Sign into an existing account

Josephus was decades after Jesus and Pontius Pilate supposedly existed, Tacitus was decades after that, about 80 years after Jesus' supposed life - plenty of time for a myth to spread and become accepted. Kinda like how books about WWII from the 40s and 50s don't mention the holohoax, but history books from the 70s on do. Lots of historical sources mentioned the wars between Rome and Judea within a few years of those wars occurring, whereas Josephus wrote the first historical account of anything related to Jesus a full 40 years after he supposedly died, and the next historical account was 40 more years after that. The point isn't that Josephus wrote about it - the point is he was the ONLY source writing about anyone in the gospels within the first century. You're making a false equivalency because otherwise you have no argument.

White people fought in the jewish crusades against a jewish golem because they'd already slaughtered millions of Pagans to force jew worship onto them. Despite Pagans being largely tolerant of christian missionaries, christian rulers like Constantine, Charlemagne, Tryggvason, and others murdered Roman, Celtic, Germanic, and Nordic Pagans, often torturing them brutally first - but hey, no more brother wars as long as we all worship a jewish god that was pushed on us by force, right? Where the tales of christians being persecuted by Nero were a historical fiction written down decades after the fact, the jew-led christians boasted about torturing Pagan martyrs to death. So don't talk to me about your silly little crusades that barely even slowed the muslim golems down, especially when the final crusade involved marching a bunch of European children to their deaths.