Sign into an existing account

If you took the time to read the book, you would realise that they were practicing circumcision before they ended up in Egypt.

And then to say something like X predates Y history book, essentially is stating the obvious for any story told in the past tense.

Stop trying to sound smart.

It may have been a mark of supremacy as well. Reference the Hyksos (read Canaanites) who dominated ancient Egypt for a time, between the middle and new kingdoms. The Jews were not slaves, they were invaders who were cast out of Egypt. Think about it this so consistent with every other Jewish fable.

jews were never slaves in Egypt https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-biblical-exodus-story-is-fiction_b_1408123

circumcision lowers the sensitivity of the penis by 60%, so sex is basically 60% less enjoyable

that's why they want you to circumcise...they do it because if they don't they get constant UTI's which will leave their ethnic group infertile

it's not that they want to circumsize...they have to, and when you insult them for it they screech and vetch so loud lmfao

try it out sometime (teasing them not clipping your dick)

Uhh they couldn’t come up with something more obvious for identification? Like ear piercing or forehead tattoo?
They identified using dicks! Homos

Who are you! LEMME SEE UR DIK!

Retarded

So I guess there were jewish slaves in Egypt. I've heard some others claim otherwise.

Im skeptical. Lots of tribes all over the world practive body modification as a rite of passage. In Australia some abos split their dicks. It shows commitment to the tribe.

Jews were never enslaved in Egypt. They didn't build the pyramids.

Phoenician soldiers and Hittite soldiers could have been though.

Bias up front: am Christian, anti-circumcision, un-cut because my father's was botched(skin bridge)

The Bible says God told Abraham to circumcise the men and boys of his house to set them apart from others, the goal was a mark of identification of tribal belonging.

Modern total circumcision does not resemble historical circumcision much at all, the modern process comes from assmad rabbis living in greece during roman times butthurt about jews going native because the circumcision was generally so minimal that from 6 feet away in a bath house you probably couldn't tell they were even cut. So they figured out total circumcision to set themselves further apart. The old practice seems to have just been to take a bit off the top, that practice probably prevented phimosis and made the tip of the glans a bit less sensitive due to keratinization but kept intact the ridge and pocket function of the meatus and foreskin that worked as a lubrication and pleasure mechanism in sex but would have also made masturbation a bit more difficult due to precum not being collected and retained by the foreskin.

John Kellogg learned circumcision from the jews who still practiced total circumcision because this practice made kikes almost incapable of masturbation for over a thousand years and fucked up their sex lives, it's no wonder they got so neurotic, and when it spread to be standard practice in america they changed the way they(jews) cut again, now they use a "v" shaped notch to cut out just a tiny bit of skin, it marks them and probably still prevents phimosis in most cases but shouldn't make masturbating hard anymore, especially with modern lubricants to hand.

It is unlikely in Abraham's passage through egypt that he saw anyone punished by circumcision and jews were not captive in israel for another 100-200 years.

Total(modern) Circumcision does reduce sensitivity, firstly the foreskin itself has roughly as many nerve endings as the skin on the back of the hands and fingers and those nerve endings are tied into arousal and the recovery rate after ejaculation. A circumcised man on average needs about 30 minutes to go for round two after ejaculating an uncircumcised man needs 2-10 minutes to the point some don't actually need to stop at all though they will be pushing firm rope for a few minutes.

The second way circumcision reduces sensitivity is by keratinization of the glans, the actual tip of the penis requires its sensitive nerves be kept sheltered in a humid environment, the foreskin does that normally but without it the glans develops a harder keratin covering like normal skin and thus the nerves have reduced sensitivity

The foreskin moves during sex spreading lubrication which reduces chance of injury, chaffing, rash, painful sex and spread of STDs but also stimulates the vagina and can be used to postpone male orgasm on a pull stroke.

1 in 10 birth circumcisions in hospital is botched often leading to painful sex and I suspect genital fixation could result in transgender ideation. The most common botching leads to an irregular bend in the penis the worst botching of these possible common ones is the skin bridge, in which painful scar tissue bridges between the glans and shaft.

Don't cut your sons, circumcision is down over 50% in America's youngest generation but hospitals will still do it by default.

So what you're saying is that they subverted the meaning of the symbol?