Sign into an existing account

Survival of the niggest

Yes true, part of this is a lack of ability to plan for future events. But also their moral code is quite different. They feel previous crimes should be overlooked. If everyone was punished for their past crimes the entire race would be incarcerated or at least large portions of every black family. This is why so many of them like christianity. It gives them endless do-overs.

Well, first let me describe how I define conservatism. When a group of people deicide to cooperate economically, they need rules to prevent any opportunistic individual from taking advantage of the group. A cooperative society can reach the highest evels of efficiency (i.e. the nicest countries) if they can avoid such opportunistic behaviors/individuals. Surely, genetic homogeneity will disinventivize opportunistic behavior to a great extent (success of close relatives is success of your genes).

IMO, Conservatism is a strategy in which the group strives to produce its own wealth from it’s own resources using its own labor in the most efficient way practically possible. This means following a strict moral code since morality is our instinct for managing efficient group economic behavior. Conservatism does not allow foreigners to join the group since that impairs the future reproductive success of the members.

Conservatism does not allow useless pleasure seeking behaviors to be indulged in by some members while others work earnestly for the group, as this disincentivizes cooperation. Conservatism does not allow some to get rich off selling useles pleasure seeking behaviors. Conservatism does not allow bureacrats to live off productive workers since this incentivizes parasitism. It does not allow large wealth disparities or polygamy or excessive dispays of status as all these behaviors disincentivize cooperativity which harms group prosperity.

It does not allow exploitation of other societies either, because then the group will start to take on jewish traits. Parasites are inherently inefficient since they live by exploiting other humans. Our aim should be to only exploit non-human resources and to do so conservatively ( i.e. not shitting up the planet, being sustainable). We allowed our parasitic elites to live off the colonization of non-europeans for awhile and now they are betraying and exploiting us—surprise! People who just live off other people are obviously superfluous and a waste of resources with no justification for existence in a eugenic future. Giving new technologies to other inefficient groups to help them reproduce more inefficient humans is also not conservative. Slavery and colonization which seemed to benefit whites was just dysgenic and bit us in the ass.

In other words conservatism is a moral group behavior greatly influenced by genetics that is intrinsically linked to efficient economic behavior by reducing in-group competition. Minimizing genetic diversty is part of this strategy.

Now you know what I consider cnservative and what I consider opportunistic behavior (living off the prosperity of the collective while contributing less than your share) and that these strategies are largely genetically determined. This opportunistic/conservative distinction is not really binary as individuals and societies migh be said to fall along a spectrum between the two extrema. Northern europeans and some east asian societies may be considered the most conservative because a higher number of their people are genentically predisposed to be so. But also cultural messages can influence collective behavior to be more or less conservative ( ie, powerful cultural elites who are genetically different from the larger population they influence). Other environmental factors may also cause a group or individual to be more conservative or opportunistic. A chink in China will be conservative but in the US, will be a liberal democrat because we tend to adopt moral paradigms that serve us best.

Anyway, latinos are a mix of iberians and some groups less efficient than iberians. Without eugenics, latinos can be expected to be less efficient than iberians, and iberians are hardly the most efficient group in europe. Blacks have been infused periodically with caucasoid blood for thousands of years but are still highly inefficient (too much in-group competition due to “easy living” in the tropics and matrilineal polygamy) However you will have a range including more conservative blacks/latinos and less conservative blacks/latinos in their respective populations because of heterogeneity.

Plus, people may be conservative in one area but not in another. Some latinos might be intelligent hard workers but still suffer from the “muh dick” problem. Others might be good family men but want to make shekels off of gambling or cocaine or coffee. There are multiple dimensions to good conservative behavior, obviously.

TLDR —The average black/spic is going to be less conservative than the average white guy but clearly some blacks /spics are more conservative than some white guys. It still doesnt justify including conservative blacks/spics in our society since part of being conservative is preserving homogeneity to increase in group altruism (kin selection). They should be pursuing eugenic conservative policies for their own groups.

Blacks and latinos may be behaviorally conservative in some areas and not others and also some positions that tend to be considered conservative are not really conservative imo, like a ot of libertarian shit, pro-law enforcement shit, pro-military shit, pro-capitalism shit like usury, and anything broadly machismo and pro-patriarchy. Islam, for example is patriarchal yet totally parasitic and relies on slavery and conquest to spread. Its not conservative.

Alot of people mistake traditional for conservative but many traditional cultures are very parasitic. Orthodox jews seem to be conservative but they are just preserving a tight knit population of social parasites, which is inherently wasteful of resources.

So yes there are some very conservative spics and blacks, there are som spics and blacks that are conservative in some areas but not others and some that mistakenly identify as conservative because they are pro-machismo shit. Patrilineality is necessary but not sufficient for conservatism

I can with less words. Those are mixed with White blood, generally much higher IQ. Even niggers with a modicum of intelligence hate nigger behavior.

When you don't exactly toe the liberal line, you're considered a "conservative", or have "conservative tendencies".

The nigger NY mayor, if you recall, was promoted as being 180 from the previous criminal. And look at it's record.

deleted

deleted