☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
18

If you were Adolf Hitler in 1937 would you allow trannys and fags to stand on the street corner to indoctrinate youth? Where has free speech gotten us?

submitted by allAheadFull to whatever 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 18:15:10 ago (+20/-2)     (whatever)

Would you defend to the death jews', masons', or other satanists' "right" to openly defy the ideals that made our people great and to steal our children from us by promising them their version of freedom, the freedom that leads to living hell?



18 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] parrygrin 4 points 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 20:05:07 ago (+4/-0)

We don't have free speech.

Proper free speech would have kept a LOT of shit in its lane.

[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 23:25:47 ago (+1/-1)

We have too much comfort to defend our free speech. Why would someone want to be hurt or go to jail when you can go to the supermarket get groceries and enjoy a luxury meal in front of the television in the air conditioning?

[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 23:31:37 ago (+1/-0)

Classic cake and circus.

[ - ] SumerBreeze 4 points 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 18:40:36 ago (+4/-0)

The problem was that those pedophiles would attack anyone who pointed out the destruction their degeneracy caused via antifa.

Not only did they have freedom of speech, but they attacked anyone that stood up against their ideology; the German National Socialist party didn’t just appear from nowhere - but because of a necessity to defend against murders and FORCED degeneracy caused by those jews.

[ - ] Name 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 22:28:48 ago (+1/-0)

I don’t think the American concept of free speech was intended to allow lousy people to influence our children.

The concept exists so we can discuss what we should do about it.

H was very well spoken.

[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 23:29:20 ago (+1/-0)

I think part of the original intent was to allow discourse in how to solve problems and make a better government. If the Founders knew the level of subversion these kikes could produce I think they would have limited free speech.

[ - ] Name 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 23:41:44 ago (+1/-0)

“If they could have fucking seen what was coming,”

Yeah, it’s a really fucked up world we live in with this technology.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 3 points 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 20:09:31 ago (+3/-0)

I've made myself clear on this matter. I'll summarize though. We're past free speech, it was an ideal created for a high trust society. I'm not ok with faggots grooming children under the blanket of free speech. We can revisit the matter after we cleanse our society of demons.

[ - ] Merlynn 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 17:53:14 ago (+0/-0)

Freedom of speech means being able to disagree with someone else's speech. This is the natural counter to the "too much freedom" argument. Yes,they could stand on the corner and talk about their bullshit but I could also stand on the same corner and argue against their ideas. It wouldn't just be them being allowed to talk.

Although realistically,most people would just shout them down as faggots cause that's what usually happens when people aren't forced to put up with that shit.

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 04:46:08 ago (+0/-0)

Total freedom of speech is a bad idea.

[ - ] Trope 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 23:27:26 ago (+0/-0)

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

We have every right to assemble against it as people. Religion has every tight to assemble against it.

[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 23:51:16 ago (+0/-0)

Assemble "peaceably", "redress of grievances", talking to Satan is a waste of time. What we need is back in the Declaration of Independence.

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 17, 2023 21:59:23 ago (+1/-1)

no one would listen to a random fag or tranny on the street, they get listened to only when backed by state power and amplified. the nazis cleaned up their society by simply arresting active communists who could be charged with something, they didn't need to resort to extremes like you're mentioning.

[ - ] allAheadFull [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 00:06:22 ago (+0/-0)

The street corner is a metaphor. These people are in our schools, the television, your kids phones, movies, and books. The Nazis didn't have big data to keep them from organizing or the lure of the computer screen to keep them from doing anything at all.

What extremes did I mention?