Sign into an existing account

The infighting is happening because of a dwindling ability to bribe the obedient cohort (middle manager bureaucrats and heads of state and their respective parties). Go read "The Dictator's Handbook" for details, really good summary of how their system is failing. The perception internally is the ship is sinking. Remember, part of the reason the alt-sphere is able to predict somewhat what happens at any given time, is because in some sense we are modelling the thinking of those very same institutions running entire international regime, both strategically, and at a day-to-day level.
If we sense doom coming to the current establishment its only because they continue to shout, louder and louder over time, that "all is normal, don't panic." to their populace and their paid circles of lackys (intelligence community, media, cooperating monopoly enterprises, etc). They can tell people not to run for the life rafts, and that the situation is normal, but what they can't do is prevent people from noticing the volume at which they're blaring out the propaganda.

I'm not personally thinking ahead to the next system or what comes after as the win state, only what needs to be done away with or abolished. It's mostly because I don't have the pull, or resources, or institutional power to try and have any say in that sort of outcome (unless I want to delude myself). But the destruction of the current regime is absolutely doable, and mostly on an infowar and crowdsourced basis, though some organizational efforts will be needed down the road to finish the work.

A win here I view as progressive - a combination of several major as well as gradual steps that feed into eachother, enhancing the likelihood of each subsequent step to succeed, like a self-fulfilling prophecy, and thats an important phenomenon to understand and utilize at every turn, the social, political, economic, and other circumstances and perceptions that make a certain outcome appear absolutely inevitable, thus driving us toward the very outcome.

Assuming the scenario is true, that the u.s, china, russia, britain, and israel (among others) are effectively being run behind the scenes as one military-intelligence juntas intentionally masquerading as separate decision-making bodies, then they're too big to take on one at a time.

However that alliance can have its credibility and support internally destroyed. This frameworks helps us see why elections (for the purpose of institutional power) are useless for the direct goal, likewise mass appeal. Which is not to say these resources aren't useful in an auxiliary fashion, only that they're not critical elements.
We see the target of our demoralization and destabalization operations is instead the very people who run the system behind the scenes, bureucrats, officials, middle managers. They have to be brought to the realization the system is ending, they have to be made afraid of losing everything, they have to be made to feel betrayed, done wrong, their very faith, trust, and security that relies on their blind criminal obedience (even so much as those low-totem-pole guys who simply 'look the other way' on a daily basis), all has to be stood up in contrast to the belief they are going to be abandoned, and not only that, but thrown under the bus if they don't actively turn against the regime.

This is where the power to destabilize will come from, the power to invite international discord between allies, the power to disrupt policy in a way that leads to larger disparities and disputes.

If that can be done then it opens up all the other possibilities, by creating room for former allies, now bitter rivals, to foment, and support, third parties in rival nations. Sort of the precursor to a power vacuum.

Our model is cancer and 'auto-immune' disorder amongst the international regime's ranks. Our model is Cerebrus, where all sides feed the guarddog, until they realize too late the dog has grown big enough to devour them all.

Ordo Ab Chao.