all the shots had been cared for correctly, all you faggots would be dead from the jabs.

Duh. I was saying this from the beginning.

That and some of them just don't work. Biology is a tricky subject because it's always changing and evolving to stimulus. As a result,a biological agent might kill a lot of people but nothing is guaranteed to kill everyone. Hence the need for "boosters".

There's more options than just inert/placebo, including things designed to slowly destroy your health without killing you too quickly, or to modify you to prepare you for the next phase of their plan.

They needed to get info about them indirectly, I'm assuming they sent specific percentages of real/inert to specific regions and will collect the data of how many die in a certain area that way

So 15% to city X, do we see up to 15% dead in city X?

9% to city Y, what's the reported percentage of deaths there?

Funny enough, that's Alex Jones' theory too. I honestly think that they were all bad, but that some batches had a higher amount of some of the more dangerous ingredients.

You guys see everything in black and white.

Smoking for example doesn't kill everyone. An in law of mine smoked 2 packs a day and lived until 95. Another relative of mine was an alcoholic for 60 years and lived until 91.

The Vax will significantly increase your chances of myocondartis.

Will everyone who takes it drop dead instantly? No. But enough did that it would be stupid to take that shit.


"Yours came from?" Did you get vaxxed?

of course ... that's why none of my family members living in liberal hellholes got injured

I think a lot of them were saline. Especially in round 1. Some people who got vaxxed told me they heard the nurse say "oh...the computer says you get this one..." and the nurse picks up phone and another batch would be brought out. They know who got what and decided who got what.

They did a study, I think it was in Denmark, on vaccine batches and number of adverse events per batch size.

The result where very clear. There were batches with low numbers of doses which were EXTREMELY toxic. Then on the other end of the scale there were large batches with NO adverse events.

Conclusion: a major part of the batches were harmless saline, and then there were small batches of extremely dangerous kill shots.

I'm fairly sure that incompetence saved a lot of people. The vaxx needs to be kept extremely cold or it breaks down quickly. It seemed a lot of mass vaxx locations were just getting it ready and would let it sit around and decay. I would like to believe people let it go bad on purpose but that's just the idealist in me.

I think we know there are/were different versions of the shot. Pretty sure it was confirmed that Pfizer employees got a different version. And people have found out that certain lots were more immediately deadly than others.

The real question is: Is the differences in the jabs due to incompetence or is it planned?