☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
2

Look at how parallel the Sun's rays are.

submitted by we_kill_creativity to flatearth 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 11:26:16 ago (+5/-3)     (www.google.com)

https://www.google.com/search?q=sunlight+through+clouds&oq=sunlight+through+clouds&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQABiABDIICAIQABgWGB4yCAgDEAAYFhgeMggIBBAAGBYYHjIICAUQABgWGB4yCAgGEAAYFhgeMggIBxAAGBYYHjIICAgQABgWGB4yCAgJEAAYFhge0gEIMzAwMGowajeoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Not...

EDIT: The butt hurt regarding this topic...


17 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 15:38:54 ago (+0/-0)

Lulz, flattard posts (((Google))) search, using a Chrome browser.

Anyways, here's a photo of sun rays through trees:

https://photocontest.smithsonianmag.com/photocontest/detail/early-morning-sun-rays-filtering-through-trees-in-forest/

Does that mean the sun is 20 feet above the road, flattard?

[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 15:49:38 ago (+0/-0)

You're incredibly unintelligent. In your mind, what was the point of your comment? It adds nothing, and neither proves nor disproves any point. I never made any statement whatsoever about the exact position or distance to the Sun, so let me ask you: are the Sun's rays parallel by the time the get to Earth?

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 15:58:20 ago (+0/-0)

You're incredibly unintelligent.

Says the flattard! Thanks for the laugh.

In your mind, what was the point of your comment?

What was the point of your comment? You thought you were making a point against Big Globe, right? I showed by bringing it down to the tree level you just don't know what's going on.

I never made any statement whatsoever about the exact position or distance to the Sun

Except photos of sun rays from clouds are used by flattards to make exactly that point. So don't pretend you can just ignore the flattard pool you're swimming in when you regurgitate their retarded talking points.

so let me ask you: are the Sun's rays parallel by the time the get to Earth?

Yes. Since I've established that the same divergent effect can be seen at arbitrary heights, how do you think you're showing otherwise?

[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 16:07:17 ago (+0/-0)

I showed by bringing it down to the tree level you just don't know what's going on.

No, you didn't. At all. You didn't even come close.

And then, you decided to go full retard:

I asked you if the Sun's rays are parallel when they get to Earth, and you, stupidly, responded,

Yes. Since I've established that the same divergent effect can be seen at arbitrary heights,

How on Earth you actually imagine that proves Sun light on Earth is parallel...? Because it doesn't. What does the height at which you see the rays aren't parallel change about the fact that you can simply see with your own eyes that the rays aren't parallel...neither when they are going through clouds way high up in the sky, nor when the same light passes through the leaves of trees much closer to ground.

And I still haven't made on claim at all about the size, position, or distance from the Earth to the Sun, but it is extremely telling to all of us that you, Mr. "I'm so much smarter than dat der dum flat-tard", chose to focus on arguing about a point I never made.

So it also comes as no surprise to any of us that your "proof" that sunlight is parallel, actually, isn't that at all.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 16:12:38 ago (+0/-0)

How on Earth you actually imagine that proves Sun light on Earth is parallel...?

I never claimed it did, flattard. YOU are the one coming on here, showing pictures of rays from clouds, as evidence that they aren't parallel. All I've done is shown that your disproof is bullshit.

What does the height at which you see the rays aren't parallel change about the fact that you can simply see with your own eyes that the rays aren't parallel...neither when they are going through clouds way high up in the sky, nor when the same light passes through the leaves of trees much closer to ground.

What I showed is that the rays not being parallel in images from clouds or through trees is a local effect generated by the clouds or trees. So come up with a new flattard talking point or fuck off.

[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 16:28:10 ago (+0/-0)

What I showed is that the rays not being parallel in images from clouds or through trees is a local effect generated by the clouds or trees.

No you fucking didn't...that just isn't what you did, AT ALL...and I'm not going to pretend that you did.

Now...considering that, if you just look out your window, there's not a single shred of evidence that we live on a ball floating in a giant vacuum, any claim to the otherwise would be the absurd one that's going to require some 'splainin. And also considering that, as far as I know, the first thing that happened to "prove" the Earth is a ball was an experiment that rests on the assumption that sunlight is parallel, I'M going to need YOU to prove to me that's the case, because I can see with my own eyes, it isn't.

The extraordinary claims are A: sunlight is parallel, and B: the Earth is a ball floating in space.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 16:39:45 ago (+0/-0)

No you fucking didn't...that just isn't what you did, AT ALL...and I'm not going to pretend that you did.

Then explain why the effect is localized, flattard.

Now...considering that, if you just look out your window, there's not a single shred of evidence that we live on a ball floating in a giant vacuum, any claim to the otherwise would be the absurd one that's going to require some 'splainin.

Well, 'tard, those of us living in the real world and not swimming in the flattard pool have already figured it out. It's only you 'tards that keep your blinders on, ignore all evidence that shows it's a sphere, and keep repeating stupid flattard talking points like sun rays from clouds.

I'M going to need YOU to prove to me that's the case

I don't have to do anything for you. Flattards ignore all evidence and reason that show the Earth is a sphere, and then keep coming back with their flattard talking points, demanding more evidence, so they can ignore it. You're a fringe group of retards that do not produce anything useful, while throwing feces at the people who do.

Pictures from space that show the Earth is a sphere? Nope, must be a hoax!

Balloon flights that DON'T show curvature? FLAT EARTH PROVED!!! Analyze those same videos carefully, and show that they DO show curvature? flattard monkey noises

Star charts work for any time and place on Earth, and are based on a spherical Earth? flattard monkey noises

The list goes on and on.

[ - ] observation1 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 13:50:27 ago (+0/-0)*

Earth is a concave bowl.

Obviously.

Think about it. How else do you think the water stays put?

Its like this drawing that my 6 year old did, but continents are inside the bowl with the water:

https://pic8.co/sh/u3560S.jpg

Instead of a dome shaped firmament it's a flat window firmament but made of prysm that bends the light over Australia so the constellations looks different over North America.

The only reason we can't see we're in a dome is because this prysm bends the light making it appear the horizon is flat. Round earthers literally have it backwards. This solves the water finding level problem that flat earthers couldn't solve. Imagine you are in a round bucket of water spinning the bucket. The water presses against the walls. Not because of gravity, which we know doesn't exist, but because the centripetal force pushing the water against the walls. A flat or round earth model would have lost all its water already. Nasa doesnt want you to know, we are in a bowl with a flat prysm firmament.

P.S. I'm from the concave simulation multiverse that spells Prism like Prysm.

[ - ] PhimoticEmbrace 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 13:18:52 ago (+0/-0)

lol what is this meant to prove?

[ - ] purityspiral 1 point 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 13:37:26 ago (+1/-0)

How terrified you are of asking the questions.

[ - ] PhimoticEmbrace 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 13:39:33 ago (+0/-0)

Huh?

[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 13:27:53 ago (+0/-0)

One of the most basic assumptions people make about the Earth being a globe is that you, supposedly, can measure the shadows of two poles in the ground at two pretty far away places at the same time, and the shadows will be different lengths. This is supposedly because the Sun's light is parallel so therefor the Earth must be curved. The reality is the Sun's rays simply aren't parallel.

[ - ] PhimoticEmbrace 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 13:31:16 ago (+0/-0)

lmao

[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 13:42:58 ago (+0/-0)

So there's nothing I said that's incorrect and you completely agree with everything I said?

[ - ] deleted 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 12:22:45 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 12:27:51 ago (+0/-0)

If "the simulation" is all there is, then it's just reality, unless you're claiming there's a more real "reality" outside of what you're claiming is "the simulation".

[ - ] Cantaloupe 0 points 9 monthsJul 29, 2023 12:03:20 ago (+0/-0)*

Imagine being in a the shade of a house, building, or tree - the sunlight on the other side is completely blocked. So you must be sitting in utter darkness right? Just like how during an eclipse it's completely black right?

Because reflected or re-radiated light cannot happen.

Like a light bulb element energized, energy isn't involved in producing light, like the sun. Imagine thinking atoms in the sun or Earth were anything similar? They're in different places... Like when the sun moves through space, we cannot expect it to work the same.

Or when you turn on the light in one room and go around a corner you're in complete dark and nobody can see you

Isn't that how it is?

Totally obvious, why don't more people get that light always goes in exactly a straight line if more people just understood that things would get flat quick. Then we could explain the turtles