☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
6

Simple math that flat earthers don't understand. Copy this into a file so you can slap a kike's face with it later.

submitted by I_am_baal to whatever 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 07:04:04 ago (+11/-5)     (whatever)

Here's some math on how to work out the required observation height to observe a given distance on a spherical surface or the distance to the horizon from a given observation height.

First, let's define a right triangle. r^2 + d^2 = (h + r)^2 where r is the radius of the Earth and d is the distance in a straight line from ground level extending tangentially to the surface of the earth (or what a flat-tard may call level from that perspective). h is the height above the ground that connects to the d line, the height that we're observing from in this case. Visually, this is what it looks like:

https://files.catbox.moe/lrri6o.png

Let's say we have our observation height (h) and of course the radius of the earth (r), and we want to find d, the distance to the horizon. When we re-arrange the equation, we come up with this:

d = sqrt((radius of the earth in meters + 10000 meters)^2 - (radius of the earth in meters)^2) where the radius of the earth is (averaged out to) 6.371009×10^6 meters. That places the horizon at 357,100 meters at an observation height of 10,000 meters.

357,100 meters or 221.89 miles

Earth isn't a perfect sphere. So, accuracy will vary.

A lot of flat earth niggers like to claim that globe earth people think that the horizon drops by 8 inches per mile squared, math that I would expect from niggers if they could do anything resembling math. The observation deck would be have to be 881,260.88 inches or 22,384 meters high in order to be just at the horizon. It's 10,000 meters in reality.

For a visual representation, the nigger math would create a retarded parabola. Spheres don't look like this retarded parabola when viewed from the side.

Here's the retarded parabola for reference: https://files.catbox.moe/dqicp5.jpg

This isn't an invite to debate flat earthers, as that's part of the psyop's goal, to waste your time and energy and to cause a brain drain from targeted forums by chasing away the people that can't stand such stupidity. They're retarded bioweapons designed to be irritating and to disrupt information networks. I can't stop any of them from making a fool of themselves in the comments though.


72 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 07:11:59 ago (+2/-2)

simple math

Addition (inception); Subtraction (death); Multiplication (intercourse for off-spring); Division (being partial within whole).

The above is based on perceivable UNIT (Latin unus; one)...others suggest MATH, noun - "a mowing; as in aftermath" ( https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/math ) to distract ONE from self by using zero as the foundation, while tempting ones to count each other as NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit".

[ - ] reptillian 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 29, 2023 11:55:23 ago (+0/-0)

So... do you have a better proposal for counting and organizing perceivable units? If someone is offering you chickens for example you may need to perform multiplication to figure out the number of eggs you may yield and then subtraction to account for the loss of potatoes you need to exchange apart of the trade.

Like, should we just follow the same rules for MATH but de-satanize it by removing use of zero?

Might be interesting. ChatGPT says the Mayans had a system based on power of 20 & symbols that did not use zeroes.

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 29, 2023 13:19:38 ago (+0/-0)

do you have a better proposal for counting and organizing perceivable units?

a) being division, while sustaining self as addition within subtraction through multiplication.

b) oneself represents best (evaluation) nature (value) has to offer...choosing to ignore offer (perceivable) for proposals (suggestion) shapes it into the worst nature has to offer.

c) unit implies partial (ones) within whole (oneness). The more one discerns self, the more one comprehends about whole and partials. Agreeing vs disagreeing with others tempts one to ignore self discernment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant represents partials suggesting other partials about perceivable whole. The trick...suggesting one the picture or story of that parable tempts one to consent to the suggestion, hence viewing all six blind men (partials) and the elephant (whole) together without ever discerning self as partial (perception) within whole (perceivable).

Others utilize suggested collectivism (pictures; stories etc.) to distract one (partial) from discerning self, and ones consent keeps suggested collectivism together. Wanting something tempts one to hold onto it within ones mind/memory. This allows others to collect everything one consent to uphold within ones mind/memory aka bank (hold onto) by trust (consent). Suggestion represents the bank-teller, hence telling tales for one to bank.

d) organization implies -TION (action) and the organs (reactions) within aka instruments (minds instructed) within sound (entire).

e) one doesn't need to count units (ones); nor organize units (partials within whole)...one needs to resist the want to count (collectivism) and organize (progressivism); otherwise others will count (name; number; statistic etc.) and organize (chain of command; uniformity; society etc.) one to the detriment of self.

If someone is offering...

...then one ignored offer (perceivable reality) for proposal (suggested fiction). What could a partial propose that a whole doesn't already offer each partial within?

to figure out the number

a) FIG'URE, noun (Latin figura,figo) - "form of any thing as expressed by the outline"...impressing outline (inception towards death) generates expressing inline (life) aka flow to form. Being implies "figure within"...others suggest one to figure out.

b) NUMBER (designation of a unit) implies UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one)...one (unit) trying to figure out one (number) contradicts self. Ask those around you if they ever raised chickens to get an estimate about how self-contradiction is working out...

you need to exchange

Change (inception towards death aka loss) represents need for (forwards) ex-pression (life aka growth)...wanting to ignore that represents self-repression.

apart of the trade

Apart reactions (growth) trading within whole action (loss) for sustenance. If reactions (growth) trade with other reactions (growth); then a) one ignores wholesale (perceivable) for retail (suggested); which b) allows a few to accumulate collected growth of a many, who're giving it away for free (will of choice).

The foundation of trade represents resisting each other by choice until a balance is found about how much resistance each one is willing to spend. If one goes into a trade based on wanting suggested; then one consents to gamble resistance within temptation. If one goes into a trade based one needing perceivable (thirst; hunger; shelter); then one can resist others tempting one with wanting suggested (cola; chicken-wings; airbnb).

should we just follow the same

a) same (inception towards death) inspires differences (life) with the need to resist the temptation of wanting to follow.

b) suggested progressivism (should) tempts one to ignore being (life) progressed (inception towards death), which implies a "must" (resistance), which "should" tempts one to ignore.

c) suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving apartheid (one) within perceivable wholeness (oneness) to ignore self for others, hence then falling for collectivism (counting).

removing use of zero?

a) instead of removing suggested zero (nothing); try RE (responding to) MOVE (being moved by) oneness (everything).

b) having choice implies re-using balance (momentum), while being used by motion as growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).

for MATH

If one (life) ignores for-wards (inception towards death), then there will be an aftermath for ones ignorance...you can count on that.

based on power of 20 & symbols that did not use zeroes

20 aka suggested dualism (2) and nihilism (0).

CHAT-GPT aka generative pre-trained transformer.

a) ones consent pre-trains one to suggestions by others; while ignoring to be trans-form (life) within generation (inception towards death).

b) CHAT, verb - "to talk without form or ceremony" + CEREMONY (outward rite)...a distraction from being (life) within outward rite of passage (inception towards death).

[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 08:00:20 ago (+6/-6)

The retard huffing his own farts while jerking off to the idea he's figured it all out.

This is the worst form of mental masturbation.

"Science isn't up for debate it's settled"

The complete antithesis of Science

[ - ] Inward 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 09:51:33 ago (+2/-0)

In what way is math a debatable science?

[ - ] FacelessOne 4 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 09:58:22 ago (+5/-1)

Like statistics, liars often find math to be the greatest tool for deceptions.

If math was perfect we would have a unified theory.

We do not have a unified theory.

[ - ] McNasty 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 13:01:17 ago (+2/-0)

I'm told the Holocaust happened. The science is settled. There's no debate about. It totally happened.

[ - ] Inward 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 21:39:40 ago (+0/-0)

The holocaust isn't math, though the math related to the holocaust makes it factually fake.

[ - ] McNasty 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 14, 2023 11:22:53 ago (+0/-0)

What do you mean it's not math? If 3 million jews were gassed and then 3 million more were gassed, that's 6 million gassed jews. Are you saying that isn't math?

[ - ] Inward 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 15, 2023 13:31:26 ago (+0/-0)

I'm talking ovens and census numbers.

[ - ] Inward 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 21:42:35 ago (+0/-0)

The holocaust isn't math, though the math related to the holocaust makes it factually fake.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 11:53:09 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] usedoilanalysis -1 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 15:05:01 ago (+0/-1)

Math gives you an approximation of reality.

[ - ] Inward 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 21:38:51 ago (+0/-0)

And that makes it debatable? No.

[ - ] usedoilanalysis -1 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 22:07:17 ago (+0/-1)

You can debate anything.

[ - ] Inward 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 15, 2023 13:32:07 ago (+0/-0)

That's the statement of an imbecile.

[ - ] usedoilanalysis -1 points 1.7 yearsAug 15, 2023 14:36:39 ago (+0/-1)

Says the imbecile with no skills of debate.

[ - ] usedoilanalysis -1 points 1.7 yearsAug 15, 2023 14:36:43 ago (+0/-1)

Says the imbecile with no skills of debate.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 09:47:38 ago (+1/-1)

Let's debate 2+2. I say it equals 4. What position will you be taking? Or, is this settled?

[ - ] FacelessOne 4 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 09:50:55 ago (+4/-0)

1+1+1+1=4

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 10:00:48 ago (+0/-0)

So, change the goalpost?

I said let's debate 2+2, not where 4 came from.

[ - ] FacelessOne 3 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 10:09:27 ago (+3/-0)

I reject your premise, 4=2+1+1

[ - ] oyveyo 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 10:38:00 ago (+2/-0)

10 A=SQR(16)
20 PRINT A
30 GOTO 20
RUN

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 11:54:32 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] oyveyo 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 18:23:27 ago (+0/-0)*

Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is insane. Repeating a known thing over and over is hammerdrilling.

In other words, the calculation has already been made, and the result will never change, so re-calculating it would be pointless and a waste of CPU resources in most cases (in some cases wasting resources is desired, such as a for/next loop for time delay). The desired effect of the program is to repeatedly say "4", which it does without having to recalculate the value. The program could be condensed into one line like this: 10 PRINT SQR(16):GOTO 10 and that have the same output but be more inefficient (in terms of processor expenditure). But for even more 4's in your face, just add a ";" after the print which will omit the CR/LF suffix the interpreter usually adds for you... which makes each print append to the previous one, resulting in an entire screen full of 4's as opposed to just a single 4 on each line. And if you really want to get fancy use a "," instead to quantify the outputs into vertical rows.

repeating PRINT SQR(16) produces this:
4
4
4
...
PRINT SQR(16); does this:
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
...
and PRINT SQR(16), does this:
4_________4_________4________4_______4
4_________4_________4________4_______4
4_________4_________4________4_______4
...
(I used _ for space because the stupid internet doesn't like me superfluously putting spaces together)
(and yes, I know how to use a different ASCII character to achieve the right spacing without any visual artifacting, but it's Sunday I can't be bothered to look at unicode tables on Sundays.)

[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 14, 2023 10:25:18 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] oyveyo 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 15, 2023 12:31:16 ago (+1/-0)*

OG grey tv-TRS-80, CoCo I, II or III? I'm a CoCo II man myself (with the OS9 floppy expansion). I also had a TRS-80 Model III boulder with the double 5.25" floppy bays. When that model III died, I disected it to see what made it tick... man I remember thinking to myself "Jesus that took some balls to cram all those old components into that case!"
Continue thread

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 13:44:15 ago (+1/-1)

You keep trying to deflect from the topic, 2+2, and turning it into a discussion about the derivation of 4. You jewish?

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 13:49:24 ago (+2/-1)

You have 2 dicks in your butt. If you add 2 more, you'll have 4 dicks in your butt. Since 2+2=4, it's undisputable that you have 4 dicks in your butt. If you don't have 4 dicks in your butt, please explain. Because 2+2=4 and there is no argument about it.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 18, 2023 02:27:17 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 18:59:02 ago (+0/-0)

Boomer is trying to tell me 1+3≠4

[ - ] McNasty 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 13:38:36 ago (+0/-0)

Depends. Sure, 2+2=4 but it also depends what you're trying to add up. If you told me 2 good jews + 2 more good jews = 4 good jews, I would say that's false because there is no such thing as a good jew. I'm not arguing the math. I'm arguing the relationship between math and reality.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 13:46:26 ago (+1/-0)

If there is no such thing as a good jew, you certainly couldn't have 4 jews. But what I was "trying to add up" was 2 and 2. Adding descriptors changes the issue.

[ - ] McNasty 3 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 13:51:16 ago (+3/-0)

Math is an expression. I can describe fantasies with math. You can't say that the Holocaust happened because 3 million jews plus 3 million more jews equals 6 million jews. I'll debate you all day on where you came up with these numbers.

[ - ] big_fat_dangus 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 09:09:16 ago (+5/-4)

Bully flat tards every single day

[ - ] McNasty 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 12:57:27 ago (+3/-1)

Claiming that the earth has curvature at 8 inches per mile squared is like claiming six million jews died in a Holocaust. Reality contradicts the math. Only kikes suck NASA dick faggot.

[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 12:58:59 ago (+2/-2)

Brainlets seething 😏

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 13:09:37 ago (+2/-1)

Lol. Two weeks ago I was working outside and saw the moon illuminated about 80%. It was 8 am. What kind of retard believes they can see an 80% illuminated Moon during the day on a ball? I'll tell you. A kike retard like yourself.

[ - ] big_fat_dangus -1 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 14:10:21 ago (+2/-3)

You are literally too stupid to understand how light reflects. Typical with flat tards, along with being too stupid to understand inertia (and almost any other concept within physics). It's hilarious watching you strain your tiny flat tard brain, so keep it up 😉

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 14:46:04 ago (+2/-1)

Lol.

"Too stupid to understand how light reflects"

I guess this is just another one of those miracles where reflected light happens to be cold instead of warm.

"strain your tiny brain"

Is there some kind of diagram you can show me? A drawing maybe. Does NASA have a infographic that can show me how it's possible to see the moon during the day? I'd love to see such a picture.

"Too stupid to understand inertia"

True. I can't understand why I can stack stones by the river yet I'm on a ball that's spinning a thousand miles per hour and varying and speed.

[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 16:16:43 ago (+1/-1)

Many such cases!

[ - ] McNasty 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 20:31:26 ago (+0/-0)

Lol. You told me that I don't know how inertia works, but you believe water can stick to the outside of a spinning ball.

[ - ] Steelerfish 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 10:05:55 ago (+2/-0)

Look at all that maths. Fucking racist cracker!

[ - ] Sector7 -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 11:07:41 ago (+1/-3)

Save yourself some time while causing them to recoil and shrink back by just mentioning or linking a Professor Dave Explains video.

"He's not even a real professor!"

His reddit douchiness just makes him crushing their 'arguments' funnier.

[ - ] McNasty 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 12:54:38 ago (+3/-1)

Professor Dave? Lol. You are such a kike. Does he have any video explaining how ridiculous it is to deny the Holocaust?

[ - ] Sector7 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 14, 2023 11:28:19 ago (+0/-0)

The holohoax is easily refutable. Flatters fear the flat earth debunkings of the fake professor because they are not.

[ - ] deleted 4 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 11:50:56 ago (+4/-0)

deleted

[ - ] McNasty 6 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 14:02:32 ago (+6/-0)

That's the funny thing about flat earth on sites like this. In order to believe we live on a ball, you have to believe literally EVERYTHING you are told by the "scientific" institutions. It's all or nothing and obviously all institutions are kiked. Therefore, people on this site, people that claim they hate kikes and jews run the world, will defend every jewish institution even though it's as simple as seeing the moon during the day. Personally, I used to think this site was based until I saw the amount of kikery that happens when you question kike faggots like Albert Einstein.

[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 14:27:49 ago (+1/-0)

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 14:49:31 ago (+1/-0)

Nice. I appreciate the work.

[ - ] MichelleObamasDick 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 23:50:38 ago (+0/-0)

Math or, more technically, algebra, was created by the Arabs. I do agree with you on the institutions aspect being of Jewish origins. I don't agree with flat Earth theories because there is not enough evidence to prove they are correct. As far as "science" goes, I always look at (((who))) is funding the research. Funding will get you the results you want depending on who is funding that research.

[ - ] I_am_baal [op] 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 18:57:43 ago (+0/-0)

The only variables that could vary in this equation are the shape of the earth and the radius. The equation won't work if the earth is not round. So, if we plug in an accurate radius, and it lines up with observations, than the earth must be round. We can derive the radius by measuring the shadow cast by a two sticks in two different cities in the light of the sun at the same time.

[ - ] McNasty 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 12:52:40 ago (+3/-1)

8 inches per mile squared.

There is no argument from the "scientific community" that this isn't the curvature. So shut the fuck up retard. There is no equation you can give me that would convince me 6 million jews were gassed and there is no equation you can give me that would magically explain why I can't see the curvature.

[ - ] GodDoesNotExist 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 14:33:39 ago (+0/-0)

The flat earth model even has a globe containing it...

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 29, 2023 15:17:35 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] GodDoesNotExist 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 14:40:39 ago (+0/-0)

Says everything is a lie but believes in god FFS, how can someone be this dumb ?

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 16:06:27 ago (+3/-1)*

How I know you are regurgitating bullshit without understanding the math.

8 inches per mile squared does not equal a parabola, a parabola is a symmetrical u curved shape. You get a completed sphere using 8 inches per mile squared * the alleged radius of the globe. This isn't flat earth math, this is the math claimed by those that believe earth is a globe, you fucking retards.

The fact you claim it's a parabola tells me you copy and pasted this argument from someone like ProfessorDave or SciManDan

[ - ] I_am_baal [op] 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 16:28:35 ago (+0/-0)*

Here's the definition of a parabola.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parabola

The definition page actually contains the specific parabola that we're talking about in the form of y = ax^2 where a is 1, as it is a basic example of one.

https://files.catbox.moe/k9tvfl.png

8 inches per mile squared is not something that globe earthers use. It's something that braindead flat earthers claim globe earthers use. I'm sure there are some people that believe both though. There is no limit to human stupidity.

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 20:25:12 ago (+1/-1)*

Yet again showcasing that you don't understand the math.

If I'm graphing 8 inches per mile squared * the alleged radius of earth which is 3900 miles, we get a sphere with a circumference of 25,000 miles. We don't get a symmetrical u-shaped parabola and this is confirmed by all globetard earth curve calculators.

https://physicscalculatorpro.com/earth-curvature-calculator/

So, how big is the Earth's curvature? It has to be small because we don't see it in our daily life. The most accurate estimate, according to most sources, is 8 inches per mile. That means the curve will obscure 8 inches of an object's height for every mile between you and it.

http://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=Advanced+Earth+Curvature+Calculator

The Curvature Drop is how much the earth curves down from horizontal at a certain distance. This drop can be geometrically and is often approximated with 8 inches per miles squared.

It's not flat earth math because we don't believe there's a curve, retard.

[ - ] I_am_baal [op] 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 20:32:36 ago (+0/-0)

Alright, show me the graph of y = x^2 where it forms a circle. This should be entertaining at least.

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 20:43:40 ago (+0/-0)

You first show me a parabola with 8 inches per mile squared

[ - ] I_am_baal [op] 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 20:52:33 ago (+0/-0)*

Sure, here you go. https://files.catbox.moe/oyi6kp.png

Now your turn :) Show me a graph where y = x^2 gives you a circle.

If you want x to be in miles, we can use this: https://files.catbox.moe/pszcl5.png

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 21:09:35 ago (+0/-0)

This isn't showcasing 8 inches per mile squared. This is y=8x2

We calculate the distance of the horizon with the formula a = √[(r + h)² - r²].

[ - ] I_am_baal [op] 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 13, 2023 21:21:31 ago (+0/-0)

your second formula is correct, and you'll find it in the original post. This is indeed y = 8x^2, but if you'd like to plug it in somewhere and post the graph, that may work to alleviate some confusion.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 29, 2023 15:15:06 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] I_am_baal [op] 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 29, 2023 15:52:00 ago (+0/-0)

I do think flat earthers are stupid, yes. Lol.

[ - ] McNasty -1 points 1.1 yearsMar 20, 2024 21:13:27 ago (+0/-1)

Earth isn't a perfect sphere. So, accuracy will vary.

Can you show me a picture

Visually, this is what it looks like:

That looks retarded.
This is what I think about your math salad.

Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. ~ Nikola Tesla

You have all these numbers from relativity. They don't mean anything to me. I do not subscribe to relativity. And there is nothing you can do that can make you see through a physical ball.

[ - ] I_am_baal [op] 0 points 1.1 yearsMar 20, 2024 21:18:55 ago (+0/-0)

Lol, does it make you mad that there is nothing you can say that will prompt me to believe you're not mentally disabled?

[ - ] McNasty 0 points 1.1 yearsMar 20, 2024 21:22:17 ago (+0/-0)

make you mad

Lol. I willingly talk to kike shills. Why would I be mad? If I wanted to circle jerk a buck of kikes on voat, that'd be pretty easy. You had the guy that doesn't even believe the atmosphere is pressurized on your side. I'm here to fuck with kikes and leave packaged information for lurkers.